Case Document Filed Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA GIUFFRE Plaintiff against GHISLAINE MAXWELL Defendant APPEARANCES Counsel for Plaintiff BOEIS SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP Civ SEALED OPINION East Las Olas Boulevard Suite Fort Lauderdale FL By Sigrid Mccawley Esq Meredith Schultz Esq Counsel for Defendant HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN P.C East Tenth Avenue Denver CO By Laura A Menninger Esq Jeffrey Pagliuca Esq Counsel for Respondent Sharon Churcher DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Avenue of the Americas st Floor New York NY By Eric Feder Pennsylvania Ave NW Suite Washington DC By Laura Handman Case Document Filed Page of Sweet D.J Non-party Sharon Churcher Churcher a professional journalist has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure to quash the subpoena served upon her by Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell Maxwell or the Defendant to testify at a deposition in this civil action and to produce documents the Subpoena relying upon the New York Reporters Shield Law N.Y Civ Rights Law Section Upon the conclusions set forth below the motion of Churcher is granted and the Subpoena is quashed I Prior Proceedings On June Churcher was served with the Subpoena commanding her to appear at a deposition on June The Subpoena also commands Churcher to bring with her to the deposition several broad categories of documents All Documents containing communications with Virginia Roberts All communications with any agent for Virginia Roberts including without limitation attorneys Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell David Boise sic Sigrid Mccawley Meredith Schultz Stanely sic Pottinger Ellen Brockman Stephen Zac Brittany Henderson Bob Josefsberg Katherine Ezell Amy Ederi Case Document Filed Page of All Documents containing communications with Jason Richards All Documents containing communications with law enforcement agency concerning Virginia Roberts All Documents reflecting any payment of any money to Virginia Roberts All Documents reflecting any contract concerning Virginia Roberts II Facts Relating to Churcher and the Parties to this Action Churcher is a professional print journalist who has worked continuously in New York since Churcher Deel i She is currently employed by American Media Inc which publishes the National Enquirer the Enquirer and RadarOnline.com Radar where she has worked since November Id From through October she was employed as the New York-based Chief American Correspondent of The Mail on Sunday a publication owned by Associated Newspapers of London England During the interim she worked as a freelance reporter for publications including The Mail on Sunday the U.S operation of its digital arm the Mail Online and the Enquirer Id In her capacity as a journalist Churcher has reported on the events that underlie this case going back to at least April Case Document Filed Page of when she wrote an article published in The Mail on Sunday about the alleged ties between Prince Andrew the British royal and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein Epsteinu Ex Maxwell was mentioned in that article See Id Churcher first reported about the plaintiff Virginia Giuffre Guiuffreu or the Plaintiffu then identified as Virginia Roberts in March when she wrote a series of articles published in The Mail on Sunday and affiliated newspapers containing extensive interviews with and photographs of Giuffre in which she agreed to waive her anonymity and tell for the first time her deeply disturbing story.u Churcher Deel Ex at see also Churcher Deel Ex Churcher traveled to Australia to meet and interview the Plaintiff in person for those stories Churcher Deel In January Churcher wrote a series of stories that appeared in several publications including The Mail on Sunday the Enquirer and Radar containing extensive new details from the Plaintiff about her involvement with Epstein Maxwell and Prince Andrew as well as excerpts from a handwritten diaryu about those experiences which appeared on Radars website See Churcher Deel Exs Case Document Filed Page of From through the present day Churcher in her capacity has a journalist has communicated extensively with the Plaintiff and in certain instances agents for Churcher including her attorneys Churcher Deel The and publications were authored by Churcher the Articles I The Applicable Standard Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure A a court must quash or modify a subpoena that i requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter if no exception or waiver applies or iv subjects a person to undue burden The party issuing the subpoena must demonstrate that the information sought is relevant and material to the allegations and claims at issue in the proceedings Night Hawk Ltd Briarpatch Ltd L.P No RWS WL at S.D.N.Y Dec citations omitted Once that initial burden has been met a party contending that a subpoena should be quashed pursuant to Rule A iv must demonstrate that compliance with the subpoena would be unduly burdensome Bridgeport Music Inc UMG Recordings Inc No Civ VM JCF WL at Dec Case Document Filed Page of IV The New York Shield Law Applies The New York Shield Law or reporters privilege protects reporters from compelled disclosure of both confidential information and sources as well as non-confidential unpublished newsgathering materials and information Under Federal Rule of Evidence in a civil case state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision Because this case concerns a state law claim that is in federal court because of diversity of citizenship evidentiary and discovery privileges are governed by New York law See Giuffre Maxwell No Civ WL at S.D.N.Y May citing inter alia Fed Evid Moreover Churcher is a New York-based journalist Churcher Deel Accordingly the New York Reporters Shield Law applies to the Subpoena See In re Application to Quash Subpoena to Nat Broad Co Inc F.3d 2d Cir applying New York Shield Law where subpoena in Massachusetts wrongful death suit issued out of Southern District of New York to a New York-based broadcaster While now codified in Section of the Civil Rights Law the reporters privilege has its origins in the New York Constitutions free press provision art I which Case Document Filed Page of provides the broadest possible protection to the sensitive role of gathering and disseminating news of public events ONeill Oakgrove Constr N.E.2d N.Y.2d quoting Matter of Beach Shanley N.Y.2d N.Y.S.2d N.E.2d Wachtler concurring see also In re Daily News L.P Misc 3d N.Y.S.2d Sup Ct The legislature enacted the statute now codified at Civil Rights Law Section and mooted any possible issues about the constitutional law conclusions of the Court of Appeals Indeed New York public policy as embodied in the Constitution and our current statutory scheme provides a mantle of protection for those who gather and report the news-and their confidential sources-that has been recognized as the strongest in the nation Holmes Winter N.Y.3d N.E.3d Accordingly the New York Shield Law provides protection of information obtained or received in confidence by a reporter as well as for the identity of a confidential source N.Y Civ Rights Law McKinney The statute also provides qualified protection for non-confidential newsgathering information which can be overcome only with a clear and specific showing that the information is highly material and relevant critical or necessary to the maintenance of a Case Document Filed Page of partys claim and not obtainable from any alternative source Id The qualified privilege is a stringent one that imposes a very heavy burden on any party seeking to overcome it In re Am Broad Companies Inc Misc 2d N.Y.S.2d Sup Ct For confidential information the privilege can be overcome by the same showing as for non confidential information under the Shield Law See Gonzales Natl Broad Co F.3d 2d Cir For non confidential information the party seeking disclosure must show that that the materials at issue are of likely relevance to a significant issue in the case and the materials at issue are not reasonably obtainable from other available sources Schoolcraft City of New York No CIV RWS WL at S.D.N.Y Apr quoting Gonzales F.3d at A Information Received Pursuant to Promises of Confidentiality is Absolutely Privileged Under the Shield Law The Shield Law provides an absolute privilege against the compelled disclosure of news obtained or received in confidence or the identity of the source of such news N.Y Civ Rights Law McKinney The statute thus bars compelled Case Document Filed Page of disclosure of news or its source obtained in confidence Baines Daily News L.P Misc 3d N.Y.S.3d N.Y Sup Ct collecting citations Holmes Winter N.Y.3d N.E.3d The Shield Law prohibits a New York court from forcing a reporter to reveal a confidential source Flynn NYP Holdings Inc A.D.2d N.Y.S.2d if the requested documents were deemed confidential defendants would be afforded unqualified protection from having to divulge such sources or materials At a minimum the Shield Law would absolutely preclude any inquiry into the identity of confidential sources on which Churcher relied in reporting the Articles or any information that may reveal those sources identities On their face many of the Articles rely on confidential sources including law enforcement sources See e.g Churcher Deel Ex at a source id Ex at a law enforcement source id Ex at massage therapist who does not wish to be named id Ex at a legal expert a source familiar with the case Churcher has stated in her declaration that in reporting the Articles she relied extensively on information received in confidence as well as sources whose identities are confidential Churcher Deel To the extent any Case Document Filed Page of communications with those sources fall within the categories of the document requests those communications are absolutely privileged from disclosure Moreover although the Plaintiff was plainly a non-confidential on-the-record source for several of the Articles to the extent she provided Churcher with any information on a confidential basis that information would also be absolutely privileged See Baker Goldman Sachs Co F.3d 2d Cir New Yorks Shield Law provides journalists an absolute privilege from testifying with regard to news obtained under a promise of confidentiality The Information Sought by the Subpoena is Protected by the Qualified Privilege I mportant interests beyond confidentiality are served by the reporters qualified privilege including the privacy of editorial processes and the pres independence in its selection of material for publication in accordance with the broader public policy of encouraging the free flow of information and avoiding a chill on the press Pugh Avis Rent A Car Sys Inc No WL at S.D.N.Y Oct The Privilege therefore protects the independence of the press and the need to allow the press to publish freely on topics of public interest without harassment Case Document Filed Page of and scrutiny by litigants seeking to conduct fishing expeditions into unpublished materials in the hope that some relevant information may turn up Id at In ONeill the New York Court of Appeals stressed the need for courts to exercise particular vigilance in safeguarding the free press against undue interference and preventing undue diversion of journalistic effort and disruption of press functions N.Y.2d at discussing New York Constitution article I from which the Shield Law derives See also Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp Wigand No WL at N.Y Sup Ct Feb Attempts to obtain evidence from journalists as nonparties would if unrestrained subject news organizations to enormous depletions of time and resources as well as seriously impede their ability to obtain materials from confidential sources affd A.D.2d N.Y.S.2d st Dept Similarly in recognizing that the First Amendment reporters privilege also applies to non-confidential newsgathering information the Second Circuit has explained that the reporters privilege reflects broader concerns beyond the confidentiality of a reporters sources noting that the Case Document Filed Page of privilege is designed to protect against the burdens that would accrue if it were to become standard operating procedure for those litigating against an entity that had been the subject of press attention to sift through press files in search of information supporting their claims Gonzales F.3d at The court explained further that those harms include burdening the press with heavy costs of subpoena compliance increased requests for anonymity from sources anxious to avoid being sucked into litigation and the symbolic harm of making journalists appear to be an investigative arm of the judicial system the government or private parties Id New York courts have pointed out that the legislatures express purpose in passing the Shield Law was to avoid problematic incursions into the integrity of the editorial process In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Served on Nat Broad Co Inc Misc 2d at quoting McKinneys Session Laws Memorandum of State Executive Department See also United States Cuthbertson F.2d 3d Cir The compelled production of a reporters resource materials can constitute a significant intrusion into the newsgathering and editorial processes Moreover in seeking testimony to support their theory of the case the plaintiffs inevitably would have to ask questions regarding the Case Document Filed Page of reporters techniques for conducting his investigation the backgrounds of co-authors and the publications editorial staff and whether the author consulted with any experts or other sources in the course of the investigation-all inquiries into the newsgathering process protected by the Shield Law Baker F.3d at internal quotation marks omitted Although none of that information is confidential the unpublished details of the newsgathering process are nevertheless protected by the Shield Law and where the testimony is not critical or necessary to maintain the plaintiffs claims a motion to quash must be granted by the district court In re Eisinger No WL at S.D.N.Y Apr affd sub nom Baker Goldman Sachs Co F.3d 2d Cir In such circumstances it is virtually self-evident that the Shield Law would protect a journalist from compelled testimony Baker at In her Response Maxwell raises two arguments why the information she seeks is not protected from disclosure that the Shield Law does not apply at all because at some point Churcher ceased to be a reporter with respect to the Plaintiff and to the extent the Shield Law applies Maxwell has met Case Document Filed Page of the three elements to overcome the qualified privilege for non confidential materials The Second Circuit instructs that in determining whether the reporters privilege applies the Court should look to the nature of the primary relationship between the respective parties to determine whether it has as its basis the intent to disseminate the information to the public garnered from that relationship von Bulow by Auersperg von Bulow F.2d 2d Cir That intent must exist at the inception of the newsgathering process Id at Here the primary relationship between Churcher and Plaintiff was that of a professional reporter gathering information from a source for the Articles that were in fact subsequently published under Churchers byline over the next several years In von Bulow the court held that the reporters privilege did not apply to notes that a woman Andrea Reynolds took while watching the criminal trial of Claus von Bulow nor to investigative reports she had commissioned about von Bulows wifes children Reynolds an intimate friend of von Bulows had stated that her primary concern in commissioning the reports was vindicating Claus von Bulow and her own peace of mind Id at Even if she later decided to Case Document Filed Page of collect the information and publish it in a book her intent at the time she gathered the information was not to publish it Subsequent decisions have concluded that the relevant time frame is not when any fact gathering for the subject of the subpoena began but when the information sought by the subpoena at issue was gathered In re McCray Richardson Santana Wise Salaam Litig Supp 2d S.D.N.Y emphasis and internal quotation marks removed Maxwell has failed to overcome the evidence establishing that Churcher was a professional journalist that her intent from the very beginning of her relationship with the Plaintiff was to gather information to publish news stories or that she did in fact publish many news stories based on the information she learned from Plaintiff and other sources over the next several years The primary relationship between them has always had as its basis the intent to disseminate the information to the public garnered from that relationship von Bulow F.2d at Successful journalists must cultivate extensive networks of sources and communicate with them regularly on a variety of topics See e.g United States Marcos No CR JFK WL at S.D.N.Y June The underpinning of the reporters privilege lies in the Case Document Filed Page of recognition that effective gathering of newsworthy information in great measure relies upon the reporters ability to secure the trust of news sources Indeed frequent often informal communication with sources even if not for the immediate purpose of gathering information for a specific article is an integral part of the overall newsgathering process Accordingly the Shield Law does not narrowly apply only to the specific exchanges where the source conveys news As the Second Circuit has held the Shield law protects journalists from inquiries into the newsgathering process as a whole Baker Goldman Sachs Co F.3d 2d Cir affirming holding that Shield Law applied to unpublished details of the newsgathering process such as who made calls and interviewed particular sources techniques for the reporters investigation and the backgrounds of the coauthors and editorial staff In any event the e-mails that Maxwell submits to demonstrate that Churcher was not acting as a journalist in fact show that even as she was consulting with the Plaintiff on seemingly separate topics her overarching intent remained newsgathering IJGD 5IJFFEA RQKHD AA HIGD TRJGD GGD URIFD BWRGC FFB ABAA I VRHFC CWQFDD BDCB EGFDBBCBCDCBAA BCDEFFEDBA I 1;CJMOPNIC AVRHFD 0DWPEFIGFILOPNJFB A ABCBA AABCBCBA AABBCCDEDDCDDEDCCBBA ABCEFGHGEDCBCDEEDCBA ABDCB HQH BDEDCCBBCDEFEDEFEEDCCBBAA DGILOQQKD LXRHGGECDEGHHGFEEFEDEFGFECB ACEE 1BROHIJHGJMPQNID 05BNOLKKHFHLNPLGB A A A CFILLKJIIJJKLLMNONMLJGC BFHC A AABCCDCDEEDB ACEGHIJKLLMNNOPPONKIFCA AFHC ADDBA CFIJKLMMNMKHFCA BFHD CEGIKJIGFDBA BDFGHIIHHGHIHGHFDA AA BCBBAA CEHIIHGC BDFFGFEFFGGFFEDBA ADFHIIHHJMOOKF ADFEDB AGJF A BCDEDDCA A A AEHIJKMPQKE CCBCDCBA DB ABBCBA DHIJJKLMQRLD BBCCBBA CGD ABA A GKHB;668 GJ6 A GLHB CE8 HMH TPGB A GLG FKG A VSJE ABA BCCBBA BCBA ABDEEDCBBA BCA BDCA BCEDCBA ACDA BZ CEDBA ABCDCCBAA BC EDB AA AA5 BFFEDB BFC A QDEHHFDB BEDDCCBA BAA BC2 ABBCDCDCBAA BCDCB A AABA BCBA A AABBA AA AEHGFC BDCB ABCEFGHIJKLMMLKLKJHHGFEDCBA BDEGHIKLMLKLLMMLKJHHGFEB ABCDDCB ABCDCCDEEFEDBA BDFGFFGHIIGDA BCEEFEEDCBBA ACFIKLNONPOLIGDA ABBCDEEDBA BDFHJLOQRQOMLKJIHGFDBA CGJHEB A ACGJNQTSRQQPONMKIGFECBA BEGEC CGJMNOPQRSTTUTSPNKGD BCEDDCCBBDFHJKLMLLJHC MWH77 ADHJKMNMNOPPNJGC AA ABCDDCA ADGILOQPOMKKJIIHGFECA CED BDFEEDDCBBABAA BEGEB AABBCCDDEFEECB ABDDCCBAA AA ACA BDB ABCBB BCDDCA CFHJLMLKJIHGFFEDCA ABA ACEFEB ABCBA NE89 BCDDCA ACEGHJKLKJHGFEDDCB AABCA BCCBA BDFFEB ABA OF99 ACDEDB CGJLKIHFFGFEDCB AA BDFGDA ABAA BCEEDB A CEFGEA ABA I BDEFECA AA CEGHE AA BDFGFDB AA AA CEHHE?:679 AA I BC BDFGGDB 1;ELLJFCDFGHGECACEGGA:3 2:AFC AA AA CFHIE?9568 AA OH CFGC BDGHGEB 8DLMJFCDFGHGDBACEGHB:2 19AFC CFHIE I NG BEFB ADFGFDA 7CLLIFCDEGHGDBABDGGA:3 19AFB A CFHID ND89 ACEFEB 5BLLIFCDEGHGDBABDEE 09AFB CEHID BDECA ACCB ABA 2?JKIFCDFGHGECA CEHHD AA 1?JKIFDDFGHGEDBA A ACEHHD BA A 1?IJIFDEGHHGFDBA A BDFHHEA ACCA A 0:CKLKJHIIJJIHGFEEDCBBA DJMJE A ADFIJKHD ABBA 01009ABABAA CB BHB AA ABA ABA BDEGHIJKJIHGFECA AEHKMOOPQQRRSTSRSSRPMJHEB ACCBA ABAA BCEDCA ACEGFGFFDCB KMLMOOPQQRSRQPPQPPONNMLKLKKHEA A ABCDEGHJKLMMNNOOPONMLKKIFB BFJMPQPONLIECDDA ADFFEDCIOPOQRRQOIC CEDA IIHKMNONMLMLKJIJJIFB CGJKLMLMLMLMNNMHC 876567898866COMJMQTTPLIFC ABDEFFEDBA ACEHJLMNOOPQQRQPPONMMLKJIFC ACDFFEDCBA BHEABDCA ABA BDCBBJRSQROG HA89 DKOPNJHGD ABCCDCCA CFHKLMNNOPQPOONMLLKKJIHFEDCBA A H9 98HVI FKNLJHFC AABA ABBCDCBBA A IUTPSVVUWWLA AA BBCMUK AA BRJ A SK A WL A 86AI XL A YM ZM VL RJ A F9 OJA OF9 ABA AABCDCB ACBA HSMEEGEDDEFGFEDDCBA ABA CEDCB ACA CEFII BDB CGIJJKLMNONMLKHEA ABCBBAA ABCDDEFGHIJKLLKIHGGFD AEIMOPQRRSTUUVUTSQPOMLKJIGB BDGIKMMNMNMLKJGDA BFIKLLMLKJFC CGJKJKLIEA BEHIHHIHGD JLKNQRSRSRQPOLHEBAABCBA AA HQKCDGHHGEDBA ABDEEFFEEDCA CB ABBA AABDEGKNRTRNKGEDBA ILMNMLKJKKLMNMLKKJIGDA CFIJKKLKHEB ACFHGGFDB BCDEFDCLRE77987640 JD EHIJIIHIHGGFFEDCBABAA ABCA AA ADGJMOPONONMLLKKLMMNOPPLIHGEDB ACEGHIHIIJJIIHIHHGFDCA BCEFGHIHHGECB ABDDEFECBA A ABCIL BCDCBA ACDCBBA BCBA ACBBA 75AK ABBA 7H 65AJ ABBA ABBA I 9G ACBA BCCB ACDDCB 87CM BDFEDCA 87CMD BDA ADFGGFECB 88DNF AA I BDGHHGFDCA 99EPG I ADA I A CEFFEDCA FQH A 9G I ACDDCCBBA ACDDCBA GRI AA AA I BEGFEDCB ABBA AA HSJ BAA AA BGJKJIGFEDB BBA A HRJ BBA I BHLMLKJIHHFECA BCEFFEDDCBBA A HQJ ACBA ABA A 87:?BEDA FD A FNH BA ABCCBBAA BA BCCBBA A ACCBA ABB ACEGHIJKKLKKJIIGFEDCBA ABBCCBA FMHAABA ADGJLMNMLJGDA DFIKMPRUWXWVUTSQPONLJGDB ACEFGHIJLMNNLKIHGFECA BDC ABCDFHIHFDBEGFEDCA ABBABCBBA AABBCBA ACDFHJKMNPQRSSRQPONLKIHGEC UOFJPRSSTSTTUVWWXYXWUTUUROTU AABA ABDFHLNQRRSSRRQPONMKKJHGFEA KT IC BCDEDDCDDEEFGGHIHGEDDEA KS A A A ABBCEHKNQPOONNMLLKJJIHFIKC CE A DGKNONMNONOPOPOPOPONOPOPNKIFDB BCDEFGHGGLOKEEGFEDBA ABBCDDEDDCBA CJB9 BU ABA A IA79 AT BU 5A ABA K9 ABA UC IO ABCBA IO ABCBA HO ABCBA 1;HO ABCCBA NA 9FM A 6D 9EL 6EJLMLJGHG;.042 HHEGHGFHIKJC FORSQNOL7 336JZOBFMOQQPOLHC EJ91 A 349JYRHLQSTSPI ABAA A I CLTVWWVTRQM 25;HTSOQTUUVSI 7CJ ABCDCBCDEGGECA A 05;DMQRTUUTSQKE DHC AA A CIOSTTSRQOMJFB A CJB89 ABCBAA EME ABAA ABCA GPF AABA AA A ABA ACDFGIJKJIGFHJLNNMLJHFDCFJNPLF ADHJLMNNMLLKKJKLNOPRRQMHB AABCBABAA ABCDDCBA AACDEFGIKMPQPNKJKMOOJC BEGIKMNMMLLKKLNOPRSSRMF?71 A ABBCDEFGFECBAA DKRWWURPOONLGB GMG ADFGFFDB 2:BHJIIHHIHHGHHIIJJKKLKJIHFC ADFFECBA ABCEFFDA BDCDHNTXWTPNOPOLE DJKLLMNOOPQRSSTSRQPNJGDCBBAA A AEHKLMLKKJJKLMNPQQPJC ABCDEDCBA ABDFHJLOQSRQOMIEDDBA A HQWXVSPOMKHC?:7679 BEFEB ABDDEFGFEDCBBA ABCA AABBA?;63 ABA A ACFJMPSRPNKD FPWXVTQNKHDA ABDFFECA AEHJLMNMLLJIHD A BDDEECA FNTVUSOMJGC?;865679 ACDEDBA FLH GLQTTRNLIFC?;7445679 I ABA EJG CHMPSTQMKHFB A A CFILOPOMKHEB?;855679 BCCBA I IPNJFB CDCCA BB AA AA EC AA 0CSRLGA AB 9MJA AABBA ABA ACC CC ABAA AUTLGA AB 8KIB ABCB ABCB BDD BB AABAA AWTLGA AA 7JHB ABCCDDCBA ACDC CEE 4;ABA A AA WUMGB EFDCA 7JH BBCBA AA ACC AA VUMGB BBCCBBA BB AA AA 4;ABA BGKNRSSPMJE?:6567899 ABBA VUMHC BCBA 9LH A ABCBA VUMHC A 9MI ACDCA VUMHCA AA NI CHLORTSPNKHEB BCB VUMHDBBAA AA 8FQC47 BAA OI BA EIMPRSSQNLIGDB ABCCA UTNJFCA 65AKC9 DEEDCCDDCBA ACEEDDCBA A AABBA BEFFEDCBA AABCDFHIKNQSTSQOMJHECBA A 1CSSPMIEA FC DJLKJIJIHFDA ABBCDCCBAA BB ABAA 6EQRPNKIFDBA BEDCBBA AABA ACDFGFEDCCBBA AFLPQQPOMLJIGFEDCBCCDEEFFECA A A AABCBA CGJKLKKLMMNOOPPQQPONMMLLKLKGB ABCDEFGHIJHGGILNQRTUUTRQNID CGIJKKJKLLMMNOOPPQQPOMLKLLKGB A BCDCB ABCDEFGHGFDDFJMPRTUTRNF BCEFGHIIJKLLMNONMLKJGC ABCCDDEFFEFFEDCCDEEFEEDCA BHI0 4KE ABCBBAA DLROID BCDCBA A BHMQTWXWUQH ABCDEGIKMNONMLKIE A EJKJIHEC CGKNMLMMLMLLKKJJIHGFEFEC 3J GMSWYZYUK?4 DINQRQOMMLKID AA A LG BGLPSWYYNA4 A ABCBA AEHJLNRWZZPB5 BEGKNQSRPNLJF BCCBA CFIKMPSU?3 AA 5PD1 ACCB ACEGIKMKD;1 2:AEB 5PC0 ABCB 2:AE A ABCB 7PB BDECA AEC 9QB 8KF BDFGEB DJHC AA AA 9RB 9LH ADFHIGDA AA ABBAA BA SC LH CEGIJHEB ABA AA 8KG ACFGHFC A A 0CKOSTROMKD 7JF ACEEDA A 4KOOSWWUSPIDR 7KG BDDCA 5POIOTVUTSMIOSE6330 2NNINSTSPMMLA51 EA81 1LKEJOONOONMKJD HNKE ABCEFGHIHGEDBA ABCCB ACEFGHIJKJIHGGFEDCCBBA BDEFGFFEEDEFFGGFFEEDCDB FLRVVUSRSTUVUTTSSRQQPONLG BFIMPSTUUVUTTUTSRRQPNMKHEA A A AABBDGKNQQPONNMLKJIGFGFECB BDEFEDCBAA 7543454323:BJQQPNMLLKJFA CGKOQRPOMJGDA ABA A ACCDHLKIGEDDCDEDDCCBBA ACEC ABCEHKNPQRSQOMJGC ABCDCBCDEGIJKMNOPQQPQOLJFB CGKOQQPNLIFC A CHLOPQQRRQQPPONOPQRRQKE DLQOIC AEHLOQPOMKHEB ADGJLNOPQPQPOPOPOPQPOPONMJFB ADFHJKMMNONNRTE6;B GQH DLQPKGBA BCBA BEILOQPNLJGDA ADFIJJKMSU MD79 BEHKMOPQRSTUTTRPLGB CEHKMOPQQOMJF ACCBA ABCBBA BEILOPPNKIFB ND78 BEHKNOPQQRSTTUTSRQLF 18IE ACCA A AEHLNPOMKHDA AA 9GB;?DEFFE KUF411 ABBCDDCCBA ABCDEFEDCBA AZWOQSQNOPMJRUA ACDEFGFEDCA AA CZWNOPMJKMKIQT ABCEFGHIHGFECB ABCDCBBA AABCCDEFEFEDCB ABCCBA A BYVNJFHKJIPS ABCEFGIJJIIGFEDBA A AABAA QSQQPKGILSVF66 CEEDCBABCB A AABA DHIJJKLLMMNONMLLKJKMMKD:0 CFHIHHGFEFGFGGFDC ABCBAA 05;BHLPSUVUUTSSRQRSTSROMJGEBA ABCDCBBAA 4:AFKQUQKD AA ABA ADGJKLMNOPQPONNMLJIGFDCA ABA 05;ENRTPIB ABCEGHIKLKKJJIHGGEDCCBA ABBCDEFGFGHIJJIIHFDCA AABCDFGHIJKLKJIGFDB 16DRTQMH ABBCDEDDCCBAA AABCDEDCBA ABAA AEFGGHHIIJIHHGEB ACDEGHHIHFDB 0DVUOKF?88 ABCCDCA AA BEC A ABDDEEDB CYVMIE AB A A CFHKMPRSRPMJGECA CA AA AXVLHD;447 AABBAA 2?DGKNRTTRPLHECA BEB OPNNORTTRNID GJD CKROIC 0:CIF FJD 0AQOHB EID;2 OME 09BGD EIC;2 VUMIE 8MKC 09BGC DHC;2 WUMJF PMC 2;CHD DHC;2 BTTNKG?99 16DQSPMHA A BDEDB 1--EZTG BFC CGC CGJLMQSOJD ABCB CZUH?768 A ADA DGJLNNQROJE AA BYUIA:9 BDGJLNOPQRNJEA A XUKC BEHKLNOPQMJFBA ABCB QPKFBBCDEEDCA ADA ACA ACB BDEFEFEDCBBA BHKNPRSRQPQPPME;1 ABCDEFEDCBAA DKD AABABCBABBA NNKGDEGIJIIHGGFGFEFEDDCBAA 39?EHKNPQPONMJGDA 5BLMLIGHJLMMLMOQRSRQPPONJEA ABCBA AA BCCBA AABCDFGHKORTUTSRQPONLKJIGEDBAA AABAA AABCEGILOQSUVWVVUTRPNLIFB A ABBA BCDFGHIJJKKLKKJIHGFFEDBA EJNOOLHGEDCBAA BFIJLLMOPQQNJEA AA ABCEHKMNNMKHFDA BEIMPSTTSRRQPQPPONJFB AGLORTVVWWVVUTSQNLIEA ACDEFGHIJIHHGFEDCCBAA ABBCCDCB ADCCEHJLMOMIFB ACDEFEDCDCBA ACEFGGFFEEDCA ABCCDCBBA CGKMMNMJGC AA ABA A ABB IM8 A JN ABBA CA ABBA AA JO JM IL9 ADA GJ7 ADA BDB AB GI83 CJL BA ADFC A BGMOA1 ADEDDEEDCCBA A ABA ACEC A AABBA ABCBA ABBCDCA BDGHJKLMOPOG?:754569 A A ABBCDDCBA BDEDB ABA ABBCDCA ABABA A AABBA AABBCCEGIKLKKJIGFECBA BGJKLLMNMLKJJIHEB ABCCBB BEFHIKKLMLGB ADFGHHGDA 975445:?EIKJJIHGFECB ABDEFGGFDCA ABDGILLMMLLKJHD ABB ABDFGHIJJKKJKJJIE ADGIJIIHGFB?;989::;:9 IUH99 BBA ABCEGHJKLMMLGA;689 CEB ACDEGHIHFECA ABA AABCA CDC BCDDCBA AC A ACBA AEILNNOOQSTSLD AABA EJGA;669 ADFC BCCBAA CDDBA BGKLMMNPSUUNE ABAA ABAA CGIE ADCCBAA ABBA DHD A BCBBAA DHC:2 DIE AEGC A 7CLH CGB:1 2;CHD 7AHE CGB91 1:BGC 9DLG DHC:1 1:BHC CEA A EID;2 2:CHD BA AA DFC ACB A ABAA FJE DHD DFC CEDA DGC ACEGEC AD A HOJ ABCB ELH 9DLH A AABBCDB 9DNE ABABA BCDEDCCBAA ABCCDDB DGD BDEEDEFC ABBCCBA ABBCCDCBBCDEEFGGFB 5CMMID ADHKLMNNONMLMMNOOPOPQRRPJB:3 ADGJLNNOOPONMNOOPPQPQRQNID AEIMOPQRSRPOLJHECA CGJKMNNONMNMNMMLKJHECA BCEFGGFFEDCBBAA ACDEA FJMOPQRSSRQOLJGDB CGJLMLLJIGECBA A DGJMOQRQPONOQRTTSTSRQMID BDFHKMPQRQOMJE BDFHJLMNMLKLMLKJIGDA BDEDCBB DILNOPQRSSQOLIFC ABCBAABA CEDFGIJJIHGFEDDEEDEDCBA BDEDCBA ABCDCBAA FQI A ACDDCBA 976;AGMNOPQRRPNKHEB ABAA BHMNMLKHEB AA CBA BEHJLLMLKIGDA AA AA ABBAA BEC ABDEEB ABCCBA FLQQPONNPQQOLJGDA ACFHJGD A A AACCDDA AB DJPTSQNKLNOPNKHFC FJHD ABCEEDDCB ABBCCBA UB A AFLQTROKHIKNONKHEB EIGB ABA A A BFIKIEA?CGLONKHDB DHE A GQRNJEB AABBA 9GRRNJEB 2:BHC A GRROJEB 2:CHD A A HSSOJEB A 8F A HSSOJEB EKG A AABA ISSOJEA AB AA;2 JTTOJEA BA ABCA BB;2 ABCDCBA AA90 KUVRNJGDA ACB ABDED CEE DEFEEDDCBAA 1?LVWURNLJGEDDCBBA ACCB ACB ABCEFGEA A CEFFC BDEFGHIHHGGFEDCA DA ADFFDCA A BDCB ABCCDEGHIIHGFDCBCDEGHIKJKJIGDB ABA A A ABCDCB BDFECB AFJNNMLKJIJMONMLLKJIHHIIJKJIG ACDDEFGFFEEDDCDDEFEDCBA ABDEFEEDCBAA ACFIKIFCA A A CGLOQRSSQOLJHFDEFGHJKLJHFDBAA BCBCDDEDCBA ABCCDCB FLNOPRSRQPOONMNOPPQPNLIGDA ABDCCBBAA CFIKNPQQOMJHEB BCEGHJJIGECA ABBCCBBA VPSWYZUNGA NPPSUVUTUUTSQOMLKLKJHEA ACDCCBAA CFILLKJIFB ACEGHIHGECA HQ A AA JA67 A CFEDDCCBCCDEEFGFEFEDCCDDEFEEA LVNCDHIHEA BCDEFEDCBAA A ACCBBA BDFGHGFDB FM AABA ABCDEFGFGGHIJKJJIKMLKIFDA I ABAA CEFGFECA ABCB ABCDEFGHHIJKLLMLKLLHEEFC I H8 A BDFGFDB ABA ABBCCEFGHGHHIJKMOPNMOOD I A ACEFFDB I AEF:.5 A CEFFDB ACFIKJIGFEFFGILORQPTS CIJ9 A BEFFDB BB AA BEHIHEB ADGJOSUR ADJL:2 BCBBA A KUVQ BEFFDB AA EEB A ACD 127HWWO FFECAABA AEGFDB BBA A AA EYWM F9 19AGGECABBCCBA AEGFEC ACCBA A A CXVL ADFFEC BDDCBA EECA A EFDCBBCBA ADFFECA ACEEDCBA A ADFFECA BDEDCBA BCBBA SSK I I ACBCBA ACEFEDCBA ABA I BIJ7 AABBCBBA BDFGFFEDCBA ABCBA I AGI6 ABBCBBAA ADFFDB ACEGHGFEDDBA A BDEDCB QRJ7 FH5 ABCBA AEGFDA BDFHIHHGFEDCB CEFEDCA I FH6 I BCDDCCBA BFHGDA BCEGIJIIHHGFECBA BDFGGFECBA QOG;05 JA57 JC ABCDCB FND89 ABA ABDEFGFFEEDDCBCBA A ABDFGHGFEDCA QNE BBAABABABCBB??FKF ACDCA ABBCDEFGIJIHGEA;61 AABCDEFFGGHIJKKLKKID?94 AABCCDDEEDDCCBBA ABCBAA BFIJJKLMLKJKLLMNMMLKKJIHGD CBCEILOPONKHEBBCDDB AKROJJLNQSUVWWXWWVUSOID A A AA BDFIKLMLKLLMMOPRRQPMJE BEGGHIJLMNMKJHIJKLKKJIIHGECA ACEFGEDCA 99EOF ACDEFGHHIIJIJIIHGGFDB AABA ABDEEDDCB BCDEGJKLKIGEFGHIHHGFEDCB A ACDFEDCA BDEGHIJLOQROLHFEFGHIHIHGFDCA ABCCBAA AABCCDEFGFEEDCCBAA ABCDEDBA BGKMOPPOMKIE ACA ABB AB ABA ABCCDCBA ABEGJKIEA ABA ABA CDDEDCBBAA ACD A CEB ABCCBBA 97DN ABBA BBA BFIJF EN A AA EKMLE 9EM IMJ CFHD QPF5 CE A SRH6 75AK AABA 86CM ABBCCBA DFC AWXO BD AABCBA BC AABCBA AA AWYQ ABBCCBA ACA BCBA UWO AABCCB A ACFGHGFECA AABCCB CFHJHGDA QRK9 ABA ADEDCA QRJ 99DNE ABA AABA A RRJ A ABBCBA ACDCCBBAA ACDEGGHFDB ABCDDEDDCA 7PPIFDA BCEDCCBA ABA AABCB BFJMOPQPQRRPH ABCCDEDBA AA CFIKNOPQQRQRRQPLGB A ACDCBA AABA AABBCDDEFFGFECB BDFHIIHFECB BDFHKMPQQOMJHFDBAA ACEHKMOQRRPNKIGGFEDCBAA ACEHJKLNPRQPPOMLKIHGGHHGD CGJLNPQQOLIEB A CFIKMOPMJLOONNMMLKJIHGEB ABCBA ABBCDEDCBAA ABBCDEGIHEFEFGHHIHGFDB ACEB ABA BDFHJLNOPOMKIHGFDA ADFILNMMJHOUOHIKLKLJGDB CFIJKNOG?EMNMNOPOLIFCA ABDFHIJLMOPQPMJGEDB ABAA ACDEFGHKNQRPMIFCA BCB BCDDEFJNQSPLHDA 8?CA BCIORSPLFB GNRTPKE DLQTPJC AVRH YUH A VI XI G_YJ DXK AZWLD AB ABA WUMGBA VVPMJFC A A A AABCCDEDEEDCA;5 TTNJGFEDB 9QSPONKHDBABA ABCDDA DGHIIJIHGECA BEGIIHCANYK:9 BDGJKKJIIHHGHIJKJKJIHFEEFFGHGE ABBA A 863012.-?RSOMLJIGFCA A BDFHJKJGB BHMNMLLKJKLMNMLMLKJIHHIIJKLKID ABCDEDDCDCBA BCDEDCCDCCBBA ABCBA AEHKNQTWYXTMF BHMNMLMMNOONMLLKKLMMNLID ABA BCEHJLMNOPQOLIFCA AABA ACDDCBABAA ABCDDCBA A ADCA A AA BEHJHEB DINQSTSROKGC ADFILNNOONOPRTWXWVTROMKE 9764358;?CFILMNPQQOMKIKMONF;0 A ABA ABCDEFGFFEEDEDCBA AABABBCCDEDCA BEB ACEFHJKMLKJKLMNOONNMNONMMKIGEA A AABCDEG?6678 ACEFEDDCBCDDCBA A ABDDECA CEGIKJJIIHIJKMNNMLMMNNMLKJGEB ACDC AA A BEC BCDEDB AFFECAA AA FID ABBCDCBA AA BILIB BDFEEDCA BDEFEEFGHGEA ACBBABCBCCDEEFEEDDCCBA AABDEECA DHKKJIHGGFFEDEFGGEB BFKMJE BBA ABBCBBA AABA ABCCDEHLOQOKGDDEFGHGFGFEDBA A ABABCEFHJKLMMLKJIGFEDDCBA BBA ABA AEHMQUWVTQOKHEBAA ABCBA A AABDFILOPQPOLKLMKHGFDCBAA BDGIKLKJHFDB ACDFGIJKLMLKIHGFFGFEDCBBCCDCA AEILOQOMJHGECB BCCBBAA ACDFHIIJIIHGFDB ADFIJIGEC ACDEFGGH BEHIJKKLMLKJIGFDCBAA A FLPTWXWTPJC ABDDCDEEFEEDCCBA BFIIJIJIJGDA A I IA67 Case Document Filed Page of Because Churcher has established that she was and is a journalist using Plaintiff as a source the Subpoena is quashed as a consequence of the protections of the Shield Law Maxwells conclusory assertion that none of the communications between Churcher and Plaintiffs attorneys/agents or law enforcement are in a newsgathering capacity Response at is contradicted by Churchers statements to the contrary and by the fact that individuals in those categories are quoted in the articles themselves both by Case Document Filed Page of name and anonymously as sources See Churcher Deel and Exs Maxwell Has Not Overcome the Protections of the Shield Law Maxwell argues that the information sought from Churcher is highly material in proving that each time Plaintiffs story is told new salacious detail are added Resp at see also id at arguing that the information is critical to establishing that fact But Churchers newsgathering materials and testimony are not needed to prove an assertion about the allegedly changing nature of a public story Similarly to the extent that the Joinder Motion is inconsistent with published articles by Churcher that would be apparent from the face of the Articles themselves and would not justify invading the Shield Law-protected newsgathering process Maxwell has contended that Churchers testimony is critical or necessary to her truth defense because it is relevant to Plaintiffs credibility which is the central issue in the case Id at However in almost any civil lawsuit the credibility of a party or witness will be a central issue"-all the more so in a defamation case where truth or falsity of the underlying statements is at issue zthis Case Document Filed Page of makes Churchers materials no more critical than any other evidence in this case Maxwell has not cited any authority for a wholesale libel exception or a plaintiffs credibility exception to the Shield Law Cf In re Am Broad Companies Inc Misc 2d N.Y.S.2d Sup Ct The privilege may yield only when the party seeking the material can define the specific issue other than general credibility as to which the sought-after interview provides truly necessary proof citing U.S Burke F.2d 2d Cir Finally even if the information sought were as critical as Maxwell contends she has not yet established that she has turned to Churcher only as a last resort In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Served on Nat Broad Co Inc Misc 2d at Section established the qualified privilege in both civil and criminal cases by requiring disclosure of nonconfidential material only as a last resort Maxwell seeks to reopen Plaintiffs deposition a motion which has been granted and is still awaiting further production from Plaintiff See 0kt Nos Minute Entry June Epsteins motion to quash has been denied 0kt No and Cassells motion to quash has been denied in part And all that Maxwell has done to exhaust law enforcement sources Case Document Filed Page of apparently is to file a single FOIA request Resp at There thus remain numerous alternative sources for the information Maxwell seeks She may not conscript Churcher as her investigative arm in the meantime Gonzales F.3d at Case Document Filed Page of VI Conclusion Upon the conclusions set forth above the motion of Churcher is granted and the Subpoena is quashed The parties are directed to jointly file a proposed redacted version of this Opinion consistent with the Protective Order or notify the Court that none are necessary within two weeks of the date of receipt of this Opinion It is so ordered New York NY September
34,009 characters
