Haddon Morgan and Foreman P.C Jeffrey Pagliuca East Aven-5 ue De-5 v7 olo3 rad-3 PH-4 FX ww-4 w4 mfl5 w4 com jp5 gliuca hmfla-3 w4 com November-3 VI-3 A ECF The Honorabl-2 Alis-3 on Nathan United St-3 a4 tes D3 ist-4 rict Co5 urt Souther-3 Di5 str-4 ict o5 New Y3 ork Foley Squar-3 New3 York NY4 Re Cr AJN Dear Judge Nathan The gover-2 n5 ment-4 con4 tends that-3 M4 Maxwell-4 sh4 ould be-2 prec6 luded rom a5 dmi-3 tting into evide-3 nce a p4 hotogr-3 aph o4 ff-3 ered while cross exami4 ning ane du3 ri-3 ng the gov7 ern-2 ment c4 ase in chie-3 The governme-2 n5 says that Ms Maxwell-4 d5 id3 not di-3 sc3 lose the phot-3 og5 raph as pa-2 rt o6 he-2 rec-3 ip3 roc-2 a4 discover-3 obli6 gati-4 ons thereby vi-2 olatin3 Rule A The gover-2 nment is wr-2 ong The langua-3 g5 of-2 Rule A is plai-4 and un4 ambi-4 guous I obli-3 ga4 ti-3 on apply only to3 mat-4 e4 ri-3 a4 Ms Ma-3 xwel4 nt3 ends use duri-3 ng h5 er in Rule says-3 Defenda5 nt Disclos4 ure Informa5 ti-3 on Sub4 ject Disc3 losu3 re A Docum5 ents-2 and O3 bject-4 If-3 a def-2 endan3 requests-2 d5 isclosur-3 e4 under-2 Rule4 E6 and the g5 over-2 nment complie-2 th3 en the to copy or photogr-3 aph b5 ooks paper-3 s4 docume-3 nts data-3 photogr-3 aphs tangi-4 b5 le ob5 jects bu5 il-3 d5 in gs or p5 laces,4 or cop4 ies or por-3 tions o5 ny of thes-3 it-3 e4 ms if Case Document Filed Page of HAD MORGA FOREMA m/y t0 I F/Z V/j 1a qC KS u?v vZ O5 a qr rCX qC 0V I I dc rM?M rM 10Cy n??m?n k?o?h I A I w?!ac qr MCX 10Cy ITy qr M3 Ґ??1rA5R h?H?T3P K?z X?K I v"x i X5 EO5 5a r?q CX 9r Cy rq rqC M3 ş?:c p/p0 5H V)V 6T Y2 G5 qrM?r?qr?r9 q?10Cy rCX qr l1 X?l 3K fm?Q Z2f CX CX gT L??T 2E Cy 3P EM3 J4T L?h??M q?ᡚ?Y r??O?rJt CTX i P!e i I CTX rC YY I 1e 2j CTX X0T1i k3v Jh/e0h1 H(K W/Q0 CTX j?!k 5B r2 P0 0Q X(P0s s(s p0 Pp CTX qq dR B/J Va A N?q qr NEeD K?i N?M?qr EeD k??O I CTX U3 U3 U3 U3 S6 E"L I I I5K7C:I 9O U3 Cn qrr qr q??r?q 9qr CTX G5 qr CX rC l0 WS zN pf1 ODV8L?m jC1DxV CTX CTX A qr 10Cy rYY Ң??P?V CTX C"C rqM?rq?q?qr qr CTX YY Jb?C.y CTX CTX GG4 A A G5 C.C M??r 10Cy rq YY C?J?yO c/XE?lgF GM??H p?ݡG Dp9Oh CTX CTX CJ4 I J6 CJ4 CK qrrM?q qq 9/CX?o CX qYqr rC dd?Z c6S ttcx A CTX CTX 10Cy rq rqYY X?qiX:4 3J Db ZH uD-8 1g?BH I vS 7Oo7u E?K?O J6 UJP U0 UT??ʴ UT UT UT O(p U(u UF1 iZ qr?r CX CX Yr zKW:E A K5M P-M UW VW L1J KJ56 N/Q SQ rC 6J ߵl ߵl 5TZ w8ĥDG oj?K _4 N)?Y Hp pRqc?W26 vz?WBrz?ZB??3X H4 CTX A CTX X4 U5 P8 5D qr qr 10Cy qr YY Mo?ANp D01jJ 9F bzEV 4O 8V CTX O!o CTX KK AA qr A C5 qr rYY 1A?CC V9 a c?F CTX A G5 qr EeD?M CTX 9?rY 10Cy rq qY ȠX1 a f??B CTX 9F I CTX 6D N?qr rrqq qC O?J RmA??b"0 M?.F q?D B?G CTX CTX F4 d6P A F4 qr rYY 4G AV8 CTX UY UL0 U0 U0 U0 UF UF UFAGA UA UA UAL UL UL UL UL UL UL U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 2EH GTU U/U OUoU UV G1 CTX TUV 1G 7A UA UAL X7 U7 U7 U77XL UL UL ULLYX KTX 8Y GJ A UMAT UD 7M GVW GF10 MWA LL MPM M?M 4M XY qr qr qr NEeD 10Cy qYY E2 GH l1 Pd h3V g?KIq V5kL O65S d_xKKU vV 5H p1 Z6 CTX U0 U1 CTX U0 U1 A0 1D qr qr 10Cy YY K??Kl 1B AMwv 1K F1 KV yW Gd T?H CTX CTX I CK M?qr K?SK?PQZ I IRZX 8YCX 10Cy qr CX kv zg S5kB??a iG wA CTX U2 6Y CTX U2 6Y I K,,j j,s 6Y P!p qr 10Cy qr YY G?O 9K mSd X0 9r?yal 1d bY0 XNf??qN D?J CTX P!Z b!o C,C qrM 10Cy qr8 I fX2 9R lO KV CTX Oo CTX A qr r?qr rq YY Lsy7H4 C,6E IL CTX U3 CTX J,O3_3xx qrM?r q?CX Y9/C 9CX CTX Y10Cy CX CX CX YC YY FV uTl bEWa ȓjJ-8 Gc G??Q9E 9Wq CTX CTX Up i I A 9_ qr qr YY D.X 7s F??Y bc3_c iH CTX CTX A qr 10Cy YY EMq 7H AY mK9Z BY A2 P6L N7 CTX CTX a I I i qr rC CTX CTX 7O I FMM qr qr i I I3 CTX Z6 I L(K4 P:u Z6P CTX y8 YY AKH 1U TH9?P Z??JQ hhc r?y1 CTX U2 CTX z2 KTX 8Y d6 i h,x N?rM?q?q?NEeD YY A n??D CTX r??r A N?qM??N rM a NiK 2J GH t?!TZ N?M?NEeD FXL J7Cl M8Bj k).d 0EtUd 1HrUi i N?M??NEeD 9DjX rTva a N?M??NEeD CkY qTva YY h?b CTX BA BA Up/p4 h7 PB pB?B AB N?M 10Cy rq V?C 3e TK??v9Y R5H CTX P6 p6 p6 N?M 10Cy qrY l4 EG 9F T?Zfb H??lC XLɿrJJ?FZ7 t?!TZ N?M?r se M7Bk cWM J6Dl 0HrWi 0FuUd CTX A qr rY 1A?CC V9 a N?M CTX a chlPTT Xx pt LH NJvrrbfFB z62nj RV ZzjZZjz c?F qr NX a a?q 8l?hb?r Iy?WEoM GoNLoH Mi P??jd??YP??o Cm7i?aH?uIBq?W?h9 I j)A a1 nne P/Tv ab WJ 6Td.By??e I pJ?J a C?k i dJtJ JJ g1 JOV DD cOO H2 8W R2F 9K H1?I??GM KA gI/mldL DwF?i iccF??NF tF F/F/V NGs VPXYVVF50Y PM wcff EhF 9G m3WC CR RA gI 1NN DLE D0D TDTDdt fd gd nn dTE0g NVU B6 4B WwM3WC 9_ EP I?V I JA i?J RG gI7tl_G gOwO HAA r?f hH fu?s9 9iY Xe2 L9 RA TI 7A p0p 0SL j?cY vv91 m3WC EhF J??CR RA gI X9 fu?s9 9iY Xe2 qr A J7J7J TAR ROO BE A 2DF 8H_Br K:T7 9kY 1D A01G LK7 I A A AGJ Z2 9JPO CzMd??UR??iMe v?i_?eB EF J??oqÏR ܐF G6 xy K/Cu bhe Xh?t 0CM B9 R2TG DI PD D7 0E H2 C0 I A WtJe RY X?r?זQL?х6o3 5cL.T??TR?eI 0E 9BI 1B BA GDD 1D QfAz C?eN 8V t??DM HL VN hZ H6 7I X9 a A The Honorabl-2e Alis-3on Nathan November-3 Page i th3e 38is 42withi-3n 40the 42def-2endan3t 44posse-2ssi-3on 45cust-3ody 40or 38c4ontr-3ol3 and i-3i th3e de3fendant i-2n5tends to us3e the 6item 3in 3the defendant c4ase in chie-3f at trial Fed C4ri-3m 2A em ph5asi-3s adde-2d5 Under subs-2e4cti-4on A3 i-3i a de4fendant 4reciproc-3a4l di-3s4c4over-2y obliga5ti-3ons a3re 2lim4it-3ed to m-3a4teria speci-4fica4lly books paper-4s docume5nts d-2ata ph6otogr-3aphs 3tangible-2 ob5jects buil-3dings-2 5or places-2 o5r c-2o5pies-3 or po3rti4ons of-2 any o4f t-3hese ite ms that-4 sh4e intends t-3o us4e in her case in chief In t-3urn a p5a4rt-3y in Law6 Dicti-4ona4ry ed By defini5ti-3on there4fore a de3fen-2d5ant in incl-4ude h4er cross exami4nati-4on o5f a p5ros-2ecution witnes-3s duri6ng the gove-3rnment in Here Ms Maxw3ell-4 has n3ot ca-3lled he4r fir-2s4t wit-3n5ess O4nly t-3he g4over-2nment h5as ca-3lled witnes ses T3he cas-3e 4is c-3u5rr-3ently in 3th3e gover-3nm3e4nt in chief Ms Ma-3xwel4l in yet s4tar5ted Because Ms Maxwe4ll-3 has no3t begun her case in ch4ief sh4e had no obli-3ga4ti-3on u5nder-2 Rule A to disc-3lose th3e photogr-3ap4h she of-3fe red in evide-3n5c4e while-3 cro-2ss exami4ning J-2ane There-2 is no-2 5doubt Rule-2 A 4does not-3 app4ly t-3o m3aterial a defendan4t of-3fers i-2n5to evide-3nce wh5il-3e c3ros-2s exa3mi-3ning wi5tn3esse-3s during6 the gove-3rnment case in ch4ie Th4e Commi-3ttee 4Notes t-3o Rul5e sa-2y th3is Subdivi-2sion 3A pr)3ovides-3 th3at the def-2endan3t shall-2 d5isc-3lo3se 3any docum-3e4nts a-3nd t3angible objects w4hich he-3 ha4s in h-2is poss5essi-4on cust-3ody or 3contr-4o5l and w4hich he-3 intends t-2o in3tr-3o5duce i-3n ev4id3ence i-4n h5is case i-3n ch4ief-4 Fed Crim-3 6Com mi-3ttee 4Notes t-3o Amendment Case Document Filed Page of The Honorabl-2e Alis-3on Nathan November-3 Page Cases hold the sam-3e E.g6 United St-4a5tes-3 Medea5ris 8th Cir-3 Rule A 4does not-3 re-2q5uir-3e de4fen-2se 3to di-3sc3lose-3 e4videnc-3e he not see5k to us-2e in hi-3s c3ase in ch4ief United Sta3tes Moore F.3d 7th Cir Rule the testimony of a witnes-3s f-2o5r the prose-3cu4tio in As Judge East-3erbrook recognized 5th3e gover-3nm3e4nt con3tr-3a4ry argume-2n5t in3 thi-3s c3ase ore-2ly 3misu5nder-2sta-3nd5s 4what it-4 5means to of-3fer evide-3nce 3in 3chie or ev5idenc-3e 4in one c4ase in chie-3f Moore F.3d at In fact-2 so obv4io3usly wr-2ong5 is t-4he gov5ernment inte4rpr-3etat4ion of Rule-2 t3hat when t-3h5e gover-3nm3e4nt of-3fered 4th3e sam-4e 4arg-2u5ment-4 5in Unit3ed Stat-4e4s 3Moor-2e Judge Eas-2ter5brook c-2oncluded that-3 5th3e dis-3tric3t court co4mm-3itt4ed a pl-3a4in error-3 in exclud4ing a l-4e4tt-3e4r the de-3fense 5off-3ered in4to 3evide-3nce wh il-3e c3ros-2s exa3mi-3ning 3a pr-2o5secution witness dur-3ing 3th3e gover-2nment cas-3e in chief Id Th gover-3n5ment-4 5is also wrong to suggest t-3h5at e-3v5en if-4 Ms 3M4axwell-3 did not have t-2o disc-3lose stat5ements used 3as i-3mp3eachment while 4cro-2ss exami4ning pros-2e4cuti-4on wi5tness duri-3n the gove-3rnm6ent c3ase in chief she 2d5id have-3 to d3isclose o5ther-3 5exhi-3bi3t use3d as i-3mp3eachment such a-2s the-3 5photogr-3aph she of-3fered 4in3to evi-4den4ce3 while cro-2s4s exam-3in ing J4ane Under R4ule Nor does Rule A apply mat-4e4ri-3a4l a d4efe-3ndan4t uses to r-3e4fr-3esh 3a witne-3ss rec-3ol3lection while ross exam-3in3ing her duri-3ng 5the governme-3n5t cas-3e in ch4ief-4 Uni5ted State-2s 4v Gray Burri-2s4s F.3d D.C4 Cir usi5ng docume-3n5ts t-4o refresh rec-3ol3lection of governme4nt witness4es not-3 cove3red by R4ule Unit3ed States Ki-2ng F.2d th Cir not3ing that ven 4th3ough the-2 do5cume-3nt3s wer3e excl-4uded 4from evide-3nce defe-2ns4e coun4sel-3 was all-4owed to u4se t-3he docu3ment-4s 4to r-3e4fresh t-2he recollection of wi3tnes-3ses Case Document Filed Page of The Honorabl-2e Alis-3on Nathan November-3 Page Ms Ma-3xwel4l does not ha7ve dis-3c4lose-3 any books 4paper-3s docu3ment-4s d4ata-3 5photogr-3aphs3 tangi-4b5le in The government-2 5is dou bly wrong say t-3ha4t i-3m3peachm-4en4t evidence-2 5is li3mi-3t to incons-3isten4t 3sta-3temen4ts Ms Ma xwel4l ca-3n i3mpea-3c4h a pr-2osecution w5it-3ness s4 tes-3timony 4with a-2ny admi-4ss3ible e4xhibi-3t The 5deci-3s4ion i-3n United St-4a5tes Hatfiel make-3s 4thi-3s c3lea-3r In Hatfield 5the gove-3rnm6ent s-3ought 3a le A order 5compe-3lling 4th3e def-3endan3t t-3o disc-3lose six cat-3ego4ri-3es o3f e-2vide n5ce the 92Tac4tical 92Ar5mor-3 84Product-3s 90Inc 87comput-4e4rs 87and 90ser-3vers 88as 91describ3ed 90in 91the tes-3timony 38Rex 36Harr-2is 37on 35June 40all 35c4omput-3e4rs-2 35of 38DH4B 37Indus-2tr-3ies-3 as 126described 126the 127test4imony 124Harr-2is 124June 124c4omput-3e4rs-2 per-2sona lly 36u5sed 33by 35and/or 35iss-3ued 34to 33D7avid 37Brooks;-2 35T6oshi-2ba 34lapto5ps 34iss-3ued-5 by 55DHB 56to 48Daw3n 55Schlege-3l;-3 56the 52s4tatione-2ry 53bo5oks 54obtai-4ned4 55by 55David 54Br-4ooks 54fr-3om Mont-2h5ly United St-4a5tes Hatfield No CR WL at 2Apr The distri-3c4t 3cour-2t refuse6d the gove-3rnment r-2equ4est-3 as s-2hou5ld3 thi-3s Cour5t.3 As Judge Seyber-3t expla-3in3ed Because th6e 35def-2endan3t will-3 34no5t 36be 30using-2 34these 34items-2 29to 36sup4port-3 34hi3s 35case6 34in 36chief,4 he-2 is not r3e4quir-3ed 4to di-3s4clos-3e 4the items under-3 Ru7le The 289Court 286rej-4e4cts 288the 282Governm-2ent 290a4rgum-3en4t 286that the 284def-2endan3t is req-2ui red 2to 229ov5er 230above3 229d5ocume-3nt3s 230p5urs-2uant 224Rule 229be4cause-3 t-3he4 def-2endan3t may 32use 33th3e 34it-3e4ms 32to 33imp6each 32Govern4ment-4 35witn3es3ses 32Rule 40manda-3tes disc-3losure 5o5f 6any 5documents 6and 5tangible-2 4objects t-3hat 7the 7defendant 6will-3 use 6in 6his case in ch4ief and not-2 it-3e4ms whi-2ch the defenda-3n5t 3will-3 use 3to impeac-3h wi5tn3esse-3s Hatfi-3e4ld WL at citi-3ng M3e4deari-3s Moore full ci4tations-2 o5mitted ee also Uni-2ted State-2s 4v Cer4ro F.2d 7th C4ir-3 crimi-3na4l defendant-3s 4is r-4e4gulat-4ed 4in d3eta-3il by R3ules and of t-3h5e Feder-3a4l Rule-2s of-2 Case Document Filed Page of The Honorabl-2e Alis-3on Nathan November-3 Page Crim-3in3al Procedure-3 and4 nothi-3ng in 3a4ny of t-3he4m suggests-2 th3at impe-2a4chme-3n5t evi-4den4ce Because Maxwell-4 offere-2d 5the photograph wh4il-3e c3ros-2s exa mi-3ning Jane 5duri-3ng the gover-2nment cas-3e in chief in Moor-2e at she di-3d not 3viol-3a4te Rul-2e and the-3re is no basis 4to pr-3ec3lude her fr-4o5m admitt-3ing 3th3e photogr-3ap4h int-3o ev4idence But ven if-4 th3e gover-3nm3ent 4rea-3d5in3g of Rule-2 A w)6ere-3 right whic-2h i3t i-3sn and even i-3f Ms 6Maxwell-4 ha4d viol-3a4ted Rul-2e wh ich she didn excl-3us4ion 3would st-2ill n4ot be t-4he p5arty fails t-4o co4mpl-3y with R5ule th3e cour-3t 3may A or)-3der-2 5th3at pa-3rty to per-2m3it-3 th3e discovery or-4 5in3spection;-3 s4peci-3fy its 3time pl-3a4ce and manner 4and pr-2escrib3e othe-3r 3just-4 terms a-3nd co4ndit-3ions g)3ran-2t a cont4inuanc-3e4 p)3rohi-3bi3t t-3ha4t party f-3rom 6int-3roducing 5the undis-2closed 5evide-3nce3 or e)-2nter an4y othe-2r or-3d5e4r t-3ha4t i-3s 4just-4 5un der-2 the circumstances-2 A Pr)-2ohibit4ing a pa-3rty f4rom-3 in3tr-3odu5cing t-4he 4evidence i-2s 4the most-2 ex4tr-3e4m3e sanction avai-3lable an3d it-3 requires 6proof-3 that the belated disclosur-3e p4rej5udice-3d th3e g4over-2nment See United Stat-3es 3v M-2o5nsant-2o Lope5z App 2d Cir-3 see also Passl-2ogix I5nc 2FA Tech LLC4 Supp 2d S.D.N5.Y Pre3clusion i-2s a h3a4rs-2h sanction pre-2ser-3v5ed f-2o5r e-2xcep3ti-3ona4l ca-3ses whe3re a party f-2a4il-3ure to 5provi-3de 4the request-4ed d4iscovery It-3 is we3ll se3tt-3led tha4t excl-3ud5e e3videnc-3e on 4th3e gr-2ounds 4of disc-3ov5e4ry vi-3ol3ati-4on,5 a crimi-3na4l defendant-3 mu3st show3 pre-2jud3ice-3 resul4ti-3ng5 fr-3om 3the governme-3n5t 4unti-3m3ely dis4clos-3ure-2 o5f evide-3nce United State-2s Cantoni No CR EN-3V WL at E.D.N3.Y 2Mar quot-3a4tion omi-2tt ed Consider-3in3g that-4 5the c-3o5nsti-4tu3ti-3on 5imposes t-3he burde-2n of proof i-2n a c3rimi-2na4l t-3rial o3n the gove-3rnment surely the same rule applies w4hen the-3 shoe3 is 4(a4ll-3eg4edly on the othe)4r f-3oot Case Document Filed Page of The Honorabl-2e Alis-3on Nathan November-3 Page Here t-3he4re 2is no prejudi5ce and t-4he g4o ver-2nment d5id not-3 a4tt-3e4m3pt t-3o id3entif3y any Mor-2eover-3 a4ny concei-4va4ble pr-4e4judi-3c4e can be rem4edie-3d by giving the government addit5ional ti-3m3e to r-3ev4iew the photogra-3p5h bef-2ore-2 Maxwell-4 ag4ain offers-2 5int-3o ev4idence See e.g United Stat-3es 3v Kes4sle-3r Cir co-2nc4luding that-3 cou4rt w3as cor-4rect 4not t-3o excl-3ude gov4ern-2ment he dollar-2 va4lue 3the metha-3mph3etamine provide5d a one hour 3rec-3ess tha4t 3all-4owed de5fense counsel5 pre-2pa4re a r-2espons-2e he gover-3n5ment interpretati-2on o5f 3Rule i-2f accepte-3d wo7uld vi-3ol3ate-3 5Ms Ma-3xwel4l const-3itut4ion3al right-3s 4to d3ue pr-2ocess-3 5a4nd the-2 confr5ontation U.S Const amends V4I Compelling 3Ms Ma-3xwel4l t-3o disclos3e 4to t-3he p5ros-2ec3uti-3on in 3adv4ance e-3vid3en4ce she-3 in3tends to use-2 to i-3mp3each government-3 witnes-3ses during t-3h5e gov4ernment c4ase in ch4ief-4 woul unconst-3itut4io3nall-4y 5for-3ce 3her-2 to aid the governme6nt i-3n m3eetin4g it-3s bur-2d5en 4of pr-3oof U.5S C3onst-2 ame-3nd See People 5Kilgore P.3d Colo compel4li-3ng the defendant to at a 6mi-3ni3mum-3 p5otentia-2lly in fr-3inged on his right 4to 3due pr-2ocess-3 becaus-3e h4is compliance w4it-3h the disc3losur-4e o4rde-2r 3may he-3lp 3th3e pr-2osecution meet-2 5it-3s b4urde-2n of proof An7d it-3 would c4ompr-3om3ise-3 5her-2 constit-2u5tional 3ri-3ght 3to3 conf-2ront-3 5th3e witne-3sses6 agai-3ns4t her-4 a r-2igh3t he is6 fr-3ee 3to exer4c ise-3 wi5thout-3 5pre-2viewing her defense 3for-3 the gove6rnm-3en4t U.S C3onst-2 ame-3nd VI Of cour-2se come to3mor-3row5 the gove-3rnm-3en4t will4 have had 2m3ore-2 than twe6lve hour-4s 4to rev-2iew the p6hotogr-3aph Case Document Filed Page of The Honorabl-2e Alis-3on Nathan November-3 Page Final-3ly Rul3e invoked by the go3ver-2nment h5as not-3hing 3to3 do with t-3hi3s is-3sue Tha3t 3rul-3e addr-2esses ex4tr-3insic ev3idence of prior inconsi-3s4tent 5sta-3temen4ts T3he photograph Ms M-3a4xwe ll off-3ered in4to 3evide-3nce 3is not a prior inconsi-2stent 4sta-3temen4t Ms Ma-3xwel4l had no obligation and 5has no obl-3ig3ati-4on go5ing forward to d3isc-3lose to 4th3e gover-2nment 5any evi-3denc3e book5s pape-2rs-2 do5cume-3nt3s data photogr-3ap4hs t-2angible 4objec-3ts buil-3dings-2 5or places in Crim-3 A Requir-2ing such disclosu4re 2would violate-2 5the Fift-2h5 and Sixt-3h Amendme-3n5ts U4.S Co nst a-3mends V3 VI This Court-3 sh4ould r-3e4jec-3t 3th3e gover-3nm3ent con3trar3y ar-2gument Case Document Filed Page of The Honorabl-2 Alis-3 on Nathan November-3 Page Respect-3 fully4 subm-2 itted Jef-3 frey Pa6 gli-3 uca Laura-2 A Menninger HA4 DDO-3 OR4 GAN FOR3 EM-4 AN4 P.C3 East-2 Avenue Denver CO Phone Chris-2 tian E3 ver-2 dell CO4 HEN GRES4 ER LLP Thir-2 Avenue New3 York NY4 Phone Bobbi S3 ter-4 nheim Law O4 ff-3 ice-3 s4 of Bobbi Ster-3 nhe4 im Broadway Suite-3 New3 York NY4 Phone Attor-3 ney3 for G3 hisl-4 aine Maxwell Counsel of eco3 rd v5 ia E3 CF Case Document Filed Page of
