UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT I I I A JAN OE CA TD SE CV MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant JANE DOE NO CASE NO TD 32-MARRA/JOHNSO Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant JAN OE CA TD SE CV MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JE FF RE EPS TEIN Defendant JAN OE CA TD SE CV MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant JANE DOE NO CASE NO TD CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant JAN OE CA TD SE CI MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant A CA TD SE CI MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant JAN OE CA TD SE CI MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN et al Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Def end ant DO II CA TD SE CI MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN et al Def end ant JAN OE CA TD SE CI MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant JAN OE CA TD SE CI MA RR A/J OH NS ON Pl ain ti ff JEF FR EY EPS TEIN Defendant A ME ND ED OR DE TH IS A US is before the our on Defendant espon se in Oppos it ion to Plaint if Motion or Protect iv Order Regarding Trea tm ent Records an Motion to Strike Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of A ondi ti onal oti ce of Intent to Rel Ex cl usi ely on Stat utor amag es in Case No For the ollowi ng reaso ns tha portio of the Motio hich see ks an rder striking C.M.A.?s Cond itiona Notice of Inte nt to Rely Ex clusiv ely on St a ry Damag is def er re to the nit ed St ates is tr ic our as the nder si ned i it hout author it to ra nt he eli ef soug ht he espon se in Oppos it ion fil ed as par of the Mo ti on hal be onsi der ed by the under si ned hen add re ss ing Pla in ti ff oti on for Prote ctiv Order By thi oti on efendant eeks tw di sti nct forms of rel ief eac of hic du to the nat ure of the elief sought requires a ruling and or consid eratio by tw dif eren judges the Distri ct Judge regarding otion to Strike C.M.A.?s Cond itiona Not ice of Inte nt to Rely Excl usively on Sta tuto ry Dama ge a nd th Magistrate Judge regarding ef end ant Res i i i a i i ff i fo i a i a me nt Rec or ds Thi fact as br oug ht the att enti on of efendant ounse ff ic pr ior to the iling of the insta nt otion and or purpo ses of judicial ef iciency and docke cont rol it as re uest ed th at i nst ead of fil ing one moti on eeki ng the dual eli ef sou ght her Def end ant instea ile tw sep arate mot ions Rat her than heed the Cou rt sug est ion how ev er Defendant couns el has filed one mot ion see king th du al relief described abo sta ting in a fo otn ote the Resp onse in Opp osition to the Motion or Prote ctiv Order and the Motion to Strike are ine tricably ov en tog ether in that each deal it cri ti cal di sc ov er i ss ues Thus the espon se and he Mo ti on to Str ik mu st be hand led si mult aneous ly by the Cou rt ef?s Res an tn mphasi added Obv iou sl hat the our must do i for the Cou rt and not a a rt ic la a rt id De is io a in is a a lwa ys a xc lu ive Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of province of a judge hile a pa rty role is limited to tha of reque sting relief his is a fa ct all parties ould ell reme mb er Ha ing eview ed th plea dings iled incide nt to this matter and bei ng othe rw is dul adv is ed i the pr emis es i i er eby OR DE RE A ND A DJU DG ED that th por ti on of efendant oti on eeki ng to Strike C.M.A.?s Cond it io al Notice of Inte nt to Rely Ex clusiv ely on St atu tory Dam ages is DEFERRED TO THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT as the unders ig ned is it hout a uthor it to ra nt the re li ef oug ht That por ti on of efendant Mo ti on co ta in in a Res ponse i Opp osi ti on to laint iff?s oti on for Pr otec ti Or der eg ar din Trea tment Re co rd shal be onsi der ed by the under si ned hen add re ss ing Pl ain ti ff oti on for Prote ctiv Order DONE A ND ORD ERED thi A ug ust in Cha mbers at est Pal Beac Fl or ida LIN TD NE A OH NS ON UN TD ITED STATES AGIS TRATE UD GE CC TD he Hon orab le Ken net A Marra All Counse of Record Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of
4,077 characters
