394

PDF Document Uploaded Feb 2, 2026 by Unknown Updated by admin 1 views 187.85 KB
Court Records as described by folder names.
Epstein Release Interview Victim Statements Evidence Maxwell
← Back to Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2009)
Extracted Text

Edwards adv Epstein Case No ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Pag of6 Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS admits that RRA was engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases but Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the balance of the allegations of paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict pr of thereof Admitted Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS admits that Fisten and Jenne provided investigative services relating to the prosecution of the Epstein Actions Defendant EDWARDS denied the balance of the allegations of paragraph and demands strict proof thereof Defe.ndant EDWARDS admits that Fisten and Jenne reported to Edwards regarding matters related to the Epstein Actions Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge as to the balance of the allegations of paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Achriitted Defendant EDWARDS admits that Edwards incurred costs in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions Defendant EDWARDS is wit out knowledge as to the balance of the allegations of paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Edwards adv Epstein Case No ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Pag of6 Defe_ndant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS has accurately testified regarding the prosecution of the Epstein Actions and all conflicting allegations are denied and defendant demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS has accurately testified regarding the prosecution of the Epstein Actions and all conflicting allegations are denied and defendant demands strict proof thereof Admitted Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either adinit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Admitted Defendant EDWARDS admits the allegations ontained in subparts and of paragraph Defendant EDWARDS denies the balance of the allegations contained in pa agraph and demands strict proof thereof Edwards adv Epstein Case No ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Page4 of6 Defendant EDWARDS denies the allegations contained in paragraph and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof Admitted Defendant EDWARDS admits that Rothstein was arrested arraigned in federal court pied guilty and ultimately was sentenced to a year prison sentence for fraud and rac eteering Defendant EDWARDS is without knowledge as to the balance of the allegations contained in paragraph so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof COUNT I ABUSE OF PROCESS-EDWARDS Defendant EDWARDS admits or denies each of the allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth here Defe_ndant EDWARDS denies the allegations contained in paragraph and demands strict proof thereof Admitted Defendant EDWARDS denies the allegations conta ned in paragraph and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS denies the allegations contained in paragraph and demands strict proof thereof Defendant EDWARDS denies the allegations contained in paragraph and demands strict proof thereof Edwards adv Epstein Case No ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Page of6 COUNT II CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABUSE OF PROCESS-ROTHSTEIN The allegations of paragraphs are not directed to Defendant EDWARDS and are therefore not responded to AFFIRMATIVE DEFNSES The actions of EDWARDS are absolutely protected from liability in accordance with the litigation privilege The actions of EDWARDS are qualifiedly protected in accordance with the litigation privilege The claims against EDWARDS are barred by the sword-shield doctrine I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Fax and U.S Mail to all counsel on the a __ th day of October aro No Se enney Scarola Barnhart Shipley P.A Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach Florida Phone Fax Attorneys for BRADLEYJ EDWARDS Edwards adv Epstein Case No ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Page of6 Jack A Goldberger Esquire Atterbury Goldberger Weiss P.A Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein COUNSEL LIST Australian Avenue South Suite st Palm Beach FL Phone Fax Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman,PL Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein Andrews Avenue Suite Fort Lauderdale FL Phone Fax Marc Nurik Esquire Law Offices of Marc Nurik Attorney For Scott Rothstein One Broward Blvd Suite Fo.rt Lauderdale FL Phone Fax Jos:eph Ackerman Jt Esquire Fowler White Burnett P.A Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein Phillips Point West Flagler Drive West Palm Beach FL Phone Fa m/y t0 I F/Z V/j 1a qC KS u?v vZ O5 a qr rCX qC 0V I I dc rM?M rM 10Cy n??m?n k?o?h I A I w?!ac qr MCX 10Cy ITy qr M3 Ґ??1rA5R h?H?T3P K?z X?K I v"x i X5 EO5 5a r?q CX 9r Cy rq rqC M3 ş?:c p/p0 5H V)V 6T Y2 G5 qrM?r?qr?r9 q?10Cy rCX qr l1 X?l 3K fm?Q Z2f CX CX gT L??T 2E Cy 3P EM3 J4T L?h??M q?ᡚ?Y r??O?rJt CTX i P!e i I CTX rC YY I 1e 2j CTX X0T1i k3v Jh/e0h1 H(K W/Q0 CTX j?!k 5B r2 CTX A A A 4v z"p A A A0A?A AK CTX A A?!k CX qCX YCX i!d A fi8 l8 yuZ 6L pH m?c sP;0 6ZR Ni P0 0Q X(P0s s(s p0 Pp CTX qq dR B/J Va A d6 I I i i CTX I CTX U3 U3 U3 U3 S6 E"L I I I5K7C:I 9O U3 Cn qrr qr q??r?q 9qr CTX G5 qr CX rC l0 WS zN pf1 ODV8L?m jC1DxV CTX CTX A qr 10Cy rYY Ң??P?V CTX C"C rqM?rq?q?qr qr CTX YY Jb?C.y CTX CTX GG4 A A G5 C.C M??r 10Cy rq YY C?J?yO c/XE?lgF GM??H p?ݡG Dp9Oh CTX CTX CJ4 I J6 CJ4 CK qrrM?q qq 9/CX?o CX qYqr rC dd?Z c6S ttcx A CTX CTX 10Cy rq rqYY X?qiX:4 3J Db ZH uD-8 1g?BH I vS 7Oo7u E?K?O J6 UJP U0 UT??ʴ UT UT UT O(p U(u UF1 iZ qr?r CX CX Yr zKW:E A K5M P-M UW VW L1J KJ56 N/Q SQ rC 6J ߵl ߵl 5TZ w8ĥDG oj?K _4 N)?Y Hp pRqc?W26 vz?WBrz?ZB??3X H4 CTX A CTX X4 U5 P8 5D qr qr 10Cy qr YY Mo?ANp D01jJ 9F bzEV 4O 8V CTX O!o CTX KK AA qr A C5 qr rYY 1A?CC V9 a CTX 9F I CTX 6D N?qr rrqq qC O?J RmA??b"0 M?.F q?D B?G CTX CTX F4 d6P A F4 qr rYY 4G AV8 CTX UY UL0 U0 U0 U0 UF UF UFAGA UA UA UAL UL UL UL UL UL UL U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 2EH GTU U/U OUoU UV G1 CTX TUV 1G 7A UA UAL X7 U7 U7 U77XL UL UL ULLYX KTX 8Y GJ A UMAT UD 7M GVW GF10 MWA LL MPM M?M 4M XY qr qr qr NEeD 10Cy qYY E2 GH l1 Pd h3V g?KIq V5kL O65S d_xKKU vV 5H p1 Z6 CTX U0 U1 CTX U0 U1 A0 1D qr qr 10Cy YY K??Kl 1B AMwv 1K F1 KV yW Gd T?H CTX CTX I CK M?qr K?SK?PQZ I IRZX 8YCX 10Cy qr CX kv zg S5kB??a iG wA CTX U2 6Y CTX U2 6Y I K,,j j,s 6Y P!p qr 10Cy qr YY G?O 9K mSd X0 9r?yal 1d bY0 XNf??qN D?J CTX P!Z b!o C,C qrM 10Cy qr8 I fX2 9R lO KV CTX Oo CTX A qr r?qr rq YY Lsy7H4 C,6E IL CTX U3 CTX J,O3_3xx qrM?r q?CX Y9/C 9CX CTX Y10Cy CX CX CX YC YY FV uTl bEWa ȓjJ-8 Gc G??Q9E 9Wq CTX CTX Up i I A 9_ qr qr YY D.X 7s F??Y bc3_c iH CTX CTX A qr 10Cy YY EMq 7H AY mK9Z BY A2 P6L N7 CTX CTX a I I i qr rC CTX CTX 7O I FMM qr qr i I I3 CTX Z6 I L(K4 P:u Z6P CTX y8
7,656 characters