JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff VS SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually BRADLEY EDWARDS individually and L.M individually Defendants I IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA CASE NO RE-NOTICE OF SPECIAL A A 4A E0 A4 DE a qr?q rq qrCX HhL Kg lg d?a d6U a M3 flW y??S m/y t0 I F/Z V/j 1a qC KS u?v vZ O5 a qr rCX qC 0V I I dc rM?M rM 10Cy n??m?n k?o?h I A I w?!ac qr MCX 10Cy ITy qr M3 Ґ??1rA5R h?H?T3P K?z X?K H?o I Idc rM?M rM 10Cy f헊?f?Tz e?e:Aa I v"x i X5 EO5 5a r?q CX 9r Cy rq rqC M3 ş?:c p/p0 5H V)V 6T Y2 G5 qrM?r?qr?r9 q?10Cy rCX qr l1 X?l 3K fm?Q Z2f CX CX gT L??T 2E Cy 3P EM3 J4T L?h??M q?ᡚ?Y r??O?rJt CTX i P!e i I CTX rC YY I 1e 2j CTX X0T1i k3v Jh/e0h1 H(K W/Q0 CTX j?!k 5B r2 CTX A A A 4v z"p A A A0A?A AK CTX A A?!k CX qCX YCX i!d A fi8 l8 yuZ 6L pH m?c sP;0 6ZR Ni P0 0Q X(P0s s(s p0 Pp CTX qq dR B/J Va A y!k N?M??N rC f?Nla3 Yz N?q qr NEeD d6 I I i i CTX GH FT I CTX U3 U3 U3 U3 S6 E"L I I I5K7C:I 9O U3 Cn qrr qr q??r?q 9qr CTX G5 qr CX rC l0 WS zN pf1 ODV8L?m jC1DxV CTX CTX A qr 10Cy rYY Ң??P?V CTX C"C rqM?rq?q?qr qr CTX YY Jb?C.y CTX CTX GG4 A A G5 C.C M??r 10Cy rq YY C?J?yO c/XE?lgF GM??H p?ݡG Dp9Oh CTX CTX CJ4 I J6 CJ4 CK qrrM?q qq 9/CX?o CX qYqr rC dd?Z c6S ttcx A CTX CTX 10Cy rq rqYY X?qiX:4 3J Db ZH uD-8 1g?BH I vS 7Oo7u E?K?O J6 UJP U0 UT??ʴ UT UT UT O(p U(u UF1 iZ qr?r CX CX Yr zKW:E A K5M P-M UW VW L1J KJ56 N/Q SQ rC 6J ߵl ߵl 5TZ w8ĥDG oj?K _4 N)?Y Hp pRqc?W26 vz?WBrz?ZB??3X H4 CTX A CTX X4 U5 P8 5D qr qr 10Cy qr YY Mo?ANp D01jJ 9F bzEV 4O 8V CTX O!o CTX KK AA qr A C5 qr rYY 1A?CC V9 a c?F CTX A G5 qr EeD?M CTX 9?rY 10Cy rq qY ȠX1 a f??B CTX 9F I CTX 6D N?qr rrqq qC O?J RmA??b"0 M?.F q?D B?G CTX CTX F4 d6P A F4 qr rYY 4G AV8 CTX UY UL0 U0 U0 U0 UF UF UFAGA UA UA UAL UL UL UL UL UL UL U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 2EH GTU U/U OUoU UV G1 CTX TUV 1G 7A UA UAL X7 U7 U7 U77XL UL UL ULLYX KTX 8Y GJ A UMAT UD 7M GVW GF10 MWA LL MPM M?M 4M XY qr qr qr NEeD 10Cy qYY E2 GH l1 Pd h3V g?KIq V5kL O65S d_xKKU vV 5H p1 Z6 CTX U0 U1 CTX U0 U1 A0 1D qr qr 10Cy YY K??Kl 1B AMwv 1K F1 KV yW Gd T?H CTX CTX I CK M?qr K?SK?PQZ I IRZX 8YCX 10Cy qr CX kv zg S5kB??a iG wA CTX U2 6Y CTX U2 6Y I K,,j j,s 6Y P!p qr 10Cy qr YY G?O 9K mSd X0 9r?yal 1d bY0 XNf??qN D?J CTX P!Z b!o C,C qrM 10Cy qr8 I fX2 9R lO KV CTX Oo CTX A qr r?qr rq YY Lsy7H4 C,6E IL CTX U3 CTX J,O3_3xx qrM?r q?CX Y9/C 9CX CTX Y10Cy CX CX CX YC YY FV uTl bEWa ȓjJ-8 Gc G??Q9E 9Wq CTX CTX Up i I A 9_ qr qr YY D.X 7s F??Y bc3_c iH CTX CTX A qr 10Cy YY EMq 7H AY mK9Z BY A2 P6L N7 CTX CTX a I I i qr rC CTX CTX 7O I FMM qr qr i I I3 CTX Z6 I L(K4 P:u Z6P CTX y8 Case No The JA cannot cancel this hearing unless the issue rs resolved No add-ons are permitted without contacting the JA Any Memorandums submitted are limited to double-spaced pages Any materials submitted are due at least days prior to the hearing The moving party is required to bring to the hearing a blank proposed Order with copies and envelopes Moving counsel certifies that he or she contacted opposing counsel and attempted to resolve the discovery dispute without hearing In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding contact the Court Administrators office not later than seven days prior to the proceedings If hearing impaired contact TDD or via Florida Relay I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S Mail to all Counsel on the attached list this day of January Fl.orida ar No Sear Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach Florida Phone Fax Attorney for Defendant Edwards Case No COUNSEL LIST Jack A Goldberger Esquire jgoldberger agwpa.com smahoney agwpa.com Atterbury Goldberger Weiss P.A Australian Avenue South Suite West Palm Beach FL Phone Fax Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman PL Andrews A venue Suite Fort Lauderdale FL Phone Fax Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Joseph Ackerman Jr Esquire jla fowler-white.com Fowler White Burnett P.A Phillips Point West Flagler Drive West Palm Beach FL Phone Fax Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Marc Nurik marc nuriklaw.com Law Offices of Marc Nurik One Broward Blvd Suite Fort Lauderdale FL Phone Fax Attorneys for Scott Rothstein JEFFREY EPSTElli Plaintiff vs SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually BRADLEY EDWARDS individually and L.M individually Defendants I IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA CASE NO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendant Bradley Edwards by and through his undersigned counsel moves this Honorable Court to reconsider the attached Orders sustaining Plaintiffs objections to discovery requests also attached and in support thereof the Defendant would show that the recent opinion of the th istrict Court of Appeal in Alvarez Cooper Tire Rubber Company copy attached supports the Defendants position that the Orders of the Court improperly restrict Defendants efforts to obtain information that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been firrnished by U.S Mail to all Counsel on the attached list this a JJ Jac car a Flo arNo Se ey Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley P.A Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach Florida Phone Fax Attorney for Defendant Edwards Epstein Edwards Case No COUNSEL LIST Jack A Goldberger Esquire Atterbury Goldberger Weiss P.A Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein Australian Avenue South Suite West Palm Beach FL Phone Fax Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehnnan,PL Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein Andrews Avenue Suite Fort Lauderdale FL Phone Fax Marc Nurik Law Offices of Marc Nurik Attorney For Scott Rothstein One Broward Blvd Suite Fort Lauderdale FL Phone Fax Joseph Ackerman Jr Esquire Fowler White Burnett P.A Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein Phillips Point West Flagler Drive West Palm Beach FL Phone Fax IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FWRIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DMSION JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff vs SCOTT ROTHSTEIN etc et al Defendant CASE NO AG ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEINS OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED SEPTEMBER THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant JEFFREY EFSTEINs_ Objections to Request for Admissions and Interrogatory dated September The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premises Based upon the foregoing it is CONSIDERED ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter Defendants Objections are sustained as to Requests No I an.cl The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Objections to Requests and are overruled 4.sJ DONE AND-ORDERED this.J.._ da:y of Palm Beach County Florida DA CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copy furnished JACK SCAROLA ESQUIRE Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT ESQUIRE Flagler Dr Phillips Point West West Palm Beach FL JACK GOLDBERGER ESQUIRE Australian Ave Suite West Palm Beach FL MARC NURIK ESQUIRE One Broward Blvd Suite Ft Lauderdale FL GARY FARMER JR ESQUIRE Andrews Ave Suite Lauderdale FL IN J.HE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORID.A IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DMSION JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff vs SCOTT ROTHSTEIN etc et al Defendant CASE NO AG ORDER ON PLAINTIFF COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEINS OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS REQUEST-TO PRODUCE DATED SEPTEMBER THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEINs Objections to Request to Produce dated September The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premises Based upon the foregoing it is CONSIDERED ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the 267Plaintiff/Counter Defendants Objection to Requests No and are overruled In all other respects the Objections are sustained at present i;;r DONE AND ORDERED this day of Palm Beach County Florida DAVID CROW CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copy furnished JACK SCAROLA ESQUIRE Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT ESQUIRE Flagler Dr Phillips Point West West Palm Beach FL JACK GOLDBERG ER ESQUIRE Australian Ave Suite West Palm Beach FL MARC NURIK ESQUIRE One Broward Blvd Suite Ft Lauderdale FL GARY FARMER JR.,_ESQUIRE Andrews Ave Suite Ft Lauderdale FL IN THE CIRCUIT COURiOF THE FIFfEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DMSION JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plain tiff vs SCOTT ROTHSTEIN etc et al Defendant CASE NO AG ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEINS OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS INTERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBER THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant JEFFREY 1;!:PSTEINs Objections to Defendant BRADLEY EDWARDS Interrogatories dated September The Cf?urt heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised in the premises Based upon the foregoing it is CONSIDERED ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff/Counter Defendants Objections are sustained as to Nos and As to question no the objection is sustained on the att;omey/client privilege The Court defers in regard to Interrogatory No pending the filing of an Amended Complaint by the Plaintiff The Objections are overruled as to questions No and ts DONE AND ORDERED this __ day ofDecem Palm Beach County Florida Copy furnished DAVID CROW CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE JACK SCAROLA ESQUIRE Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT ESQUIRE Flagler Dr Phillips Point West West Palm Beach FL JACK GOLDBERGER ESQUIRE Australian Ave Suite West Palm Beach FL MARC NURIK ESQUIRE One Broward Blvd Suite Ft Lauderdale FL GARY FARMER JR ESQUIRE Andrews Ave Suite Ft Lauderdale FL JEFFREY EPSTEIN Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant SCOTT ROTIISTEIN Individually BRADLEY EDWARDS 265idividually and L.M Individually Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs IN TIIB CIRCUIT COURT OF Tiffi 5TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA Complex Litigation FlaRCiv.Pro Case No DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEINS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS REQUEST TO PRODUCE DATED SEPTEMBER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule Florida Rules of Civil Procedure files this his Response dated September of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards Request to Produce and states as follows All statements of the defendant Bradley Edwards pertaining to any of the issues in this lawsuit Response The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has not taken a statement of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards with regard to the allegations of this complaint The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to the scope of this Request because it may encompass all of the transcripts from the various proceedings and the various other cases in Epstein Rothstein et al Case No CA Epsteins Response to Edwards RTP 267which Mr Edwards spoke as counsel As such the Request is overbroad burdensome and seeks irrelevant information All statements of any witness you intend to use at trial for impeachment Response Any statements that the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant have taken at this time are protected under the work product privilege The PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant will not know until depositions are taken what statements may be available for use at trial for impeachment All documents including but not limited to diaries journals computer database materials or any other written or electronically stored infonnation that reflect or relate to any communication to or from minor females and/or any physical contact which did or was planned to occur between you and any person who was a minor female at the time of the physical contact or planned physical contact including but not limited to any massage fondling or exual interaction of any kind this should include all message pads or appointment scheduler for minor females Response Objections irrelevant burdensome propounded for the purpose of harassment and protected by the Fifth Amendment All written documents supporting the allegations in your complaint Response Since discovery is still continuing in this matter the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant cannot produce all written documents supporting the allegations in the complaint The Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has requested relevant documents from the bankruptcy trustee to which the Defendant Edwards bas categorically lodged objections and the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant expects some of those records to support the allegations in the complaint Epstein Rothstein et al Case No CA Epsteins Response to Edwards RTP All message pads calendars of your schedule or appointments or other docu 265ients containing your massage appointments and Response Objections irrelevant burdensome propounded for the purpose of harassment and protected by Fifth Amendment A complete copy of each and every exliibit which you intend to introduce or have considered introducing into evidence at trial Response Since discovery is continuing the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant does not lmow at this time the _exhibits he intends to introduce or consider introducing at trial CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a truy-and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly via Email Facsimile lit"U.S Mail Hand Delivery Federal Express this ay of October to Jack Scarola Esq Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley P.A Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL Jack Alan Goldberger Esq Atterbury Goldberger Weiss P.A Australian A venue South Suite West Palm Beach FL Marc Nurik Esq Law Offices of Marc Nurik One Broward Blv:d Suite Ft Lauderdale FL Epstein Rothstein et al Case No CA Epsteins Response to Edwards RTP ByNi An au Jos hL.Ackerman Jr Fla Bar No FOWLER WIIlTE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIIE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEiN Complex Litigation FlaR.Civ.Pro Case No PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Individually BRADLEY EDWARDS Individually and L.M Individually Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs __ PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEINS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS REQUEST FOR ADMJSSIONS AND INTERROGATORY DATED_ SEPTEMBER Plaintiff Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein by and through his undersigned counsel and files this his Response to Request for Admissions and Answer to Interrogatory of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards pursuant to Florida Rule of C_ivil Procedure and states as follows EPSTEINS RESPONSE TO EDWARDS RFA Epstein objects to the Request for Admissions because the total including subparts exceeds thirty requests Florida Rules of Civil Procedure a There are in exce of sixty Requests for Admissions including subparts In addition to the objections above with regards to Paragraphs I the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects to these requests on the grounds that they are Epstein Rothstein et Case No CA Epsteins Response to Edws RFA Interrogatory irrelevant burdensome propounded for the purpose of harassment and re information which would be protected by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S Constitution In addition to th:e objection in Paragraph with regard to Request for Admissions in Paragraphs and the PlaintiffiCo1.U1ter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the requests _are irrelevant and propounded for the purpose of harassment In addition to the objection in Paragraph with regarq to Paragraphs the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds are irrelevant propounded for the purpose of harassment and the response would require the PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant to disclose attorney-client work product ccimrnwiications In addition to the objection in Paragraph with regard to the Request for Admissions in Paragraph and the PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the requests are irrelevant overbroad and propounded for the purpose of harassment CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly J.shed via Email Facsimile XJ.S Mail Hand Delivery Federal Express this b-t-t-aay of October to Jack Scarola Esq Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley P.A Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL Jack Alan Goldberger Esq Atterbury Goldberger Weiss P.A Australian A venue South Suite West Palm Beach FL Marc Nurik Esq Law Offices of Marc Nurik Epstein Rothstein et al Case No CA Epsteins Response to Edws RFA Interrogatory One Broward Blvd Suite Ft Lauderdale FL By kl.L Jos hL.ckennan Jr Fla Bar No FOWLER WHITE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIIE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA JEFFREY E1?STEIN Complex Litigation Fla.R.Civ.Pro Case No Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant SCOTT_ ROTHSTEIN Individually BRADLEY EDWARDS Individually and L.M Individually Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs __ PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEINS OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS GENERAL INTERROGATORIES DATED SEPTEMBER PlaintiffYCounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein by and through his undersigned cowisel and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure files his objections to the General Interrogatories of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards and would state as follows With regard to Interrogatories and the Plaintiff/Counter Defendant objects because the interrogatories see irrelevant infoi;ination are burdensome are propo1.D1ded for the purpose of harassment and ask for information which is protected by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution With regard to Interrogatories I I and the interrogatories seek infonnation that is irrelevant burdensome to produce and unlikely to lead to discoverable infonnation Epstein Rothstein et al Case No CA Epsteins Ans to Edwards General Interrogatories With regard to Interrogatory No the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant objects on the grounds that the information is protected by work product and attorney-client privilege at this time CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a t:rUy and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via Email Facsimile U.S Mail Hand Delivery Federal Express this day of October to Jack Scarola Esq Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley P.A Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach FL Jack Alan Goldberger Esq Atterbury Goldberger Weiss P.A Australian A venue South Suite West Palm Beach FL Marc Nurik Esq Law Offices of Marc Nurik One Broward Blvd Suite Ft Lauderdale FL Byf JZ eph Ac ennan Jr a Bar No FOWLER WlilTE
