Media at Paedemic Media at Paedemic
Search Login
Home / Epstein Files / Court Records / Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1;22-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)
‹ Previous 447 of 1838 Next ›

285 07

PDF Document Uploaded Feb 2, 2026 by Unknown Updated by admin 1 views 178.65 KB
Folders as described
epstein court records
Download PDF

← Back to Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1;22-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)

Extracted Text

Case Document Filed Page of EXHIBIT Case Document Filed Page of AppendixT Due Diligence Report Guidelines I Purpose A Due Diligence Report DOR is an integral part of Enhanced Due Diligence EDD and a requirement of the Global KYC Standards for certain higher risk customers1 as defined below II Definition A DOR must be obtained from Due Diligence Operations ODO for a specified target The target is defined as the individual or entity who serves as the searching point for the DOR When the target is the customer or the related party the customer and all related parties must be submitted in the DOR request A DOR is not required for a public company traded on a recognized exchange and/or regulated by a recognized regulator or subsidiaries thereof2 However a DOR is required for the related parties of the public company traded on a recognized exchange or regulated by a recognized regulator A DOR is required to be submitted at the time of on boarding in accordance with the KYC Timing requirements of Section of the KYC Standards during the scheduled periodic review or a triggered event The Report will be requested by the LOB KYC Operations/Customer KYC in the following circumstances Customer from a very high risk jurisdiction PEP position of customer beneficial owner per the KYC Standards customer controller and/or account controller is in a very high-risk jurisdiction Customer with significant business industry assets source of wealth and/or income from a very high risk jurisdiction Customer is not publicly traded on a recognized exchange or not regulated by a recognized regulator and is associated with significant negative media Customer beneficial owner customer controller and/or account controller is associated with significant negative media Customer is an investment company with complex ownership Customer is a bearer share company that is not traded on a publicly recognized exchange Customer is a high risk NGO/Charity excluding well-recognized and reputable regional national and international NGOs Customer is at a higher risk for exposure to sanctions concerns as determined by the responses to the Sanctions questionnaire Consumer and Community Banking including all sub-LOBs excluding Dealer Commercial Services are exempt from requiring a Due Diligence Report or comparable research See Appendix of the Global KYC Standards Refer to AML Country Risk Rating list on GFCCs AML Intranet site Confidential JPM-SDNYLIT-00131915 Case Document Filed Page of Ill DDR Components The DDR is not intended to replicate or satisfy name screening or CIP verification requirements Instead the report is intended to provide research and additional information on the customer and related parties from various sources not covered by Client List Screening The DDR includes but is not limited to Civil and Criminal Record findings where available in public online databases Expanded English and Local Language Negative Media research The DDR is valid for a six month period and includes the facts as it relates to the research performed including the identification of potential red flags and a concise summary of the findings For the categories listed above the materiality of a red flag is defined in accordance with Appendix of the KYC Standards The DDR may contain information that DDO cannot verify is related to the target In these instances DDO will include the inconclusive information in the Report and notify the requestor that the results whether in whole or partially are inconclusive It will be the responsibility of the requestor/LOB to determine any subsequent actions required Any deviations with regards to the minimum requirements of this Appendix must be submitted as an exception request to the KYC Committee IV Roles and Responsibilities Party Responsible For Due Diligence Operations Performs the required research in a globally consistent manner using a format that meets the criteria established above Conducts the required research using consistent sources of internal and/or external information as applicable Refers target to AM Investigations as warranted based on research performed Ensures that potential red flags are clearly articulated in the DDR Provides the DDR to the requestor in timely manner and with consistent quality Maintains current procedures over the creation of a DDR including governance for the sources used LOB KYC Refers only High Risk Customers as defined in Section II of this Appendix to DDO Operations/Customer KYC Ensures that all customer CIP data and related party CIP data where required is Owner provided in the agreed-upon format to ensure that the research can be performed Responds to any requests for additional information from DDO during the DDR review Reviews the information provided ensuring that any red flags identified are addressed in the KYC Profile Retains the DDR within the KYC Profile in accordance with record retention requirements Escalates concerns identified in the DDR for LOB approval and GFCC review as warranted Confidential JPM-SDNYLIT-00131916
5,047 characters

© 2026 Media at Paedemic. All rights reserved.

Contact: info@paedemic.com