Case Document Filed Page of EX I I EX I I Tm William Langford Confidential Attorneys Eyes Only Tm Golkow Litigation Services Tm Page Tm F0 Tf IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Tm F0 Tf GOVERNMENT OF THE Tm F0 Tf UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS CASE NO Tm F0 Tf Plaintiff JSR Tm F0 Tf Tm F0 Tf JPMORGAN CHASE BANK Tm F0 Tf N.A Tm F0 Tf Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff Tm F0 Tf JPMORGAN CHASE BANK Tm F0 Tf N.A Tm F0 Tf Third Party Plaintiff Tm F0 Tf Tm F0 Tf JAMES EDWARD STALEY Tm F0 Tf Third Party Defendant Tm F0 Tf CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY Tm F0 Tf May Tm F0 Tf Videotaped deposition Tm F0 Tf of WILLIAM LANGFORD taken pursuant to notice was held at the law offices of Tm F0 Tf Boies Schiller Flexner LLP Hudson Yards New York New York and remotely Tm F0 Tf beginning at a.m on the above date before Michelle Gray a Tm F0 Tf Registered Professional Reporter Certified Shorthand Reporter Certified Tm F0 Tf Realtime Reporter and Notary Public Tm F0 Tf GOLKOW LITIGATION SERVICES ph Tm F0 Tf deps golkow.com Case Document Filed Page of Tm William Langford Confidential Attorneys Eyes Only Tm Golkow Litigation Services Tm Page Tm F0 Tf asked to provide a briefing to JPMorgan Tm F0 Tf board or a board committee that included Tm F0 Tf discussion of Jeffrey Epstein Tm F0 Tf A No I don believe I was Tm F0 Tf And did you ever talk to the Tm F0 Tf bank operating committee about Jeffrey Tm F0 Tf Epstein Tm F0 Tf A No I did not Tm F0 Tf Do you believe did you Tm F0 Tf believe while you worked at JPMorgan Tm F0 Tf that JPMorgan should have continued to Tm F0 Tf provide banking services and credit to Tm F0 Tf Jeffrey Epstein Tm F0 Tf MR KRAUSE Objection Tm F0 Tf THE WITNESS Sorry Did I Tm F0 Tf believe that we should not have Tm F0 Tf BY MS SINGER Tm F0 Tf That they should have Tm F0 Tf that JPMorgan should have provided Tm F0 Tf banking services and credit to Jeffrey Tm F0 Tf Epstein Tm F0 Tf MR KRAUSE Objection Tm F0 Tf THE WITNESS My view was Tm F0 Tf that we should exit Jeffrey Case Document Filed Page of Tm William Langford Confidential Attorneys Eyes Only Tm Golkow Litigation Services Tm Page Tm F0 Tf Epstein as a client Tm F0 Tf BY MS SINGER Tm F0 Tf Do you remember when you Tm F0 Tf formed that view Tm F0 Tf A Yes Tm F0 Tf And when was that Tm F0 Tf A End of early Tm F0 Tf And what prompted you to Tm F0 Tf come to that opinion Tm F0 Tf A The facts and information Tm F0 Tf provided by Phil and Maryanne to me Tm F0 Tf And by Phil and Maryanne Tm F0 Tf you mean Phil DeLuca and Maryanne Ryan Tm F0 Tf A Yes Yes Tm F0 Tf We all feel like we know Tm F0 Tf them too Mr Langford Tm F0 Tf And when you say facts and Tm F0 Tf information I think is what you said Tm F0 Tf what what stands out in your memory Tm F0 Tf about what caused you to reach the Tm F0 Tf opinion that JPMorgan should not be doing Tm F0 Tf business with Jeffrey Epstein Tm F0 Tf A That he pled guilty to Tm F0 Tf soliciting sex with an underage girl Case Document Filed Page of Tm William Langford Confidential Attorneys Eyes Only Tm Golkow Litigation Services Tm Page Tm F0 Tf Epstein I don have patience Tm F0 Tf Did you have reason to Tm F0 Tf believe that McCleerey was waffling Tm F0 Tf A I don believe so no Tm F0 Tf And when you say no patience Tm F0 Tf for this was there something that had Tm F0 Tf happened that had tried your patience Tm F0 Tf A Not specifically no Exit Tm F0 Tf decisions are always a bit of a Tm F0 Tf challenge generally in a bank And to Tm F0 Tf me it was clear what we needed to do Tm F0 Tf And McCleerey had agreed according to Tm F0 Tf Phil And we needed to execute Tm F0 Tf Had an exit decision been Tm F0 Tf made about Jeffrey Epstein at this point Tm F0 Tf MR KRAUSE Objection Tm F0 Tf THE WITNESS No I hadn Tm F0 Tf escalated it yet We were pushing Tm F0 Tf it I had ask that this be Tm F0 Tf redone to push again to say it Tm F0 Tf time that we exit Epstein Tm F0 Tf BY MS SINGER Tm F0 Tf And who had you asked Tm F0 Tf A I had pushed up through Phil Case Document Filed Page of
4,051 characters
