701

PDF Document Uploaded Feb 2, 2026 by Unknown Updated by admin 1 views 1.73 MB
Court Records as described by folder names.
Epstein Release Interview Victim Statements Evidence Maxwell
← Back to Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2009)
Extracted Text

Electronically Filed AM cq Esquire Court Reports ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Attorneys for Plaintiff East Las Olas Blvd Suite Fort Lauderdale Florida Tel Fax Email bedwards rra--law.com By BRAD EDWARDS ESQ Florida Bar No UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO 08-CIV MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE Plaintiff vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant Re NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff JANE DOE will take the deposition of Sarah Kellen on October at a.m at Esquire Court Reporters One Penn Plaza Suite New York NY The deposition shall be.conducted pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and shall continue day to day weekends and holidays excepted until completed I HEREBY CERTIFY.that a true and 267correct copy ofthe 267foregoing has been served by U.S Mail and emantransmission this day of September to all those on the attached Service List oc Esquire Court Reporters ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDt ADLER Attorneys for Plaintiff East Las Olas Blvd Suite Fort Lauderdale Florida Tel Fax Email bedwards sra-law:com il.J 267;SJvt A By 1jf1 BRAD EDWARDS ESQ Florida Bar No Service List Robert Critton Jr Esq BURMAN CRIITON __ _:UNITED.STATES-DrS ICT COURT SO ERN OJS1f:ll T_:OF FLORIDA CASE-NO RRA/JOHNSON DOfi Plainyff vs 267J_EFFREY EPSTEIN ndant I I No116e oF TAKING-v.10Eot-APeo osmoN itAKE Noric:e hat th ia.intiff NE wui ta c1ep srtiot1 of Na:di n-Jo to rmrs One Penri:PlaD _ew,Yo_rk 1ott9 dep ltion I nductecf,pUr nt to:ilie federaiHwe ofClvitProced 256nti i 267day eekends a ay except until co.mpleled Rii t:a a d.c rrectcopy-ofthef oinghas;beense ls it i1itt ill:;ssi9n.this day pt niber to ant ose on the ilttached Service List __ quire Court_-Re ri a ROntSTEIN ROSENFEi..OrADLER Attorneys tor PIQintitf East:Las Olas Blvd Suite Fortlauderdafo Florida 267Tel Fax Email bedwards i By __ 267:BRAD-EDWARDS ESQ Florida Bar No I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN OIsmIcT OF FLORIDA CASE NO 08-CIV MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE Plaintiff vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant Re NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPl:D DEPOSmON PLEASE TAKE NOTIC that the Plaintiff JANE DOE will take the deposition of Ghlslane Noelle Maxwell on October at a.m at Esquire Court Reporters One Penn Plaza Suite4715 New York NY The deposition shall be conducted pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and shall continue day to dsy weekends and holidays excepted until completed I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served by U.S Maii and email transmission this ay of October to all those on the attached Service List cc Esquil8 Cow1 Repo,tera ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Attorneys for Plaintiff East Las Olas Blvd Suite Fort Lauderdale Florida TeJ Fax Email becfwards rra-law.com By els22 BRAD EDWARDS ESQ Florida Bar No CASE NO 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE SERVICE UST Jane Doe Jeffrey Epstein United States Dtsbict Court Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger Esq Jgoldberger agwpa.com Robert Critton Esq rcrton bclclaw.com Isidro Manual Garcia isldrogarcia beUsouth.net Jack Patrick HUI iph searcylaw.com Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell podhurst.com i,et James Pike MPike bclclaw.com Paul Cassell cassellp bclclaw.com Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits aol.com Robert Josefsberg dosefsberg podhurst.com Adam Horowitz ahorowitZ sexabuseattomey.com Stuart Mermelstein ssm sexabuseattomev.com Wdliam Berger wberger rra-law.com Af IIA lor,OUO IDT orto OldllnaCMIAadan UNITED STAfES DISTRICT URT Jana Doe Pltl ff Jeffrey Epataln for the Southern Dlatrlc;t ofNow Yorlt Civil Action No CIV-MARRA If tllo adion ia pandlng ID IGdler dillrid l!e when Southern Dfa1rlctofPlortda SUBPOENA TO TISTll1Y AT A DEPOSfflON OR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL ACffON To Ghlsland Noella Maxv.lell East New York NY Tutlmony YOU ARR COMMANDED to appear the llme date and place set forth below to tr:stlfy at a deposition to be tabu in this civil action If you aro an organbation lhat Js not a party in this caso you must designate ODO or more officers or managing agcots or dcalpato 01bcr pcnona who consent to tcltify on your bebaJf about tbc following mattms or those sot forth in an attac:bment Place Eaqulre Couit Reporters One Penn Plliia Suite New Yortc NY DlD11ndT1C am Tho deposition will bo rocorded by this method Production You or your rcpRSeJdBtivea must also bring with you to tho deposhlon tho following documents olectronfcalJy scotcd intbrmation or objDCIS and ponnlt tbclr hupccdon copying testln or sampling of the material See Schedule A attached Tho provisfon of Ped Clv rolating to your proklction es a person subject to a subpoorl and Rulo cl and rdatiDg to your duty to respond to tlda aubpoena and tho potontia1 consoqucncoa of not doing so aro attached Date CLERKOFCOuirr 3/pil50i"iiftllii or am The addre is e-mail and tcJepbone runnber of the attorney rcmesenu:ng ef party who Issues or n:quc:sis this subpoena are Brad Edwanfs Esq ROlhataln Rosanfeldl Adter Las Olas Blvd SuHe Fort Leud8Jdale Flot1da 8edwanla tra-law.com l,t,W In 0I/Ot Slpoa10,-.1Dlpolcmarto o-.ai.lnaa 11Aalkn Clvll Action No CIV-MARRA PROOr or SERVICE lfflltl11 llraultl not b1jlwl wUJ tu eolI 11nlall quired by Fed Citl 4J This IUbpocaa for la o/ldMdml ond WU received by mo on dau I personalty aervccl tho subpoena on cbo lndlvldoal at plat on ctat,J ot CJ I left tho subpoena at tho individual residencu or usual place of abode with a person ofauitablo age and discrodon who n:sidcs the on dim and mailed a copy to lhc Individuals last known address or I served the wbpoena on IIOIM of 11tt1MdJ,al I whob dosignalcd by law to accept service of procasa on bohalfof t-of ortJOnlr4tkm on dat or CJ I retumod Ibo Sllbpocna unoxcadcd becauso other Unless the subpoella was lCd on behalf of the Unltcd States or one of Its offlcen or agents I bavo also tmdereclto tho witness fees for one days attendance and the mlleago allowed by Jaw In tho amowrt of My fcc.,an for travel and for erVices for a total of or I declare under penalty of perjury that this infonna1ion is truo DatD PrlnfldllOIIH and dll Additional Information regarding attempted sorvloc cm AO IIA bv Subpoea Tlldfy It a Deposllioci Cit Plvduce Domnanla lnl Civil Acdon hp Federal Rule ofClvU Promlre and Effectm fro1eetlaa a Penoll Subjed tD I Saltpoeaa Dutlu ID Respondlg to I Subpoeu Avol4bll llalJl1 lruda or SadllJIU A party or Prolbldllf or Bl 253lrollkolly SWntll l,fsnnallDn ltOmey re.,poomlo tbr lmdng and serving a subpoGna ffl8I tata 1basa pucedwea appb to produoll1g documants or elccironicaJly reuonabJo lleps to IIVOld Imposing WIM barmi or aq,aim OIi a IRd hllbrmatlon penoti Nb!cctto tho IUbpora lasulng COUil 1U1t omOJW thb A A person rapoudlng to a wbpoella to p10duco duty IDd lmposo IPISOplialc 1C11on-wlddi may lacludc lost docameatl amst produce diem ea dlts nbpt In the Oldlnary CllIIUl I and lCUOJUlblo ldlmlloy1 ftel-GII a party or atlDmay CCIO ofbuslneu or mast orgaua BIid fabcl them CD CIOITlpOad ro who fal1a IO comply tile cmtegmtes In tho demand Co to Pr""1lcs lltllalab or Pmnll lu 253IIH Form/or hod ElmrolrltallyStond ll OlIJl4tlon Nol A App,o,o,rc Not luqulffiL A pcnon COfflded to produce Sp,d/wJ Ira subpoala does not pCClfy a form for producing documeob elcctfoDlcally SUlred 1nronna11on or tangible 1hlDp or e!edronlcally mimt lntonnatlon tho pereon responding must to pennla die lmpeotloD olpn:im need not appear In penon Ill Ille produco It In I fom1 or fcnms In whlcla Ii OfdinUtly malntalcd or p1mlc otpiodidlon at lspcdloo 1loss abo nlJIIOded to llppll8I In a reuonably u.,eblo form or forms for dl!paddoa_ hearing or ulaL Eactrolcal/y Stand antUJIIOII lrodu ltJ 0,rJy Off ObJIOllotu A POl1l0II comiDandcd produco docunntl or Form The pcrlOII mponding occd not produco lbe Sle IBn8lblc dilnp or ta pamlt 1nspectlm may ww vn dlo puty or doctronlcall stared Information hi mm lhUI one rorm attomay daslpm,d I lbe 1bpoeoa written objection to lnawulblc Elre1rantcally Stored omwJIOfl Tim pmon hupeodiir copylna tesllng or sampling mQ or all oflho mmrlall or nspcmd1ng DtCd nol provide dlscoyesy ofclcdroDlcally to lnspecdna tho pn::mia-orto producing dcclJOnlcaUy slDred 267lfclrmatiaa om souroes that he person ldentfflcl a IIOt reuoaably 1nbmat1an In Ille Corm or fonna lqUClled Tbo objocdon must-be acoesslblo bcclmso oflduc burden er cost On modolI to clpCl llmYcd boforo lho oarlk:r ot!ho time spcctilcd fbr oomplfanco 1f11COVCI or for a protecdve order pasan rclpOlldlng must show daya eflartho subpoma la acrvcd lfl objocdcm Is made Ole tfltehe lnfonnltion Is not reasonably lloclclblebecausoofundllo rollowlgnsleupply burdeaarcost lrlhatshowldg lsmado tbo comtl aonctbelcas I Al time Oil aotlm to the pcrsoa the serving ordtr dlaoovoly lorn such SOU1CC8 If die requestins part shows party may IOVll lhc mulng court for an order oonipellblg piOducdon good OOl18ldCr1na be limiCIUonl of Rule Th or lnspoctlon ll01lrl na speclt conditions far tile dlKovay Tbne ICll be requln,d ooly es ducctcd in tho order and Prl,._ Prolrdlan Cho onlcr lt protoct I pamm who fa aaithcr a party nor a pertya A l,lfllnlltllfon ti A pcr,oa wltllholdln1 subpoenaed offlcar ftom slpdftcant CIXpcnsc rauJthli ftom latomiallon under a claJm lat It la ptlvlk,ged or IIUbject Ut llrml,w 225ModUII __ prolcallon asuial-pniparadon materlal mllBt qrd,u On limcly motion Ibo Jzaqina GOUltmast I aprmly make tho olelm and quaab at modify a avbpoam dial dcscr1ba the lro of dm wlthhdd doc:umcnta I fills to allow a nmoaablo dme ID comply CIDIUl!atlom ID tangible ddugs ID I mannar dmt witboul ioqubu a perlCIG who is adlhm a party nor a partf officer ffling laCwmallon ltsdfprlvilcp1 or pro cclDd will CDlble the to tnnef more tmm ha where that penon rmdcfes Is pilties to ISSCII tile elafm cmp OT segularly trlD9ICIB bwdae8I In perai-aa:q,tthal onullon Prodlod lf Information piodua:d In mpolO co a subject to Rulo 4S lb1 in palOD ba COldod to u,poeua Is aubJ to a olalnl ofprhllogo or ofprolCCtkm trial llUmad trial by 1mtllina bum sum plaec wUhJD tho stato whcro prlplou lkrial lbe person making 1he clm no1il I tho trtal la held pany tJl received tho lnfonmtlon of die olalm Ibo ham for It requlm dlldosuro of prlvllcpd or other pmccwt matll:r if A1 cr being nodflcd a party mmt promptly raum 81:qUCSter or ao cxocpllon or walffl appUCI or destroy tho spciolflod ln1brmatloo and any copies lt"bas muat not asc Iv IUbjocls I person to Wlduc bwden or discloso tho lnfonnatkm until fhe claim is RSOlvcd must llko wt.ft PumlrUd To a person aut,Jcct to or by n:asonable a1cpa to rotri lhe lnronnatlon tr tba party disclosed It I subpoena tbc lssD1ng COUit may en motion quam or modlt the bGforo boina notlOcd and promptly pmmt the lnfonnl!OII to ubpoona If It n,qulra lhc court under seal for a dctennlnatlon or lhc palm The pel Oll I dlscloslq ldo-,,t or otbcir conridelltlal nmiarcb who produocd tbo Information muse pmcrvc tho lalbnnatlon until develop ur 01nen:lallafonuailon lbc lalm lsraolvcd dlsoloaln an lnllaiDcd-cxperta oplnlon or lformllion tblt docs not daeribo epeolfto occunniaa In cUsputo and N1S1 om Coaumpa Tim Issuing court hold In Clfcmpt I person cixpan1Btudylbat MSDOtr.quoSICdby puty;or who bavlngbce11cervod fall wllboutadcquatocxcuso toobo 1M 7HIJipciioaMlollW iJift l.tiotl iJMIYll lftCttll CUY 225bpuon:x11onpartya1atturo10 oboynnat be 11Xcutccf lflhe i aubalaDtlal to Imel moni ttiaD nnla IDlltlmd trial subpoena porporll to RqUlro the ncmparty to attead OI produce II a Sp,cfMni Condition tt.rnattw In tho olrcmmlCCS place outsldo tho limits ot Rulo A li dcsorlbed ln Rule the oourt lnsh:Bd of quashing or modllYlng a aubpoona ordcJ appelOII or p;odui:tioa wcler spealflccl colldltlonl lflfso avlDg ahowa a sullslandal IICccl for tho tatlmon or ltlrial CIOl be olbcrMao mot wllbout IIDduo hardship and ll emurm dial tbl lbpoonaed JIMIIDD wD1 bo reasonably QOillfiOliatcd Schedule A to the Subpoena DucH Tecum of Ghlalane Maxwell A list of Ill gir1s that Defendant Epstein had at his house at El Brillo Way for any reason at any time Including guests and masseuses for the entire duration when YoU worked with or for Jeffrey Epstein A lfst of II glr1s that Defendant Epstein had at his house In Manhattan for any reason at any time Including guests and masseuses for the entire duration when you worked with or for Jeffrey Epstein Any and alJ documents that reflect scheduling and/or appointments for Epsteins flights travels acmmodatlon massages or meetings for the entire duration when you wor1 ed with or for Jeffrey Epstein A complete list of au girts whom you know to have flown In any of Defendant Epsteins airplanes or jets at anytime during the time you worked with or for Jeffrey Epstein Any and an diaries and/or notes and/or logs that In any way relate to Defendant Epstein his airplanes his properties his assets and/or his finances AO BIA In Slillpoaia Testify or ID ProdacD Doc:anrD1s hta CM Adlcm UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of New York Janeuoe Plrsi,aiff Jeffrey Epstein Civil Action No CIV-MARRA Iflhc adion is pending in another dislrict statc wbcR Southern District of Florida SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION OR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL AClION To Ghlsland Noelle Maxwell East65 Lll NewYork NY Teattmony YOU AU COMMANDED to appear atdle time date and place set fiH1h below to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action If you are an o;gaoizatlon that is not a party in case you must designate one or more officers directors or managing agents or 9ther persons who consent testify on your behalf about tbe foUowing matter.I or those set ftJJ1h in an attachment Place Esquire Coun Reporters One Perm Plam SUlte New Yen NY Dato and Tnne am The deposition will be recorded by this method Production You or your represenlati1es must also bring with you to the deposition ihe following documents electronically stored infonnation or objects and pennit their inspection copying testing or sampling of the material See Schedule A attached The provisions of Fed Jt Civ 4S reJating ta your prorection as a person subject to a subpoena and Rule and rebding to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential cons of not doing so are at1ached Date CLE.RKOFCOURT OR srgi,iriq Clti or ipiily Clm Tho name address e-mail and telephone number of the attorney rep:roscmtilig who Issues or requests this subpoena are Bred Edwards Esq Rothstein Rosenfeldt AdJer Las Oles Blvd Suite Fort Lauderdale Florida Bedwards na c:om SSA Rl:v Su na co Testlfy at a Deposition or Prodnce DocumuilS in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Central District of California Jane Doe Plainti/f Civil Action No 08-80893CN-MARRA/JOHNSO Jeffrey Epstein If tho action Is pending in another distrle state where Southern District of Florida SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION OR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL ACTION To Michael Freidman Avenida Madero La Quinta CA I Testimony YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time date and place set forth below to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action If you are an organization that is not a party in this case you must designate one or more officers directors or managing agents or designate other peTSOns who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters or those set forth in an attachment Place Farewell Court Reporten Date and Time Spyglass HIii Or La Quinta CA The deposition will be recorded by chis method Co Production You or your representatives must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents electronically stored infonnation or objects and permit their inspection copying testing or sampling of the material The provisions of Fed Civ relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena and Rule and relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena Bild the pptential conseqllences ofnot doing so are ftached Date CLERK OF COURT OR Signot"Nl of Clerk or Depu,y Cleric The name address ma.il and telephone number of the attorney representing nQme o/pur1 Jane Doe who issues or requests this subpoena are Brad Edwards othslein Rosenfeldt Adler Suite Las Olas Blvd Fort Lauderdale FL dwerds RRA-law.com I AO BSA ReY Subpoena la Teallfy at a Dq,osllion or la Oocumans in a Civil AC1.lon UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Jane Doe Plain11Jl Jeffrey Epstein De/elldrmt for he Central District of California Civil Action No 08-80893CN-MARRA/JOHNSO Ir the action is pending in another district state when Southern-District of Florida SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION OR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL ACTION To Rosalie Freidman Avenida Madero La Quinta CA Testimony Y-OU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time te and place set forth below to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action If you are an organization that is not a party in ttlis case you must designate one or more officers directors or managing agents or designate other persons who consent to te,,;tify on your behalf about the following matters or those set forth io an attachment lPlace Farewell Court Reporters Spyglass Hill Or La Quinta CA Date and Time The deposition will be recorded by this method _Co:wwuWJrti..i..L:RliieiJoip ourt.lil.ec1 Producslon You or your representatives must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents electrouically stored information or objects and permit their inspection copying testing or sampling of the material The provisions ofFed Civ 4S relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena and Rule and relating 1o your duty to respond to this subpoen11 and the P.Otential consequences of not doing so are attached D11te CLERK OF COURT OR Auomeys 1lgrratur Signa1ure o/Cluk or Deput I Clerk The uame address e-mail and telephone number of the attorney representing name ofparfY Jane Ooe who issues or requests this subpoena are Brad Edwards Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Suite Las Olas Blvd Fort Lauderdale FL Bedwards RRA-law.com AO Rvf Ol/U9 SUbpOI ro TOSI Ill a Dcixmtloo ID Pradllce IlOCIIJlltDb Cril AC1io1 UNPED STATES IS CO fortllc I Ceattal District of Califo.tnia Jana Doe PlatntJ/1 Ci il Action No 08-80893CIV-MARRA/JOHNSO ffrey Epstein Tf lbc action is 1Jcndiq Ill IOl clidncl IIBIB 9ibors Southern District of Florida Def,mdo,11 6:oBP.OE,NA ro TESTIFY AT A D.ROSfflON OR TO PJlODUCE DOCVMENTS IN AcivIL ACON To Micttasl S8nka South Beverty_Dr.ve die BeWly Hilla Ca fl ttmony YOU ARE COMM ED to appear at be time and ptace sei forth below to testify at a ti to bo taken Jn tlUs civil If you ani Ul or.pnJzat.ion tbaf i.s not a party in this case you must dosiguate one ar more officers direct XS or managing agenlS or designate otber-persons Who consent to testily on your behalf about the followlns matters Ol those fortll tn ao anac P:ace North Csmden Drive 4th floor Beverly HIiis Fl DateandTime Tha depQBition will be reQOrded by th mef:b.o Court fyt129cwi Prod;lictlon You or yolD Dtatlves must-alSo bri.Dg with _y u.kl Uu1 depOSition the fo wmg documents Clcetronioally sior lnfollDIIU.qn or objcots 11ml fC11Dit tllOir Inspection copying testing or sampling oftbe matenat The provisions of Pod Clv t"j i-clin;t your i,to-tt it person subjeot to a sut,poeua anc Rule ano relating to your Cluty to iespo"nd to-f!tis subpoetia aiKl tli consequeoces of not doing so sn enached Daio aii_ SlplJtrB o:f_Cli_Mt_or_Dq,,l ty_Ci,_,r,t_ AtU nNy:Sng,,ar,,re CfJftK OF COURT The name address e-mail and ll,lephone number oft.he attorney n:pres,mUng name qf panyj Jane Doe Who issues or requests thfs subpoena an Br-ad Edwards Rothetel n_Rosen __ La_s_Ol_as Blvd Fort Lauderdale FL Bedwards RRA-lsw.com Ml Rev SlulocnD Tlfv Dai,oi,inan or lO lroruo Docm:c1 Cml MIDII Pago Fedentl Rlc ofCMl PnMmUro 4S Effective 12/JWT Protecting I Person Subject to I Sat ooena AlDn,v V1U Btuda or SalrctiONI A pany or allwney n:spondble for Issuing aad servmg a subJ oona must Cll.1 rca.,onallk 5tcps tu IIYOld imllOSJrC undm burtlen or oxoensc on a CfSOD subject tD the IU poona The muJng coort must cnroroc this dlJtv Gild imoose an 11ppl011Jtate sanction whlcb mcluae JoS carumgs and misonablc UDrne tbts on a or attorney Wllo tails ta comply Otnmuul PrDl!lu MlerUl/3 or PennJt 253UOn A Appearance Not Requ,nd A pmon commanacc to proeloce c!Ocuments clectronical llttlmd in1omuiUo or ranglblc thiJl or tc llelnnt Ille mspceuon of P1Cffl!SICS nccd appear ocrson at tllO placo ohrocructron or on wil i aJso commanded lo appear for a deposition tieann or lrtal Old"IIOtll A pcnon commanaea lo SJTOCluco doeumelS or tangible lhinga or to Cmlil lnmec11on may servo on tne IIMt or attorney dCS1gJ181.cd in the sutrpOena a wruten ohjea1on to IDSPCCDJIJ GOJJYln teallng or 0llng or all or thG mntcnl3 or ta mspecu113 Ule prem,sos or to orodUCJng e1eemm1c:ally stOJDd adormaliOII in tho form or fDrms reQllCStc:d The objection must be sctved before u,c earlier of lhc ttme ss,eoiftcd for QODIP!iance or Clays aflcr 1bc swpacna swvcd If an objc:ct1on i mace the followlng rules oppiy I At im tuno on nct1co-to the commanded fJOrllOO the 11trvuig party may movo tile l5S1lg court for an 1der compcllinlJ prodllclJon or insi,ectton If Tbcsc lldl may be rcqolred ODJy a dirccwd In the Mier 8Qd llx oilier nnllt protCCt a person who Ii nciL-.c:r a aff PDJ a llty"s orti from ngmficmt resuhlng compllanu QrzaA"w or SllbpOoua A WMn 253IIU1WL Ott timely motion Ulc luutng c:aurt must quash or modify a SllbpOfl lhAl I fails to allow a reasonable bme to con1T11 II R:CNIJC.3 a llCnGll WIii la neither a party nor ca ar offlca lo ll1lffl fflOJO than IOOmiles DOrD When ltl rasidOII IS emplOycd or regularly lr1lnsmS buSlncss tn DCnOlI acept Iba 1bjccl to Rule 4l lfi tho Pt:l!Oll ma:y be comlDClcd to attend a trJBl by lnJVe ing om my suc:11 i,lac:e within the Slale where me tnal Is IICld ill l"CQU!res disclosure or pnvlltaed or OU1Cr PlOloClle:d matter if no ac,cptioo or waiver applies or IY SDbjllCl:s a pc:1 to undue burden When Ptlrmlltt:d To i:,toteel a person subjecl or atTcc:ltd t,y a lbpocna the Issuing court may on motion QU1ISh or modi the UbpQCl if ii miuucs I discloStDg a tnul.e iaom or otliclr oonfidennal nRBJCII doveiOJJIJl8tlt or commereutl infozmatwn dtscla.mig an unrcta1n0d ex,,en op1ion or mronnauon t:?at docs nol describe specific oc:currenccs in dlaputc and n,sutcs from tile a:,cperts BtUdy 1bat was not requested a Dll1 Ill a penan WJIO neithm a pany nor a p1rty"s cm to mour BUbs:Blltl expense to vave1 mo tnan mllc3 to o:ten trim ecijy,ng CoN/ftlo,a QI an AIJ.unattwL In trie CUCUDIDCCS dcxribcd In Rule the CO Jrt may inatcad or Qlmng or modilying A subr,ocna order llppClrlCe or Jm l1uction under S11CClfied conditions t.elYIJl8 party I Shows a IRltl8Wltla1 no,d for testimony or materltl t11ar catJDDI Olcnr.1Sc lX wlthOUI undue bardshlp and I ensures lbat tho SUl,pOCDled penon will be n:monably com lal8lttGO Dutlel ID Responding to I SubpoenL Prolt:Urg Dot:llftJVJII or BtectronINIIJ Slord lnfo,maJUJJL Those PlOC8dures apply ro oracsue1ng CIOcuments or oloc:tromcally stcn:d infonnatlon A DoaimtntJ A pcrsoo responding to a subPoCDa to pn,da lOliUDICOb must produce tham BS they llC kCl tile ordlury of bu.sincss or mim orgamJzc and label lhcm io cor,esa,o ID the caregorlC9 iD Ute demand Form far hortrtcin Elec.trOl1iCOJly Sroml blformanon Not s,-Jjkd lfa sut,poeqa crocs llOl specify a tbnn for produciag elcctromcally s101ed lnfonnalioo un PQ1iOn lCBlJOndins must prOducc It I a form or forms wfllen IS ordl:wily maintained or in a n:asonably nsable form or forms Jrzetro,ucoJ/y Stored Jnfonnat/OII ProdJcld In Only O,u Fo,11J ne person roSDOndlng neeo not Jlfllducc Ole same e.!Ctlroruoly stored information II more lhan one fllrm tnaccu1lbl11 Ekctrr,1co/Jy Stored l,r/orlfion The person niSPOndlng nGOd not PlOYidc discovery or e1"00n1c:afly SIOrcll in1DffllAllon ft-om sollfCeS 11mt he 11c.rsoc identlr,cs not 1:ISODAl ly accessible bCQusc of undue buden or cost On motion to compel di11:0vcry or Or a pro1ecuve order the person responding must show Cllat lhe 1:sfonnatton not rczumnably aeocsslblc because ofundUO Urdcll or cOSL Ir lhat showmg as made the court may nollClbolC!JII onlcl discovery fiQm SUCh JOUlCCS ir Ille RQUCSU ng pa,1 ShOWII good eeuse considering Ille limuatlom ofRll.le Tllo co:;n DB soc:tiry conditions for rtm dlsoovay Clnu Privllea Prola:lm CA hf omauon fVithh,ld A person withholding IUl JIO:nacd m1onnatl0n under a ctalm that 1t pnvilegcd or subject 1ctcetlan os lrleJ 225Prepa,UJOn matcnal must I oxcns,ly mate the c1n 8lICI ll dcSCribo ttlo nat lrO or tho wtthbcld doc:umenUI coll JlIW iClbouS or tanglblo lngs a manns that without e,,aallrig Inform ltseltpnvl eacd or on lected enable tile rn,--ues to urcss Ille claun J,lformatton l"roduced H"lnformanon PIO luocd In ress,unse to a subpoona Ill subjecl to a claim ofprlvilage or ofl ICOtton as trtal preparabon ma enal person making tho cla II may nollfy any pa.1 tJJa roccm1cd 1c mformsr,on of tha claml 1d Ole baso fbr Atlcr botng notnJCcl Part mUSL pfOIIJIJUY fflDJrn laQIICISll:r or acsuo tilt sooc:ffi informauon 11nd an7 00DJCS has mwit not use ar cllscl0.1e me 1:1fol1uon untll me cta1m is rasolvea must t11a rc,asanablc lqJ to mrtevo me 1nfoRP1on If the party disctoaod I t,oforo being nollf ed and rmiy promptly lCSCl aic mfonnaaoa to lhO court under eal for a clc nmniwon of the claim Tho person wtio produced 1nfonnanon must preserve the 1nformat1011 uir.11 UlC Claim is 11:SOlied Coate1pt The 1S1ng court may hold In eonti:mi,t a pcCIOll WflO having been served fai1s wi aae11uata excuse to obey he svbl OGIIL A nono"Y 267sfallure to obey must bo Bl!c:uscd if the 1bi,oena pulTIOflS to require n1e nouparl to alt:nll or prulluco al a pi11CC outside ht lim1ls of R11JQ 4S A ii AO,IBA bi ns IO Te1 I DeDD9iliori or lo Produce DocumerdS 267Cml Acuon CPIO I PROOF OP S_ERVICE This ll1clion slioald no be jUed with the court 11nl/Q ffiJUt1ed 6y Fed Cfi Thls subpoena for itor,,11 qf f,rdMdHiJI and lk If was relved by me on date I personally served the subi,oena on Ute indlvfduai al loCd on da1J or I left Ute suboocna at the Individuals residence or usual place of abode with ttln a on of suitable_ age and discretlOII wllO n::iides there on tlalteJ and mailed a copy to the lndlvlduala fas known address or I served the subpoena on raame oflndlidllal Whols designated by law to accept service of process on bobalf of naine orprl OIU on da o:r returned the subpoena unc:xecuted bcGlw Other zpecfhJ Unless Ute subpoena was issued on behalf of the Unttcd Sl8tes or one off1S officers or age,m I have also tendered to the witness fees for one day attenciancc ar,d the mileage aiJowcd by law in 1he BDl6urn of My fi:es are for tnsvel and declare under penalty of perjury that this information Is true AddhionaJ Information regarding atteml ted service etc _f for services for a total ofS Serfll,I ltgtlafUIT or P.Jalntiffi IN_ me_ C1R UlT tomu THE FIFTEENrn JUDICIAL ClRCUrt,JN AND FOR 267P-AtM:BEA eoUllrY f:LdRll A Cotnplux litigation Fla Clv Pr-0 CASENO OU tHl:BllMB SGOff ROT8 IN_._lncllvldilally JW EPWARDS 267lndwfdualty and L.IVL tnd19kWatfJi COPY RiCEtV FOR-Ftt.tNG iOO Oeflm"da.nts AAW Plaln_tiff JEFFREY EPSTEIN hereinafter EPSTEIN by and thtough his undeFSlgned attlmleys ffles thls action agalf!st D.efendants soon ROTHSTl;-IN JndMdusl!y BRADLEY EDWMOS i:rtdivldtJally and L.M lodMduall AceoroJng EPS Jtihtat a S,UMY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Ro teln aided by other 267lawyers and emplOyees at the firm of Rothstelh Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A for personal greed and emfdlment In betrayal of eth1ca tegel and fiduciary-duties fo 267thelr own Clients and professional obllgatlons to the attmlr-Osttatlcn er Justfce denberately engaged In a pattern of rackelel rlng that nvolved etaggertng serfes ofagravely serious obstructions at Ju li.ce actJonable frauds and the orchestration and conducting of egre 260lous clvll litlgatlon abuses that resulted fn profoundly ser.lous Injury to rey Epstein one of several targets of th_elr misconduct EXHlBITO I i I I i i i i i I i i I i I I I I i I I 267Epstelrl RRA et al Page2 and others Rothstein 267aad RRAs fraud had no bounda,y R-othsteif.l and hia co conspfrators ad Feder.al court ordeRJ and opinions Amongst the vlolsllons of 267law ffiet are 267tbe subject Qf tfs tawsu1t,aiu the marketing of noo.exJstentEpsteln tU.ements and Um sanottonthQ 1Ser:t c:teposlflons 225fhat were unrelated lo any prlndpled gatron purpose but Instead designed to discover extraneous private Information about Ep-steln or tihs rsonal and bUtltiesa 267assodat88 fancll.idlng weD-kr own pubfic figures tn er fralld tnveslo_n an.d a pP.Qrt mctorflohate demands for payment 267rmm epstetn n,e misconduct featumd tne fiffng of fegaJ motfons and punnllt of a civil ffligatlon strategy that unreratae1 to ltfe me or vatue-:of"thmt cRerits cases and instead had as Its Improper purpose 1he fwtherfng fJf Rothstefns mlsrepr8 en8Uon and deceit tc 267U,lrd party Investors As a result Epstein was subject to abusive Investigatory tactics unprtnclpled madta ettack-s 267and unsupportable legal_fittngs T-hls la ult ls ffled and win be Vig rou:sfy 267ptns against ell the defendants The Rothstein racketeering errterpnse endeP.VEited to ti!pmmlse ilia tore vaiues of both state end federal Jastice ems in Sou1h A0ridll amf 273,vtndlcate the hardwarf Jng and honest Wyers and their cner,ts who were adversely affected by the nllSQOndUct that Is the subject of this CompfalnL Pla1ntiff rese-,ves right to add-additional defendants _co-conspirators as the fadts and evidence Is deve.toped 247ENf RAL 267ALLEGA.fONS This Is an action for damages In excess of exclusive costs Interest and attorneys fees I I I i i I I I I i Ep teln RRA,.istal aae3 Pla!ntffl 131SfEJN Is sn adult-end eurrenU.y Is re ldlng and works In Palm Beaeh County FIDrida Defendant SCOTT ROTHSTEIN C-ROTHSTEIN an individual residing In Broward 267county Flortda and was licensed to practice law In the State of Florida In Nt 9.emtJer200J ROrttSTeN voliJhtaFIJy lh.lqUIShed his law-license In the,mldst of the fmpt o.n RQtfi ln Rosurifflldt and Adler PA f!RRA was disband by the Florlcta me Court en November OiI December ROrH TElN aaested and arralgned Federal Court In Broward County Floi1cta At alJ:t1m r:elwanf-her to ROTHSTEIN was the managing partner and-CEO of 242endant ROTHSTEtN end stuart Rosenfeldt are and were the prlnolpal a-,.ofe:qulty:rn RRA and-each co-fo.unded RRA Defendant BRAOLEY EDWARDS C-EOWARPS fs an lndlv.Jdual JQ it:URg In Broward Countv Flbrida and Is licensed to practfoe law In the State of Roifd"a Al all 267ttmes relevant hereto EDWARDS was an emplo.yee agent as te partner 267sJ;lar8holder;::ahd/or otherr.ei,rvsentatfve-of RRA Defendail Is an 267lndlvldual residing 1n Palm County Florida A1 all time relevant hereto L.M was represented by RRA ROTHSTEIN and EDWAROS ln a civil lawsuit against Epstetn and was an essenUel participant In the scheme referenced 267Infra byy among other things substantJally changrng prior sworn testimony so as to assist the Defendants in promoti their fraudulent scheme for the I I i I I i I i I I pn,mlse of a doffar recovery relatlw to the c1vn AmJons trE!flned below oM rei st ln which was complelely cn,t of pn,port1on lier alleged dQJh Non..party aJtA Is a Florida Profess1onal SeMce Corporation with _pMclpal East Las Olas.Bwcf 267swte Fert Lauderdale 267in,,e.dditfon to its trd cffi A afse mafntaJned seveh offices In FJorkfa York and len ma and employed ever attomeys end 200-support staff RM 267also maintains aft Street Hallenda1a Beach Florida RRA throegh Its ttornayef 267IBG1dlng D1ose Aamed as i efendants herein cqnd 267bUSlneJ throughout Flomit and re18V8nt to this ac:Uon concJucted buslnEWs and ffled law dils on t1,ehaJf of clients Palm Beach County Florida RRA Is cummtly a debtor In nkFUptcy 267RRA Is not named as a Defendant fACTUAl At..tEGATIONs United In United States of Amertaa 267oott Bcithstein se No aa-1:ci:t..eolln United State District Court Southam Dlstifcl of Florida1 has brought an acUon for Racketeering Conspiracy U;S;C against Scott Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of 267RRA Within the iriW.RTU3tlan whlch was med the United States of-America has Identified the enterprise i h9 ll:te 267raw firm RRA through which Rothstein In conJunetlon with 225tus co ooMplrutorsl not yet ldentlfled by the USA engaged In the pattern of racketeering through its base of operation at the offices of RRA from sometime fn up through and continuing Into November of Through various crlmlnal activities lncludlfl!;I mall fraud wl fraud attd money laundering the United States of Amelica as88rts that i I i I I I i I i I i I i I I E"piitefn-Y.RR"A eh1J Rothstsln end his co-conspirators uniawfuH.y obtabl.;ct approklmately 267l;;llJron from tnvesl rs by fraud In oonneollon wUh a Poll2i scheme The USA farther alleges that Rothstein and eo-conspitalQrs initiated the crtrrilnal conduct alleged 1n the Instant lnfotrnatfcm in order-ta personally enrich.than and.to J:pplementthe Jn Brid susta.J the daJty,operaifon 267ofRRA essen ln1he absen of 267Roffistel hls,eo 256llspl wnffl:Jetrng the Ponzi Bdlame the delir:o tfon or whleh-tn.c;Juded llyroll tomperi etion to lawyers staff investigators etc a 260nts paYltire Jncludlng onlimitE;d lmJ roper harassing and patenthil Blegal lnveaQgafion on cases Ficludtng Epsteln r-elc1ted tnattsrs would Jn an llkaHhood would not have be 267sostalrwble A copy of th lmotmaUQn-is 267attached as Exhlblt to,thls As lOte_ fully set forth herein RRA trefd Itself out ss legttlmateJy and pmperty engagfng In the pracUce oflew In realltf ROTHSTEIN a o1he.ts RRA wm using RRA to-mar-ket tnv ents as described be so as to bDk investORtout ofhUhdreds of mlons dOllars ROTHSTEIN and other8 In RRA devised an elaborate plan through Which were sold purported oonffdential sTgnments of ti structured pay-out settlemeots supposedly reached on behalf of RRA for clients In exchange for 267immediate payments to 267fhese cllents of-a discounted lump,sum amount ln l.eslCrs-were being promised In excess of a return-on their Investment whlcltwas to paid out to 1he Investors 267over time While some of the cases Felled upon to lndtice Investor fundlngwere exJsllng 267flled 267cases It la IJeved that the confid ntlel structured pay-out settlementa-were II fabricated I i I i i I I Epstein RRA etel Pege6 Based on media fepatts Federal reau of Investigation FBI pren conferenGeS f1d-reta ancHhe lhfennatton,thu.masslve Po scheme and pattern of criminal aotMty.m tc,,Jure 267lnvestors.began somettme In and continued.th the falt of when the setieme was unc:oveted t,y some of the lnvestoTB and the FBI As of November of laws1ts were aJ ccm.Unui to be filed egalnst va11ous endants Jesult bf:th"tilt mas.stve.ftalldtJtertt am mlnahcmema This fraudute _eind I fnve trrient ls.also e.JtCfenced by the ftffng of Afn9i.Jded 267Campi,fntFor Olssolutlon Md For Erneli,ency Tr-art en Corp rnlte Powers to stualt A ROfft:lfefdl Or In Tiff Atten:rEltlve For the Appotntmrmt:tof A-GustodllJ11 or 267Receiver by ROSE S.DT and 267RRA aga1nst ROTHSTI:?lfi lndlvlduaUy Case No In the Circuit Oeutt of the Sewnteenth Judlelat Circuit Br.ovier.d 267eouiity Florida Compl Business 1.ie lnaffer dlssoli:JtiQil action and attached J,e a:as EJ hlbJlt2 Platntlff references the RAA dissdutton actfon for 267the sole purpose that 267acknowtedg!;ts that RRA amt ROTHSTElN were In ct conducting an nl gaf and Improper Investment or Ponzi scheme based on promises of flhariclat rettims from 267settlements or 267outcomes of supposed leijal action Including the actions brought against Plaintiff EPSTEIN The RRA dlss Jutlon action Uegf In part that aROTHSTEIN the managing partner and CEO or the firm RRA has acc::ordlng lo assertions cf certain Investor allegedly orchestrated a substantial mls"Eipproprlation of funds from Investor trust accounts that made use of the law firms name RRA The Investment busirle created and opurated by ROTHSTEIN centered around the sale of i I I i i I I I I i tialn RRA.-el al Pege7 Interests In structured settlements See Pre lliilnary statement of RRA dissotutlcn _-actk Exhibit reto tfl furth of the scheme RRAs le.tte us In comtJlumcatfons reg tdlng,:fo ppo itfi!s In 267p1:1rp6rteg 267svucturlii settfemeots RRi trust account-was l:fsed m-,ttepo 267stU1undteds of mlDIOn Dhtoliats or wiie tnm of Fnf JtkJs frcrn dupei.Unvasto.r:s er ilctlms_ RRA personally guaranteed-payments 1ek Rofhsteln!S 267scheme went so far as to manufai ture raise and fraf.lduleht Court opf oruera ln ut:Hng fDJ.ging 267the slgnawraa bf U.S 267olstdct Ju ge Kenaeth A Msn:a-lDildUiS..,ClroutiGeart Judg Susan.H Black CJtcurt-fn:other IUs not yet wnJfJ farg snnffar 267daoum8Rt Espteln i:eliilted matters See Composl btt he,:em The details of this fraudulent _sclleme are being reveal.ed or a dally basis through vatio med rep.o,r:fs oourt documents The most recent estimate of the flnanc1al seope:oflt gcheme ft;:fb.at e,cce:edi 267_btllfan dollars eurrently A 1lS a defe antln three cMt aeil ns allegtng inter ella sexual assault and battery that were handlecl by RRA and Its attorneys wdlng EDWARDS prior to its Implosion one of whic1i Js flied la federa1 court Jane Doe Epstein Casa No U.S.O.C S.D Ra Jane Doe ls a named DefendahttroralA and two or which have bee_n ffled In state-court ln.-the f5 Judicial Circuit Court Palm 267aeach County State of Florlda L,M EpstelA Ca No AB E.W Epstefn Case.No I i i I I i I I I i I I I I i i I i I In RRA,-e efi ea A raf gaffer eoltectiveJy referred to as ths ActlOns and fs a mn11 fendent,hereln The Civil Actions W8l8 all filed In Aligust and St!pte!lbei Whet Is clear I 1hat a fraudtflent and lmp Oper lnv1;1stmant er rtzl.soheme was fact aOtlduded and operated by RRA and certain Qf the named fendan i wblch Sttleme.d lmpaded EPSTEIN as.a named defendant:tn the ActioFla Mliiml Hinah.ti!N bpm Aian Sako.WilZ was q_uolel:I tn a bar te sa ffiallfe hacJ t-wlth ROTHSTEN:as:a,potenlfat IR August of beoame sttsptclous He stated was GC1Wfnced It waa an a 267Ponzi scheme notJfled f!:Bl In de1all now Scotty ROTHSTIElN_ was hlcll behfnd a legltlm law fltm to pe:ddle-fake Investments Attorney 5akawJlz was also quofed.a:s saylng ROTH.STEIN ba,l sophhttlta eavesdropping equipment ancHorm law 267enforcement Officer-a who would sift through poteRtial defetidants gar"tfl1ge lot,klng for dam.aging dents tt with lnvesk rs show how potEmtlal Gtefe.ndants qnwd be nce bl lled 1nm paying settlement that fer exceeded the value of any legfUmate damage clalm Ft lauder.dale attomey WOiiam Scherer represents rmJIUpla 267Rothstein related lnveste lodleated en artJcle-.that RRNRothsteln had used Epstein Ploy as e,shQWPteoe alJ:bail Thaf.s the 267way he raised all the money tte would use ca eS as bait for luring Investors Into fictional cases All the cases he a1legsdly structured were flGtlonat I dbnt belfeve there was a real one In there In fact on November William Scherer on behalf of certain clients filed a page Complaint against ROTHSTEIN David Beden Debra ViRegas Andrew Barnett TO Sank NA Frank i I I v.RJ Panes Spinosa Jennifer KeRitetter Rosanne Ctuetsky and Frank Prev.e a various ailegatlons that further prove the massive Ponzi behlnrj the RAA fa de and as Nov mber 2oes page Amend"ed Co 260plalrit naming additional emiamBYJas;flie.tlt_ ti ln-ao Stltf ipJ VlnfGnndon lreff T:HSTEIN Oa Boden Oebbfa Vflfe.gas Andrew Samett Mich Flstan and Kenneth Jenne emptqyees of RRA 267through broke or middlemen would stage regular f!leat,g during whfch false statements re made about Iha number of caseslcllen1B that existed or RRA had egalnst EN and the value thereof 1bay:woot llbw end snare actual case files itom 1he EP r!Elfll aellonb.wtth hedge fund maaijg Thus he attomeys aA!:S ell have waived any atfomey-clle.nt or wcrk prQduct-privileg tt,at etwiae may have dsted Bacaase potential Investors were given access to some of the actual Civil Action flte lhv sfdr tf tid parties 267may have beeame aware of a name of an exlstrng alntiff Wfio oa f8lf 267a-,;ionymolie!y agalnSt 1n-,and had opposed dt closu of her legal ffllme In all otlier Instances by RRA ROTHSTEtN and EDWARDS clalmlr:lg the need for anonymity wtth regard to exJatlng or abrfcated clients they were able to effectively use 1nilials Jane Doe or other anonymoue deslghetlons which was a key element in the JraLidulent schema Fictitious name c:ould tr.eated to make the Investors believe many,o cases exls.ted against Epstein I I I I I I I I I I Ep teln MA et al Page10 tn each of ftRA!s Civil Actions Plaintiffs are or were repa:esented by RRA and its 267atiomeys lricJudlng ROTHSTEIN and 243.DWARE addl fRVesttars were told that IA addlUon to the CivD Actions another flfty SO plus 267ahOnymous 225.fe.matea 267weM repr a 267ented FW with 267the potanlfat for hundr of mUIJo:ns of dollar.s Ill settlements Qf1EI that RR/A eiI attomeys W9Utd sue Epstein ifflle9 pafd,exomttam-setUemem amounts to h:1s high-profile friends OA lnfom"lalon and belief EDWARD 267knew or should have known that RO":rHS.TElN Wtle utillzli:lg RRA as a 267fmnt for th massive Ponzi scheme aFld/or were 1RtiiH:lA ill leterest:ot fnve tmaot In CM.Aclr af cUler etairil lnvoMng ei,siela 2t Furthiir evidencing 267that EDWARDS and possibly other attomeys of RRA 267knew or shculd have known and participated In the contihaatlon of the massive Ponzi 225SGlieme fmnt-pagta PaJro Beach,Post 267et-tfcle dated November reported-On 267the re _nt fllmg of ail amended forfel ire complaint by tors against dozens of ROTHSTEIN"B rea1 estate propertl fO Jgn OBJS re taumnts and other assets 267fncluding In the Jawyef-s bank atcognt rn Mo.rocco tong with millions more donated to 267political campaigns amt charitable funds The-artle1e 267further reported that Attorney Scott ROTHSTEIN tapped into mDllons of dollars from his massive Investment scam to cover payroll costs at his expanding Fort Lauderdale law1irm federat authorities said In court records released Monday ROTHSTEIN law firm RRA generated re.vonue of mutlon In one recent year yet his raw firm had a payroll of million I I I I I i I jj I I i I i I I Steln ij,taJ i P.lQ tt,JQ satd ROTHSTEfN wilt owned of RRA used nvetfQra money-from his PollZJ schem to make up the shortfall 267they Subsequ mt artJetes and court filings have effected ROTHSTEIN reiVecf i::ompenution-ln of mnllon In and niWlon In whDe hfs 1ve t:gr:eaterttian 6.mlmon In THSTelN attempted to-lure the entltylmown.;;as pital Club D3 efferiut op nJW to fnvest 1h a pl.lHt.lli court settlement against EIN _yet thta BUpposed selflemem never existed and was entirely fabli ed to 267augment his con ator-y ROTHSTEIN upon lmonnatlon and belief 267,lnYbd to his OffiCe to VleW thirteen bankers boxes ot case files In Jane Doe ae oHhe ClvJI AdlQnsf fR attempt 1rn,ubstantlate that the claims agalnst EPST-ElN 267legBfmdte:and Hti JlC8.ob ined.agaJnst.hlRJ by RRA ROill S-TBN and DWAADS the Team;was real Upon tri at!Qr and llef ROTHSTEIN and others offered other 267investora llke 267foe entity 267fabrfcated 267lnvestment-opporturifties In the Olvll Actlons Involving EPSTEIN Fisten a,former Dade County polk;a officer a questionable police reoord and RRA lnves_Uga,tor anilJenne former attomey Broward--County Shenff and felon assisted ROTHSTEIN In 267making 267these offers by providing conflden11aJ prMleged wart psvdu Information to pr.ospective third-party Investors i I i I I i I i i i i I i i I I I pat RRA el al Pegi f2 SO By l!Slhg the CMI Actions aga1nst EPSTEIN as balr and fabrioatlng setemeats ogQ lng ea ROTHSTEtN and athars were able to lure investors Into RQT la1r and 267them mffllons of tlollam which In tum was Uffd to Jund the:iJHlgatbn-,:q EP8ll:tM 267for the Oki pur:pi,n of oomtnulng the ma-.lve Ponzi Slm ffl As pan ofttils scheme ROTHSTEIN and the Utlgatlon Team lndMcfl.raUy en In a e.ffe.tt_ have tJnethlcally-and 1Jlegally Sold sff:swad lo sold and/or assb;ted mfll 267the sale otan Interest-In non 267-settred parsooat lnury 267lawsuits Which ere non-iasstgnabJa and oon t:abte or sold non-existent structured settlements ncladlng 1hose cases.lnvoMng Epstetn Raacl,ed agreemehts to snare attorneys fees with non-lawyers invest money to pay plalt tiffs L.M c.W and Jane up_ moAersuth that plaintiff woul refuse to-settle the Clvil Adfo-ns i Qo.hdutited searches wiretaps er lntetcepted conver.satlOns th VfoJatton of state or federal laws _and Bar rules and Utilized 267the judlcfal process lnciudlng but not llmltsd to unteasoo:able and unnecessary discovery for the sole purpose of furthering the Ponzi scheme Atfj such 267action by ROTHSTEIN and other attomeys lncll:lding the llt1Q:11Uon Team dlrectly or lndlrectly would poten11elly be a vialatfon of various Fforida Bar Rules I i i I I I i i I i i I I teln RRA et BJ ln-oJudmg 267pro.hJb.iting the Improper sharing of fees or costs and various cQJlfllots of sues rules Evtd ncfng 267ti;at the IJtlgaflon Team knew or:should hav wn oft.he pmper rpose that 267ROTHSTEIN was pt1rsulng In the coritlnuatl of the sch R01ltSTEtN used RAA"s Ullgatlon Team In the EPSTafN cases to pu Qe Issues and e1fd8ll68 unttflated to 267end unn8 88ery to the claims pied In the CMr Actlolis but slgntflcan11y beneffcial to lure Investors Into the Ponzi scheme crohes1rated by RQTlftS-TEIN afld other co-consplralors Upon 267IAformaQon and belret ROTHSTEJN catlfers i;-inwsOgatora discovered that them wer:e hlgtt.,profile lndlvlduals anbwfd na pri.vala where se assaults teak place and shawed D3 and posslbly others copies of flight log piarpone.dly cootatntng names of celebriUes dlgnttaries and intemationat flgUres For iAstance th:e 267Utlgatlon T.eam relentfe11sly end lmowlngly 267t,tJrsued flight-data r:Jnd 267paeseiig manffcmts regenflng 267fltghte EPST-EIN took wilh,:tlleS 267famOUI lndlvldu818 lmoWing full weu that no underage women wera onboald aDd no lntclt actlvttfes took pktce ROTHSTEtN and the Lltfgatlon Team also inappropriately attempted to fake the deposltlons these celebrities In a calculated effort to bOtster the rnametlng scam that waa taking pJatJ One of Plaintiffs counsel EDWARDS de.posed three of EPSTEINS plJots and sought O,e deposlUon a fourth pJJot currently serving rn traq The pDots were deposed by 267EDWARDS for over twelve hours and EDWARDS never asked one qaestfon refatfng to or about E.W LM and Jane Doe RAA clients as lt elated to i I i i i I i I I i i 1::,p,stslh v.;RRA el al transpoTtaflcn on fflgl:rta of RRA clients on any Of EPSTai tS,planes But EOWARDS asked many Inflammatory and leading IITBJevant 267questions about pll0tti thoughts and bellefs which wffl nsver be admissible at trial which coold only have been ask-ed far 267the moses of pumping the ca8 and thua fJY the de sell __ 9"a:part:0ftf em to Ulfld Beeawe Of these tact ROTHSTEtN cla t,hal Epstein 267wanted to make ertaln none of these lndlvtdliala would be depssed and the fora he lUid red to sattle-the claims of RRA female clt nts vartoua temlst plafAtJffs tn mtoRS agaJngt EPSTf!IN The offer a million dollar settlement by 200PSTEJN was completely fabricated such offer had ever been mado EOWAimS office also notified Defendant that he take U-ls 267depo.sltlOns of.and was subpoenaing i Donatd Tromp re 267at-estat ma 267gnate anc:lbuslness mogul Alan Dershowttz noted Harvard Law profesSQr constftutlonal attorney and one EPSTEINS ctlminal defenseaattom ys ru BIU 267Cnnton FoimerPteSf ent of the United States iv rommy Mottola fo er:Presldent-of So y-Record aoo David Copperfield Jlluslonlst The above-named Individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTEIN with whom he knew through business or philanthropic work over the years None of the above-named Individuals had any connaGtion w-hatsoever with any pf the Litigation Teairr-s clients E.W L.M or Jane Doe I I i i i i I i EpsjelA_V RRA etal F.a 1s EDW DS filed amended MSWers to 2671ntertogm6tfes 267fnithe 1Jtate court matters V-L nd LM anti listed edditlonat 267hfgh profile wltnesses:fhatwould 267a1tegedly be caned et trlat lncludfng but-notlfmlted to I i em Rlahan:IBOn Governor of New MexJco formerly Repres.entative and-Ambassador to the United Nations and i 267.Atiy 8M a,h P,81VOfIS haVing knowledge of EP"STElNS chamsble p01itita1 otnerdb The 267set pur:pcse of scheduftnQ thBSe depositions or llstlng hf,gb pJDfile fflenda/ecquaintarn as pGtentlal wnssea was agatn to pump the 267cases to ra Thera Is no Jdenoe to data that any of the.se 1ndMduals had er bave any knowledge-regatdfntJ RRA OMJ Mtlbns In furtberai-lce of their Dtegal and fme:n:fulent theme agalost EPSTEIN ROT.HST:EtN EDWAROS Wh eJihar know or should have known and at Omes Le:M in her iviJ JHJ ISl!Jst EPSTEIN a lnoluded dairns for damages In Jane Does federal adfon tn excess of rather than simply alleging lho Jutfsdlotbeal llmils OrgaRl:zed e-Jane 267Doe TV media lntervraw without any leglUmate legal purpose other than to pump the federal case ror potefltfal These high-profile c:elebrlty witnesses h8v.e no personal knowledge regarding the facts on these Thlee Cases but were l1elhg contac ed subponnaed lhlted ti harass and in6mtd:a.ta them end J:pstera and to lidlil appeal 1o:the mamettng effort oMJle Ponzi scheme i i I i I i i i I I i i i I I I Epstein RRA etal Paga investors or_ to prejucf ice Epste1n right to a fair trial in Palm Bmcn County EDWARDS Betger ahd Russell Adler another psrtner In IW au attemted TEIWs on At 267tt1at 267ttme olltrageo.U questions were a ked of EP tEIN whloh ad no bear1ng on the case but so that the-video _and questkJ11s--could be shown to Investors docted and attempted to conduct completely i evsnt eiJl11rite1 1ecHo Um clt11ms Jh or bfeat tter of--th CMI MUons for.1he putpose of hara lng and embarniaslmg Witnesses an_d EPSTEIN and causing 267EPSTBN to spend tens of thq_usands dgllars tn unneoessaiy attom fees end costs defending wllat.app.eared be,dlscovery-related to the Civil Actions but 267was erit raly mlated-to the furtherance the 267Ponzi Cherne ffler E0WAROS was recruited and JolAed A th t,he sprin cf 267the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to ca:5es against EPSTeN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatl By In addressing the court on various motions from being subsUlntfve oh the facts pied to ridlcalously Inflammatory nd sound-bite rich such as the July trans ripf when ted to the Court in E.W./LM Whet1he evidence Is reany going to show Is that Mr Epstein at least dating back as i I I I I i I i I i I a RRA trd Page far as our lnvesllgaflon and resources have petmitled back to or has evert efngte day his 11fe made an attempt to dre ere not talking about five wsm not ta wetr ta1king a were not talking about whlch I belleve Js 267the OObef laW mOrcement we aF8 talklng aboutth 256sands of ehlldffl ar-id It i lhrougll:a-very lnlriGate and,cornpff that he vised Where:ha has es many as 20,:peopJe woddnQ ero him that he ta paying weu to schedule 267ihesa Sppdintm ts tG kieste tn As en example WARD.S flied an unsuppertable nd JegaDy deftt;lent Motion for lnjunetkm R-eim-afntng FrauduleJ Transfer of Assets_ AppoJntment of a R-ee lVer to Ske:.Chai:ge of Proper4 of pstefn and to Post a miluon Bond to cqre Potential Judgment In Jin:e Doe EpsteJe Ca No Mana/Johnson The motion was reported In the press as-was the ultlmate goal i.e to pump the cases for Investor following However the Court found 225p1aJnffl.f-s--.m.oti9n_ rely devoid of evidence and denied the motion llr,toto ROTHSTEIN told Investors he had another femafes that he presented and tha Epstein had offered mlon to resolve i i i I i RRA,,el:al Page but that he td sete._confidently these cases for million separate and apart from his legal fees RO!fHSTEIN Qnd the Litigation T.eam knew or sl:loufd 267have known tfiflt the1 three ffled casea wete and had mlntmal value ior foitowlng Jon L.M testffled-the.neve had type-of sex wJth Epstein worked at numerous strip clubs is an II lit admitted prE Stftute amt caU girl hn a history of Dlegst 267dnJg 1se pot atnkllters Xanax Ecstasy and contin_u asserted toe 1J Amet-1.d ent during her:depositions fn;oJdar.to 267avi:ii,f answering relevar:it butproblem qiiastibns for her E.W teslffied she won.ed at eleven separate strip c1ubS lnGludlng GheetBh Which RRA represented anci fn whloh R:OTHSTEIN may hale owned an Interest ar:,d E.W also worked et Platfnem Showgls fn Bo.ynton Beaci which was the subject of a recent poffce raid where dancers were allegedly selling pr.escrlptfon palnl Jffers and drugs customers and prostituting themselves Jane Doe federal case see 5_ million from Epstein She and her attorneys claim severe I I I I I I i I i I i i I i I i Eps RRA et-el Page-1Q emctJonat sti ss as a result af her having vo1untarily gone to Epsteins home She teatifled that there was never oral and or sexual Intercourse nor did she ever touch his genitalia Yet,.Jane Doe suffered extreme emotfonaJ dlstrass welt.prier to meeHRg Eps eln a result of having wftriess ti if _:rnt-m1er bfs glff Ads son She was required to give swom te Umony 1n that matter and has admltted that shq-hasJled In swom testimony Jane 0-oe wolked at 267twt dlff atlp dubs Including 267Platinum Showgirls In Boynton Beaeh Conduqtf,J.d ndltLitou and Irrelevant covery such as s.ub.poenalng rea rda from an alleged sex thoraplst Dr Leonard Bafd ln Massachusetts when the aDegm:f police report raflected that EPSTEIN he tonly seen a chiropractor In Palm 8aach named br,.6ard No,reoords 267relating EPSTE1N extst-ed for this afleged ex the"8plst Billd and the alleged subpoena for records was just another mechantsm to pump the cases for Investor appea Allowed a Seoond Amend.eel Compla Int to be flied on behalf of L.M alleging that EPSTEIN forced the minor hlto 225oral sex yet L.M testtfled that she never engaged 1n oral anal or vaginal I I I i i i I I I I i i i I I I I I i I I i I I i I I i Ep fn RAA.-at al Page20 lnten:oome Yllh EPSTEJN aAd she had never toudhed his genitalla Told Investors as reported 1n an Associated Press article that es and other famous peopm had flown on EPSTEINS when assaults tot place Therefore even though r.iene cfRRAs clients dalm they ffew-.of ePSTEINS planes the liUQJflori Team sought pll and plane lo Wily Again to prime 267ttie bwes1ment pum:p with new money wlthout any 267Ntlevance to the exfi;tfng clslms made by the RRA ollents After EDWARDS Joined RRA EDWARDS and former Circuit JlJ.d AfRm:n Berger filed and argued motion to make the Nan Proseeutlon Ag,eentent NPA between Epstein and USAO ptib1 RA SDWARD end 267serg and their three cllems already tum a copy of the NPA They knew what said and they knew 1he cMr provisions the Elgreement had JlO Impact whatsoever on the three pending Civil Actlons The concept behind certain civil provisions In the NPA was to a11ow an alleged victim to resolve a clvH claim with Epstein maintain her complete privacy and anonymity and move on wHh her life As an assistant United S_tates Attorney stated at a hearing In federal court NPA was not designed to hand them a jackpot a key to a bank.n i_ I i I I i I i I i I EpitfilR Y.,RRA et al Page_21 ROTHSTEIN With the Intent and improper motive to magnify hfs flnancfaf gain J.e to Jnd the fraudulent and illegal Investment and/or Poli i scheme had iD.W-ARCS demat:td exms maney frortr EPSTEtN In the Civil Actloos The ns described In paragraph above herein hatf no tfmata purpose-in p.t,IRrtJlrig the ClV AWons agafnst EPSTE1N but rather werg meant to further the raudwlltnt 267scheme nd criminal activity of ROTHSTEIN so that and others oould ffauduRvrtly overvalue the settlement value of thB existing and aon-exlstent ctafms aQallffl1SPSTEtN tD entlal Investors t5 As a result of the fFBuduler,t IAVesbnent Ci cni sc.hitlme RA an_d Its attome.ys 1n the Cfvil AGlfons agatnst EPSTElN may have eompromlsEfGI their clftmb intetas"ts ROTHSTEIN and U,e L:tgatlon Team would have been unable to give un sed legal counsel because outside lnvestor had been pmmts a financial i.ewresHn::the 267ot:Jtcome of-it.le actions Additionally if a plaintiff re.ta payments from rt.We lmelit monle WhUe her action Is pel-ldfng th dearfy uld impact he plaintiffs Ef ectsk Ci wfmther or not to settle the current litigation or shacf tl efr testf mt ny 267commit pe;Ju-ry to 267galn the greatest return on the Investment and to furtherpromoteihe PonzrSeheme The_ truthfulness of L.M.s anegatlons and tesUmony in L.M.s state ctvu action have been severely compromised by the need to seek a multl-milffon dollar payout help maintain RRAs massive fraud Because flctlUous settlements of tens of millions of dollars in cases relating to EPSTEIN were represented lo 225Jnvet;tors In this Ponzi scheme RRA and the attorneys In the Civil Actions needed to create a fiction that I I i I i i I I I I I i I I_ i I I I I I I I I I i In RRA el-rat Ei-age.22 1nctudad exttaordimny damages However the a al facts befllfld her aotfon WSU!d never support st.1th extraort!lnBJ damages TherefoA:l extraordlna,y meaffles were undertaken to create an entirely inflated vafue of her claims against EPSTEIN a frn;iigh she he1d hel alf out as a vfct1m of Spstern she admllted to having re11,Jrnell o"er and ever agam to hlm i:,e lte cum.mt cla1m of atN.se She __ has now adm1tted under oath-,-to being a:;oatl 1glW sl th atJe e.f her deposftJon September rtamcrtpt OT f6 She testified Wei I llwd lffe as prestltute s-ee OT and 1-am a prostitute when I make money see OT L.M admitted Her acUvJty with men other than Epstein b,maldng a day fionJ.prostitution on more than occaslor1s In-one year,a ona OT LM admltted under oath to kaep ng a list of a n1s sh collected from 225J.oons In two or three Uned books 267fncftiding a book of 225P-sa1rn.s tt,at she obtained from a religious store OT Under tho clrcurm1tnces her cfaim damages against EPSTErN one of LM!s many Johns during that San period would be so Incredible and 267certalnly not likely to pToduce the extraordinary settlemems pronifsed to RRA.s Investor In April before she was represented by EDWARDS and RRA L.M gave sworn taped recorded testimony to the agents of the FBI She was represented by-a lawyer other than EDWARDS at that statement She spoke ef EPSTEIN In a very poslUve and friendly terms and directly contradicted the central allegations on which L.M civil action against Epete ls now basad However once In the hands of i I I I I I I i I I I staln RRA et al Pege23 EDWARD and RRA LM:s tory changed dramaUcally AU of a sadd A she wanted to sue EPSTEIN and like other RRA cOents sought tens of milOons of dollans a 267Foi exam J,l her swom.:statement FBl L.M w.as Jnslstent that Is awes91 1e m1:io it FBI At the co uskm of she __ stated hope efftey fidthlng lia i to Je because en fiiesorAa man-and It td a hame Its a tbame that he has to thwogh-.thfs because tuts an awesome guy 267and fls dfdn;t do nothing wrong noUilng pp f.Bl In fa L.Nl sl l:ike so 225highly of EPSTEIN and her rntpfS.ttlons with him 225that th"a meys oh lnfonned a federal court In Jely that the us Attpmey could not eonslder-L.M a vtctim Yet by September the data on whlclt L.M began her cteposltlon In elVU actJon and now represented by RRA and EDWARDS 267new and 267very df rent 267tate ab purported sexual ml CODduct under the supposed Influence of EPSTEIN had 267been thoroughly rehearsed and her role Into the ROTHSTElN scam was complete tn her deposition In her clvJI action L.M declared 267that dont really-care-about money OT He needs time fn Jall He doesrft want to be this Is not right for hfin to be on the-streets IMng daily OT I I i i i I i I i i I lnv.-RR ela1 Page24 itGnt-thlnk my Whole fe,J.bave 267ttved Uiat-shitty ltfe because of Jeffrey Epstefnr In her sworn FBI testimony pre-EDWARDS and RRA LM was emphs:tftf that_ her Interactions wfth Epstehl Involved no Inappropriate foucbhigln anyway fn fact ft was exa!:tlytf opposite Qt Did rre at aciy pofnt kiss yau uc:h 267you show sny kind of affection towards you Al Never 267never FBJ he nev.er puned 267you 267closerto hlm In a sexuat 267war A I No ve ever oo never Jol!rey Is an __ Et._wesome no f.Bt Yet LM flied her 267eecond amended oomplalnt_ln Apn1 after EDWARDS jotAed RRA the enagatlbns against EPSTEIN In LM.s complaint e_ even more safacfous In paragraph of M:s Second Amended Complalnt LM aleges arrtiJng other thfng that Jeffrey 267Epstein coerced Induced or enticed the then minor Plafntffl to commit varJoua acta Of sexuat mlsconduGl These acts lnclt:lded bUt were not lfmlted to fondlfng and Inappropriate and illegal se rual touching of the then minor Plalnttff forcing or Inducing the then mrnor plaintiff tnto oral sex or other sexual mlsc:ond I i Epste!ft RRA trt 8L Page25 fnher sworn FBI statement pre-EDWARDS anc;JRRA LM testified th8t 267ca_tolyn Andriana the lndlvldual first brought LM tQ EPSTEINS home told LM make sure yolire ose Jeffrey doesn want any ffl!l gJ I FIii Yet at her September deposition now presented EOWAADS and RRA L.M told a vary different story Qt My llestlOA wa what dtd Caro tell you tG 267ten Mr Eimte1n aliom ur age It She-aakl It didnt attar Thats your recollection about what sha sald N_ Yes she said I remember her saytna lt doesnt matter Dont worry abouHt Tl eDWARDS ahd RRA LM testlffed ta the FBI always fl18de aure I had a fake I0 anyways saying that I was a FBI Yet when questioned about her fake ID at her Septamber-2-009 dep she And did you have.a fake ID Have you ever had a fake ID Epstelrr RRA et al fagl A DT lil her FB1 statement re-EOWARDS iBfld L.M testfflad flb 267ofhe LM broognt to the Epstein home testiff women she brcriught to horne were eagerfbdhe;opportUntty 267and 267cement wiU their experten_ces A NMe of my girts ever had a problem and they,d call me Theyd me you fQr to Jeifret.s VJS because they IQ.VQ JefkeJ Jeffi y-f a reapectfut 267fie Is f::mean amt he au ght we were of age 267etways This fd wt,aes so,,sad abput Old an.y of tbe girls complain about What ppenect 267after they left there A No You as1ced me 267that question No verybQc loved-Jeffmy FBI Every glrl that I brought to Jeffrey they said they were fine with 1f and Ilka fDf example E;W another of RRA clients In the CMI Actions a lot of girls begged TIS to t.lng tmtm 267back for the money And as far as I know we all had fun thefe Fa I I I i I i I
62,173 characters