UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT I I I A CA SE CI MA RR A JOH NS ON Pla in ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEI Def end ant Rel at ed cases OM NI BU OR DE Compel Ans er Pl ain ti ff ir st Req uest for ro duct ion an and and Pl ain ti ff oti on to ompel Answ er Int er ro ator ies and In th is case hich ha bee con solidat ed or purpo ses of discovery Plaintif are former under a ir ls ho al leg the er se xua lly as saul ted efendant eff re take place ov er the co urse of sev eral ye a rs in or arou nd hen the girl in help of his assistant Sarah Kellen allegedly lured econo mica lly disad ant aged min or gi rls is om es in Palm bea ch New York and St hom as ith the prom ise of mon ey in Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of ex ch a ge a mas sag Epst ein pur por tedl tr ansfor med the mass ag i nto a se ual ass a lt Th three coun Comp laint alleges sexual assau lt and batt ery Count I int enti on a i flic ti on of emoti onal di str ess Cou nt I I and oer ci on and enti cement to sex ual act iv it i iol ati on of S.C Cou nt I II In pst ein ente re i nto a on Pr osec uti on Ag re ement it the Uni ted tates Atto rn ey Gene ra ff ic for the Feder al Southe rn is tr ic of lor ida and the tate At to rney Office for Pal Beac ounty nder the ter ms of the Non ro sec uti on Ag re ement any cr imi nal pr osec uti on ag ain st Epst ein i eferr ed as ong as he a bid es by the er tai ter ms and co ndi ti ons cont ain ed th er ein If a a ime the nit ed St ates Atto rney?s Of ice has rea son to believe Epste in is in breach of the Agreem ent it need only provide Epste in?s coun sel ith not ice of the brea ch and the mo orw ard ith Epst ein?s pr osec uti on Acc or din ly mer fact the ov er nment an Eps tei hav ent er ed i nto a on Pr osecu ti A gr eement oes not mean that Eps tei i fr ee from futur ri minal pr osec uti on In ea ch of these mot ions Plain tif Jane Doe seeks to comp el answers to certain re uest or admiss ion in ter ro ator ies and re uest or produc ti on that er pr opounded on efendant Eps tei endant has re spond ed by as ser ti ng se er al obj ect ion the pr imar one of hic i a as ser ti on of hi ifth A mendment pr iv il eg The Fi fth Amendment ser es as a uar antee ag ain st tes ti monial co mpuls ion and pr ov ide in re lev ant ar that no er son hal be compel led in any Cr imi nal Cas to be a i a a i i ms Id In a i i ft A me me i i a a i incrim in a ti on per mits a pe rs on not to answ er off ic ial uest ion ut hi in any othe proce edin ci il or crimina orma inf orma where the answers might incrimina te him in future cr imi nal proce edi ng Edw in Pr ic 2d 11th Ci it ing Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Lef ko witz Tur ley The pr iv il eg i a cc or ded li ber al cons tr uct ion i fav or of he ig ht i as int ended ecur off man nit ed St ates U.S and ex ten ds no only to answ ers that ould in them selves suppo rt a ri minal conv ic ti on but ex tends al so to hose answ er hic oul furni sh a ink i the chain of ev iden ce ne ede to prosecut the claima nt fo a crime Id Blau United State U.S Thu inf orma tion is prote cted by the ri vil ge ot on ly if it ould supp ort a crimina convi ction but also in those instan ces here the onse ould merel pr ov ide a ead or cl ue to ev ide nce hav ing a endenc to inc ri minat nit ed St ates eff 2d 9th ir er deni ed he Fif th Am end me nt?s priv ilege a gainst self incriminat ion com es into play only in th os instan es he th i tn es as ea on ab au to a pp eh en da ng er fr om a dir ect ans er off man at ci ti ng ason nit ed States U.S The cl aimant must be confro nted by subs tanti al and eal and not merel tr ifli ng or i mag ina ry haz ar ds of inc ri minat ion nit ed St ates Ap felbaum hen he ifth A mendment pr iv il eg i ais ed as a ba to isc ver a bla nket re fusal to an sw er uest ion or to pr oduce doc uments i i mprop er An lad a Sp ra ue 2d 11th Ci Ins tead the pr iv il eg must be ass er ted in re spons to a parti cul a i a i a i a i a i ma i fy inv ocat ion of the ri il eg Id Onc a ar ti cul ar iz ed how ing has been made i is for he court to decid he th er a i tn es i en i us ti fi ed a nd eq ui hi an er i it cl ear ly appear the co ur hat he it ness as ser ti ng the pr iv il eg i mi sta ken as to i ts alidity In re Morganroth F.2d 6th Cir In aking this deter minat ion the jud is i nst ru cte to iew the facts and ev ide nce pr esent ed on a ase Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of by16 ase basi14 and must be ov16 er9 ned as much by16 his13 per10 cept10 ion9 of the pec12 uli15 ar9 ies13 of the cas11 as13 by19 the facts ual9 ly22 ev20 ide9 nce.10 Hoffman at The la9 ell15 tabl12 is12 hed that he ifth A9 mendment iv22 il14 eg12 may18 not appl10 to becau9 se the ati11 on of thos12 doc11 uments9 as not compel13 led9 it10 hin9 the meanin9 of the priv11 ilege United Sta-10 tes ubb-12 U.S How)14 ever in certain instan-12 ces 221the ct produ-10 ction itself-17 may implicitly icate tem-13 ent-10 act Id For this reaso-9 the-11 Fifth-12 Ame-11 ndm-15 priv14 ilege also enco-10 asses circ-16 ance here-9 the act-10 produ-10 cing docu-12 nts i9 respo-9 nse to a sub-9 poe-12 na product-9 ion request has comp-12 elled stimo-11 nial asp-19 Th-9 us in tho-7 se insta-9 nces where ex9 istence and-12 or locatio-10 the request-9 ed ocum-15 ent-10 are nkno-12 or here-9 produ-10 ction would ly ive document11 ed sti15 monial15 and is12 pr12 otec10 ted the Fi13 fth Amendment.9 In Gr15 and Jur14 Subpo9 ena 3d 2d ir15 ee al13 so Fi13 sher15 nit11 ed St10 ss10 ue pr9 ess11 ed as11 hether15 co9 mplian-15 wit-10 a d9 ocument10 uest10 or subpo9 ena tac9 it15 ly22 ncede9 the it10 em thent9 ic12 it10 ex22 is12 tenc10 pos10 ses11 si12 on by21 the defendant The Co9 ur9 beg19 ins13 ly22 si12 o9 the ifth mendment pr16 iv22 il14 eg12 as10 appl13 ied9 to each-12 request or category requests In ete-10 rmine-10 that-9 a certain re9 uest10 does11 not infr9 ing19 upon ein9 Fifth Amendment pri11 il14 eg12 E9 pst9 ein9 addi13 onal obj9 ect9 ion9 eq12 uest10 sh9 all15 be a9 ddr10 her10 appr15 opr10 iat11 he our10 ooks12 to Epst11 ein9 espon9 se Me9 moran8.992 dum for more par10 ti10 cul13 ar9 iz22 ed obj9 ion9 ra9 ther13 than9 ely23 ing solely on stein 2s jection-10 as initially12 state-9 w9 hich in som-13 case-9 are ess spe-9 cif-10 ic in natur14 Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of REQUESTS FOR A DMISSIONS he Ad mission Requests at issue herein Request rs and all ia ll se a is io re la in sa ge ra je a a ly Defendant financ ial hi sto ry Epst ein net or th Req uest and frau dul ent conveyances Requests an eal estate ownership Requests Epste in a rg a is Co rt a gr a rc im re re qu wo ld in vo lve compel led st atements that co uld eason abl furni sh a lin in the chai of ev ide nce needed to pr osec ute pst ein i futur ri minal pr oceed ing ev en suppo rt a ri minal co nv ic ti on Acc or din ly Ep ste in bje cti on to re spond ing to thes re uest on th bas is of his ifth Amendment Ri ht ag ain st sel inc ri minat ion i phel and Pl ain ti ff oti on i eni ed As not ed rev io ly Fif th Am end me nt privi lege against self incriminat ion is accord ed liberal con struction Hof ma U.S at and ex ten ds no only to answ ers tha ould in them selves suppo rt a criminal conviction bu extends also to tho se an sw ers hic oul furnish a li nk in the hai of ev ide nce needed to pr osec ute he lai mant for a crim Id to a rd ro te ct io th a swer ne no ce ss a rily en gh to uppor a cr imi nal co nv ic ti on i i noug i the espon se merel pr ov ide a lea or cl ue to ev ide nce hav ing a endenc to inc ri minat eff 2d a In asse rting his Fif th Amen dm ent priv ilege Epst ein expresses a con cern tha the se re uest for admi ss ion if ans er ed may esul i ompell ed te sti monial co mmunic ati ons rom Ep stein regarding is inan cial st atu a nd history an ould require him aive his ri ht dec li ne to espon to other i nq uir ies ela ted the same subj ect matte in thi ase the ela ted ases and thos matter utl ine i Eps tei n?s i amera su bmis si ons at and Gi en th al leg ati ons ra is ed i the ar iou omplai nts and the lement Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of re uir ed to co nv ic Epst ein of a cr ime and cons ide ri ng the back ro und facts under ly ing the cas hese conc er ns are reaso nabl real and not unjus ti fied It go es it hout say ing that bei ng forc ed to admit deny and/or ide nti fy the is tenc of the infor mati on oug ht by ir tue of an ad mission or denia is tan tam oun to orcing testimo ia isclo sures tha ould communi cat tatement act Fi ndi ng that such admis si ons or denial pres ent a eal a su a ia a ge se lf i ri in a io in is ca in la ca a re la ive to po ten tial ra laims of iolation the Court conclu des th sub ject requests are subj ect to Epst ein asser ti on of his Fi fth Amendment pr iv il eg ag ain st sel inc ri minat ion INTERROGA TORY REQUESTS The in ter ro ator ies at is sue her fall int thr ee ener al cat eg or ies ontent ion pe interrogato ries seeking inf orma tion su ch as the acts up on which Def end ant relies in suppo rt of his aff ir mati defenses and ple adi ng al leg ati ons and he ant ic ipa ted est imony of cer tai it ness es I nter ro ator ies a nd financi al his tor i nformati on uch as hat ass ets Eps tei has her uch ass ets ar ocat ed a nd hether suc ass ets hav been tr ansfer re or fraudul entl co nce a le Inter ro ator ies and and one ide nti ty inf orma tion int errogatory seekin the am es ad dresse and pho ne um bers of Epste in?s cur re nt ac count ants finan ci al pla nner money manag er Inter ro ator For the llo wing re a so st in je ct io th ba sis of hi Fi th Am rivile ge against self incriminat ion are phe ld and Plainti otion to Com pel th sub ject Inter ro ator eq uest i eni ed As it the Admi ss ion eq uest Epst ein ar ues and thi rt a grees that to force Epst ein to answ er the abov sta ted I nter ro ator ies oul i nv olv ompell ed sta tements that co uld eason abl furni sh a ink i the ch ain of ev idence needed to Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of pr osec ute pst ein i futur rim ina pr oceed ing ev en uppor a cr imi nal co nv ic ti on Ask ing Eps tei to ide nti fy per sons or it ness es ho may hav now led of the ev ents in question to state he acts upo hich he relies in su ppo rt is af irmative def ense and to giv an accou nting of all of his assets an is all actions ta ken him an tho se re tai ned by him it re ferenc to hose ass ets oul iol ate he ifth A mendment i tha Epst ein ould be orced to incrimina te him self in the com mission of crimes Furthe such an or der oul const it ute compel led testi monial admiss ion that coul pot enti all pr ov ide a ink i the chain of ev ide nce hav ing a tendenc to inc ri minat Eps tei and oul thr eaten in va is ri vi a ga in in re qu ir ro if Ru y-G la ze Gl anz er 3d ir Ac cor din ly findi ng th so ug ht after th infor mati on oul esul i tes ti monial di sc los ur es that oul communic ate tatement act hich in turn ould presen a real and su bsta ntial dan ger of se lf incriminat ion in this cas and other ela ted cas es as ell as i ar eas that coul esul i ri minal pr osec uti on Epst ein obj ect ion to re spond ing to thes re uest on th bas is of his ifth A mendment pr iv il eg ag ain st sel inc ri minat ion i phel and Pl ain ti ff oti on i eni ed PRODUCTION REQUESTS The pr oduct ion eq uest at i ss ue her fall i nto four ener al cat eg or ies eq uest for docum fe a me a i i i a i ion it hi Req uest and re uest for financi al infor mati on document Req uest and eq uest for per sonal tax re tur ns from to the pr esent and for a opy of Epste in?s pass rt Re quests and an Epst ein?s me dical records rom Dr Stephe Al ex ander Req uest Each of these cat eg or ies of re uest hal be addr ess ed in tur Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Plaint if Motion to Com pel as it relate to the irst a go ry of docu me nts cons is ti ng of document he feder al ov er nment av to Epst ein in the our se of its pl ea dis cus si ons it him Re uest and is ra nted The aw i ell es tabl is hed hat the ifth A mendment pr iv il eg ag ain st sel f-in cr imi nati on doe tend to do cument hose ex is tenc i now to the ov er nment or is a for eg one oncl usi on Fi sher at nit ed St ates ubbel Uni ted Stat es Ponds 3d ir Thus hil the ifth A mendment ov er it uati ons her the act of pr oduci ng doc uments has communi cat iv as pect of i ts wn hol ly as ide from cont ent of the pa rs pro duce Fisher U.S at th do ctrine do es no app ly her the ov er nment ha pr ior kn ow led of ei ther the ex is tenc or the her eabouts of the doc uments ul ti matel pr oduce ubbel a Req uest and seek pr oduct ion of document he ov er nment it sel av to Epst ein making the ov er nment ri or kn ow led of the document oug ht an obv iou and und eni abl foreg one oncl usi on As suc pst ein ca not eason abl and in ood faith a rg ue th at i pr oduci ng thes doc uments to Pl ain ti ff he il somehow be i ncr imi nati ng hims el I a a i i re ca th be no sel f-in cr imi nati on by pr oduct ion her the ex is tenc and loc ati on of the doc uments ar a foreg one concl usi on and the cl aimant adds li ttl or nothi ng to the um tot al of the Go ernm ent inf orma tion conce ding that he in act ha the do cum ent In an att empt et ar ound his set tl ed pr inc ipl of la Ep ste in ar ues that forci ng him to iv Pl ain ti ff the dis cov er pro uced by the ov er nment oul i mpli cat the ifth Am end me nt in tha such rodu ction ight disclose itnesse helpf ul to Plain tif Epste in Res This ar ument mi ss es the oin As Plai nti ff co rr ect ly obs er es the uest ion is not hether the ov er nment ocument av i nfo rm a ti tha mi ht be har mf ul to Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Epst ein defense i ndeed a eason abl pr esumpt ion oul be that the ocument cont ain i nformati on har mf ul to pst ein and that is pr cis ly hy the ov er nment as showing Epst ein ocum ent in the irst place In stea th on ly pertine nt questio is hether tur nin ov er the ov er nment ocument Pl ain ti ff so mehow forc es Epst ein to provide testim ony to the gov ernm ent in contraventio of riv ilege against self inc ri minat ion uar anteed by the Fi fth Amendment Thi uest ion ca only eason abl be answ er ed i the neg ati Al so it hout meri is Epst ein ar ument hat hese re uest a re the same eq uest the nder si ned pr ev iou sl found su bje ct to the Fi fth Amendment Epst ein esp pp This i ot he ase The ear li er re uest re ferenc ed by Eps tei er ig nific antl br oader than the ar ro eq uest a i ss ue her i ncl udi ng for ample a eq uest for a ll doc uments relating to the ede ral non-p rosecu tion a gr eem ent all docum ent elatin to Epst ein?s Florida uil ty pl ea a nd al document btai ned i inv est ig ati on ela ti ng to ei ther the ede ral or state cr imina investig ation hese requests ould have req uired Ep stein to pick and choo se hich do cum ent were resp onsive a nd in this ay orce Epst ein to ef ectively make use of the cont ent of hi mind an ac ti on th at oul unden iab ly i mpli cat the ifth Amendment See Hub bel a Epst ein al so ra is es je ct io on the basi the or ro duct doc tr ine and the a ttorney cl ien pr iv il eg obj ect ion the bas is of the a ttor ney cl ien pr iv il eg and the or ro duct doc tr ine ar eje cte out of hand att or ney li ent ri il eg pr otec ts onfidenti al communi cat ion bet een a law er and his cl ien for the ur pose of obtai nin leg al adv ic Fi sher nit ed St ates Sc hal tenbr and F.2d Cir cert denied S.Ct In re Grand Jury Subpoena Bi er man 1th Ci Und er the ru le onl mater ial Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of a a te i i fy i i i ckma Tay involv ing conf iden tial com mu nicatio ns bet een the atto rney and the client hich all ithin the ur iew of the ri il eg ar ender ed i mmune ro di sc ov er Fi sher at The docu ments at i ss ue her er iv en by the over nm ent to Ep stein and as such are clearly not con iden tial com mu nicatio ns prote cted by the atto rney client riv ilege The ork pr oduct doct ri ne hic pr otec ts from dis cl osur doc uments and tang ibl thi ng re par ed in anti i pa ti on of i ti at i on by or for a pa ty or by or for th at pa ty at to ne ac ti ng fo his cl ien Fed iv In re Grand TD Jury Procee dings F.2d 5th Cir is also not im plicate as the subject docu me nts ere no create by Ep stein?s attor ney Id Fi nal ly Ep ste in ar ues the i nformati on soug ht i ro tec ted fr om di sc los ur by ule and of the Fede ra Rul es of ide nce ov er nin the a dmis si on i nto ide nce of cu ts in volvin se tt le dis cu ss io an le a ne got ia ti Pla in ti a ck wled ge that Req uest umber mi ht at om poi nt be im licated by the Rule but th ey are cor re ct hen hey av ail thems elv es of the br oad feder al dis cov er ule a nd ar ue th at he inf orma tion so ught hile it a lt im a ely be arred rom se at trial is non eth eless je is lo re a in a is a ge im I Sander Ac cor din ly Ep ste in is or der ed to pr oduce the me i i a fr a Plaint i ff?s ot i on om pe a i el at es th ec on at eg or do um en ts financi al infor mati on doc uments Req uest and i eni ed on the asi the Fi th A endment In sus tai nin Eps tei n?s ifth A mendment pr iv il eg he our has cons ide re the facts al leg ed i the omplai nts he el ements needed to conv ic Ep ste in of Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of a crime the pa rt ic ula ri ed how ing made i Eps tei n?s espon se Br ief and in cam era subm ission an drawn up on the Co urt?s kn owl edge of he cases at issue On this basis the Court inds th priv ilege raised a Requests valid and asserted by Epste in onl it eferenc to genui nel thr eateni ng uest ion nit ed St ates oodw in 2d th ir In uli ng as i doe the our finds that or der ing Epst ein to pr oduce the i nformati on sought inf orma io wh ich relates to pote ntial vi olatio ns of ede ral law and claims cons ti tutes tes ti monial di sc los ur es that oul ommunic ate sta tements a a nd pr esent a eal and subs tanti al dang er of sel f-in cr imi nati on i both this case and other re lat ed ases that coul re sul in cr imi nal pr osec uti on Fi sher at oti ng that th Fifth A ve rs it a io wh re a ro in a ic a ive aspec i a i fr a Th dang er Epst ein a ce bei ng forc ed to tes ti fy in thi i nst ance is subs tanti al and eal and not merel tr ifli ng or i mag ina ry as req uir ed Apfelbaum Ac cor din ly findi ng the ubj ect eq uest i nv olv ompell ed tatement hat oul furni sh a li nk in the hai of ev ide nce needed to onv ic Ep ste in of a cr ime the Cou rt finds Eps tei n?s ifth A mendment pr iv il eg lai ali dly as ser ted Accor din ly Epstei n?s object ion is sus tai ned and he ne ed not produ ce do cum ent subject to the se Requests The thi rd ca teg or of document eq uest ed co si sts of Epst ein per sonal tax returns or the year ro gh he resen Request No an a cop of Epste in?s U.S Passp ort Request No laintif Motio as it rela tes to bo th th ese request is ra nted Onc ag ain he ifth A mendment pr iv il eg again st sel f-in cr imi nati on does not ex tend to do cument hose ex is tenc i now to th go vern ment or i a foreg one conclu sion Fisher at Hubb ell U.S at Pon ds 3d at D.C Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Ci I thi i nst ance the ov er nment namely the IR a lr eady has Eps tei n?s tax re tur ns so i can har dly be i ncr imi nati ng for pst ein to pr oduce them Id The ame i ru of Epste in Pass por Si nce Epst ein is re uir ed to how hi ass por Gov er nment off ic ial er ti me he ra els outs ide the Uni ted Stat es the Gov er nment undeni abl has ri or kn ow led of th a ss por is tenc an i ts her eabouts i a foreg one conc lus ion ubbel a Ev en mor per suas iv i he fact that tax re cor ds and pas spor ts co nsi der ed by the cour ts to be re uir ed ecor ds ar as a mat ter of law deemed not subj ect ifth Am end me nt prot ection See e.g Rajah ukase F.3d 2d Cir Jus as a ax pay er forms ar eq uir ed ecor ds not ubj ct to he ifth Amendment bec ause they are a mandator part of a ci il eg ula tor eg ime so too ar the passp orts at i ssue in the current case In Doe F.2d Cir rd erin pr oduct ion of forms ov er ifth A mendment ob jec ti on on ro unds of re uir ed ecor ds ex cept ion In re Doe ame Epst ein?s reliance on U.S.C governing th conf iden tiality of tax returns does li ttl to aid Eps tei n?s ca use The same federal sta tute Epst ein ci tes as ci ted the clai ma nt he i i eg i th as es efe ed ab ov an i ea of he he ou rt?s ru led that the confide nti ali ty pr ov ide by the IR sta tute as pr oper ly ov er ri dden the br oad feder al di sc ov er ule Id Acc or din ly Ep ste in ifth A ent lai of pr iv il eg as i ela tes to thes eq uest i eje cte and Epst ein has ten day fr om the date her eof to pr ov ide the dis cov er su bje ct to hese Req uest The la st cat gor of do cu ts co ce rn Ep st in ica re co rd ro Dr St ephen Al ex ander Req uest Epst ein ais es sev er al obj ect ion thi ateg or of Req uest from ele ancy conc er ns to pr iv il eg cl aims Bec ause Pl ain ti ff has fail ed to ar ti cul ate a ny Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of re asona ble bas is for obtai nin the document in uest ion Pl ain ti ff oti on as i ela tes to this request is den ied hile the scope of discovery i ro ad it is not ithou limits ashin gton Brow illiam oba cco F.2d th Cir Ind eed the Am end me nt to Rule has ef ectively limited the scope of discoverable infor mati on to thos matt er hic a re rel ev ant a lai or defense in the aw sui Del lac asa LLC ohn or iar ty A ss Fl or ida Inc at la Courts have long held tha hile th tan dard of relev ancy in discovery is a liberal one it is not so liberal a allow a party to roa in the sh ado zone relev ancy and ex plo re matte hic does not pr esent ly appear er mane on the heor that it mig ht conc eiv abl bec ome so ood Li on I nc nit ed ood Commer ci al or ker I nter Uni on 3d A uoti ng Br oadw ay a ine ty Si th tr eet Realty Lo ew I nc F.R.D S.D N.Y Dona hay Palm Be ach ours ransp Inc at S.D Fla Accordingly Plaintif Mo ti on as i ela tes to Req uest i eni ed Epst in has ais ed det ail ed obj ect ion to he eq uest among othe thi ng alling i nto uest ion the re lev ancy of his medi cal condi ti on i thi ase her ac cor din to him he as not lac ed hi medi cal co ndi ti on at is sue Thi ar ti cul ar obj ect ion as met by Plai nti ff it sil ence In ig ht of the obj ect ion ma de ps te i ai nt i ffs er ob i at ed om ba i th ei ep a nd a ti ul at om ration al basis or see king the records requeste Having ailed in th is reg ard Pla intif Mo ti on as i rel ates to Req uest No is de nie and Epst ein need not ro duce document re spons iv to thi eq uest In ac cor dance it the abov and foreg oin i i er eby OR DERED A ND A DJUDGED as ol ow Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Pl ain ti ff Moti on to ompel Answ er Pl ain ti ff ir st Req uest for ro duct ion D.E an is GRA NTED IN PA RT A ND ENIED IN PA RT in accor dance it the er ms her ein Pl ain ti ff oti on to Compel Answ er Pl ain ti ff ir st Req uest for A dmis si ons D.E an is DE NI ED and Plaintif Motion to Com pel Answers to I nte rrogatories D.E and is DE NI ED DONE A ND ORD ERED thi ebr uar in Cha mbers at est Palm Beac Fl or ida LIN TD NE A OH NS ON UN TD ITED STATES AGIS TRATE UD GE CC TD he Hon orab le Ken net A Marra All Counse of Record Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of
23,285 characters
