UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA GIUFFRE Plaintiff against GHISLAINE MAXWELL Defendant Civ LAP ORDER Case Document Filed Page of Case Document Filed Page Pseudonym DOE DOE004 Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi mat ri a hould be un se aled in full First he burd of de tr at in th at a documen ubmitt ed to a co i ul be sea led es the pa rty see kin actio DiRus a Dean i ter Reyn olds In 2d ir No ne ha raised any objectio un sea lin a nd hu pai ul a and specific de rntio of fact ow in at dis cl os ur wo ul re ul in a injm as bee ade at i ufficien ov ercome he pre umpti of access Lytl JPMorgan ase upp 2d D.N Seco thi indi vidual gave a edia int erv i ew a hi or wo rk fo pstei to Dail Ma il in weig hin aga in co ntinued seal in Unit ed States Ave at ti No SI PGG WL at D.N.Y Jan In co id er in heth er seal in i appropriate an impo1ian co ide ratio is co ur se ther the infonn atio so ught to be ep co nfiden ial is afready public eai in Tr at un sea lin documen relating to oe gave me dia inter views an was iden ified the pres se http w.dai lym a il co.uk ews a1iicle-1365733/How-Prince Andrew a red-ro m-Ep teins-Cai ibb ea n-hi deaway bu sty bl de c1 a imed bra in ur geo html Thi a teri a hould be un sea led in full Fir no inter ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco thi indi vid a gave a medi a in erview about hi her wo rk for Ep tein to the Daily Mail in weigh in aga in co ntinued seal in Avenatti WL a Heai Tr at se tps da il aiLco.uk ne ws hai 267ed-ro m-Ep ein Cai 267ibbe an-hid eaway bu sty bl de cl ai med-b ra in ur geo n.html Case Document Filed Page Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First hi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second this in div idu al tes ified publicly at Maxwells cr imin al ti ial we i hin aga in st cont inued sea lin Avenat ti WL at ea rin Tr at un sealing doc um nt relatin to oe ose a me ca me up publicl at Maxwe ll cri min al u-ial Although hi indi vi du al te stified under hi or her firs nam nl he or he publicly wa i ved any right to anonymity after the cr imin al ti as Jud ge Nat a fo un a nd gave an int view in hi fir st and las nam es See United States Maxwell Dk nos htt ps daily ail.co uk/news ai i icle-103 3/Key itne ss Ghi lain Maxwe ll ti ial waives an mi ty make se satio a l-n ew cl a im.html This mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First this in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second po1iions of thi indi idual depositio we re rel ease by th Seco nd Circ uit ean in hi her naine an associatio wi th this case is a lr eady public Ave atti WL at Heai1 Tr at mlin that a ri a rele ased by th Seco Ci uit uld be un sealed Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First this indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second po1iions of thi indi idual depositio we re rel ease by th Seco nd Circ uit ean in hi her naine an associatio wi th this case is a lr eady public Ave atti WL at Heai1 Tr at mlin that a teri a rele ased by th Seco Ci cuit uld be un sealed Thi in dividuals a me and a ti hip to Epstein we re also pu licl discussed at Maxwe ll cr imin al ti ial Case Document Filed Page Pseudonym DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi a teri a ou ld be un sea led in full Fir inter ests that tweigh the presumption access ave been id ntifi ed ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second thi indi vidual gave a edia interview about hi int ra ctio wi th pstei to Va ni ty Fair in weig hin aga in co ntinu ed se aling Ave natti WL at ear in Tr at un ealing document relating to oe gave me dia inter views an was identified the pre ss see http va ni tyfai com ne confe ss ion of-a lint wo rld-e xile Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md identifying intere th at utwei the presumption of access wi th pecificity DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Seco nd doc um nt relating to thi in div idual includin emails hi the in dividual i co pi ed and a ub tanti ve de cl ara ti by the indi vid a we eleased by th Seco nd Circ uit meanin hi her name an associatio wi th thi case i a lr eady public Ave atti WL at He a rin Tr at lin that a teri a rele ased by th Seco Ci cuit uld be un sealed Case Document Filed Page Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE0 DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full Firs hi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er bmden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second sea led aterial as to hi individual i ot alacious Thi a teri a ou ld be un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh presumption access ave been iden ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second thi individual associatio wi th Epstein ha bee rep ed in the media a ea and hi her name came up at Maxwe ll public riminal ri al Ave atti WL at ea rin Tr at Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First hi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second thi individual associatio wi th Epstein ha bee rep ed in the media a ea and hi her name came up at Maxwe ll public riminal ri al Ave atti WL at ear in Tr at Thi a teri a hould be un sea led in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh presumption access ave been id ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd sea led aterial as to hi indi idual i ot alacious Case Document Filed Page Pseudonym OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie Ruling oe a a ll re a in redacted in doc um at doc et numb er Th un sea lin of oe ame in hi docume nt wo ld disclose se sit i ve in fo natio rega in a a ll eged min or vict im sex a ab se as ot spoke li cly a as a in ta in ed hi pr i vacy As ch li inte es does not tweigh ivacy in terests of a ll eged min i tim Ot e1wise hi ate ial ld be un sealed in foll Fi rst is in divid a did raise any objectio un sea lin an hu di eet hi or er ur de ide tifying in teres at twe i es um ptio of access wit spec i fic i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle pp 2d at Second sealed ate ia as to hi i nd i vid a is ot salacio an co sists pr im ar i ly of Ru le dis cl os ur es In addi ti is ind i i a gave a pr ess in terv i ew in oe 6s ame an an ide tify in in fo nn atio a ll re a in sealed Doe i a a ll eged min or vict im of sex a ab se as ot spoke pu blicly a as a in ta in ed is or pr ivacy As th pu blic int est does outweig th pr ivacy int es of th alleged min victi Case Document Filed Page Pseudonym OE OE OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie Ruling Thi a ia ou be un seale in fu ll irs int ests at tweigh es um ptio access ave bee i de ti fi ed i eci fi city iR ssa 3d at ytle upp 2d at Seco is indi vid a a appea nl in a a lr eady pub licl availa le olice epo1i an ind i i a appears to be a mb er of aw force speci fi ca ll an assistant state atto rn ey in a ll ly doc um at ub sta nti vely i sc sses is in div i al is a 1r eady licl ava i lab th doc et i thi in divid al a unr ac ed See dkt Th i a ial ld be un sealed in full Firs hi in div idu al i ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er ur de of ide tify in in teres hat twe i es um ptio of access wi th spec i fic i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle pp 2d at Seco th is in dividuals ro in hi case as bee re ied in th edia a 1r eady Ave at ti WL a ear in Tr at Thi a ial ld be un sealed in full Firs hi in div idu al i ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er ur de ide tify in in teres th at twe i es um ptio of access wi th spec i fic i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle pp 2d at Second as to oc nn thi i a pu blicly available ews aicle Thi ater i a ld un sealed in full hi in divi du al did ot ra ise any objec ti to un sealing and hu i ot ee hi er ur de of identify in i nterests a tweig th es um ptio access i speci fi city iRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at hi i nd i vid a is a pub li fi ur and nl in inu at i is th at hi a was co nt a in alo wi th a th ers in a pste in a ddr ess book ere is salac i a ll egat i about i co tained in sole doc um ent Case Document Filed Page eudon OE OE ev ant Do ntri es Rulin Th i materia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second is individuals assoc i at i on with Eps i has been epo1ted i media a eady Ave atti WL at earing Tr at Th i individual is a pub li figure and none of the mater i a that elate to im a salacious Th i ma eria ould be unsea ed in fu ll This indiv i duals role in Eps in sex trafficking has been widely repo ed in media the Second Circu i unsealed allegat i ons about is i ndividual i th i case and he or she was subject to wide pub li i zed cr i minal prosecut i on abroad fo sex trafficking Avenatti WL at earing at Case Document Filed Page eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full Th sealed mater i al as to is individua is no salacious In deed ese documen ts have ah-eady been made public by Professo ers owitz and th i Court Th i mate ial ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indiv i dual i no raise any object i on to sea ing and thus did no meet i or er burden of iden ify i ng i erests tha outwe i OE presumptio of access wit spec i fic i ty Di Russa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ly document at substantively discusses this ind i vidua is ah-eady pub li cly available the docket i th i i ndividual name unredacted See dkt Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ly document at substantively discusses this ind i vidua is ah-eady pub li cly available the docket i th i i ndividual name nr edacted See dkt Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at OE Second the sealed mate ia as to this i nd i vidua is not salacious and co sists pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures Thi is indiv i duals association with Epstein as been repo i ed i the media a eady Avenatt i WL at Hearing Tr at Th i mate ia shou sealed i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ly reference i a deposit i on a swe that th i ind i vidua was a staff member poss i bly esent at a i me and ace Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i mater ia ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indi i dual i no raise any jec i to OE sea ing and thus did no meet i or er burden of iden ify i ng i erests tha outwe i presumptio of access wit spec i fic i ty Di Ru ss a 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sea led ma erial as to is ind i i dua i no alacious Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed material a to this ind i vidua is no sa laciou only efere ce to is ind i i dua are i pas i ng a in a ben i gn co text Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at OE Second is individual assoc i at i on wit Ep i as been i dely epo1ted in media ah-eady and the Seco Circu i un ea ed is indiv i duals ame a info1ma ion about hi or her at i onsh i i Epstein Ave atti WL at ea ing Tr at Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ealed mate ia as to thi i nd i vidua i not salacious and co i pr i mar i ly of Rule disclo ure Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling This a teri a sho uld be un sea led in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh presumption access ave been iden ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd sea led aterial as to hi individual i ot alacious Thi a teri a ou ld un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh presumption access ave been id ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second the sealed ate ri al as to thi indi vidual i ot alacious and ostly ate to deposition sc hedulin Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First hi indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second thi indi vid a as soc ia ion i Epstein and Maxwell as been id rep rt ed in medi a ah-eady an hi or er nam ca me up at Maxwell publi rimin al trial Ave a tti WL at He ar in Tr at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second the ealed ate ri als all rel ate to the ame two fact about thi in dividuals a ssoc iation ith Maxwell hi i alacious and ha be en id ely rep i ed in the edia a he ady Ave atti WL at He ar in Tr at Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second the sea led aterial abo thi indi vid al i sa la i Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE040 DOE DOE04 Relevant Docket Entries Ruling This material shou ld unsealed in full First no inter ests at outweigh the presumption of access ave been iden ified ith specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second his individual is a journalis investigated Epstein and thus hi or her materials ould a ll be unsealed This material shou ld be unsealed in full First no inter ests that outweigh the presumption of access ave been iden ified ith specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this individuals association with Eps ein ha been eported in the media a eady and in fact certain of the sea ed docume nt at issue are news a1ticles Avenatti WL at Hearin Tr at This material shou ld be unsealed in full First no int ests that outweigh the presumption of access ave been id entified ith specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed material as to this indi vidua is not salacious and co sists primarily of Rule disclosures and lists of searc e1ms This material ould be unsealed in full First this individual did no raise any object i on to unsealing and thus did no meet his or er burden of iden ifying in erests tha outwe i presumption of access wit spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed material as to this indi vidua is not salacious and co sists primarily of Rule disclosures Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE044 DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling oe nam and an identifying in fo nn atio hall remain sealed Doe i a alleged min or vict im sex ual ab se as ot spo ken publicly about the ub ect atte of thi litigation a nd as a in ta in ed hi her privacy As he publi intere oes outweig the pri vacy interests of th alleged min vict im Thi a teri a ou ld be un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh presumption access ave been id ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second hi indi vid a a lle gatio aga in Ep ein and ot her have been previously reported by th pr ess and thi indi vid a ha give multiple int views to th edia A ve atti WL at ear in Tr at http nb cnews com ews ews/how british te Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First hi indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er bmden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second hi indi vid a a lle gatio aga in Ep ein and ot her have been previously reported by th pr ess and thi indi vid a as give multiple inter views to the media A ve atti WL at He a rin Tr at see http w.glor ia alh-ed.co wp conte upl oa sites 019-08-27-Epstein-Teala-Davies pdf Thi a teri a sho uld be un sea led in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh presumption access ave been id ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd sea led aterial as to hi indi idual i ot alacious Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i materia shou be sea led i full First no in tere that outweigh the esumptio access ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second is i ndividual ame appears only i an ah-eady publicly avai able po li ce repo1t re eased by Second Circuit and ind i vidua appears to be a member of law enforcemen spec i fically a detective Finally the only document that substantive di sc sses hi indiv i dual is ah-eady publicly avai able on docket with is ind i i dua name unredacted See dkt Th i materia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at OE Second is ind i vidua allegations against Ep i and ot ers have been previously reported by the pre ss and is indiv i dua te tified pub li cly at a hear i ng before Judge Be1man afte Ep te i dea Avenatti WL at ear i ng Tr at Th i ma te i al ould be sea led in full hi ind i vidua ha advocated to th i Comt at all pas un ma er i als relating to im er ould be un ealed See dkt no OE Th i mater i al hou be sea led in full hi i nd i vidua i a med i cal prov i der whose ame ha a eady been revealed in nr edacted documents docket See e.g dkt no Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ealed mate ia as to thi i nd i vidua i not salacious and co i pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosmes and lists of se arc e1m Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling This a teri a sho uld be un sea led in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh presumption access ave been iden ti fi ed i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd sea led aterial as to hi individual i ot alacious oe 5Ts name and an id tify in info1mati a ll remain sealed oe i an alleged victi of sex ual abu se ha ot spoke publicly and ha main tained hi or her pri vacy As public interest does not tweigh privacy in te re of th alleged victi oe nam and any identifying info1ma i a ll a in sea ed oe i a cla ss i ts id er peripheral events at i ss oe i ei th a victi or associate i Epstein or Maxwell Any refer ce to Doe played a ppar ent role in Judge Sweets mlin ti hi thi doc um ent was at ac hed Thi ma te ri al uld be un sealed in full This indi vid al i eceased but hi name was un sea ed in materi a relea ed by the Seco Circ ui Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi a teri a ou ld be un seale in full Fir inter ests at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd th sealed ate ri a as to this indi vid a is ot salacio an co sists primarily of Rul dis cl os ure Thi ater ial uld be un seale in full The pa1ties were un able to loca an a ddre ss for thi individual an ther efo re ti ce was provided dkt oweve th sealed ater i al as this indi vi du al is ot salacio The ate rial ill redact he a of oe ose id nti ty the Seco nd ircuit kept sea ed Releasing oe name cou ld ai the pri vacy int re of th indi vid a th Co Appeals dee med sealab by allow in th pr ess an ther identi fy de nt iden ity Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First this indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second hi indi vid a a lle gatio aga in Ep ste in and ot her have been previously reported by the pr ess this indi vi du al as give multiple in erviews to he edia an thi indi idual tes ified publicly at Maxwells riminal trial under hi or her real nam Ave natti WL at Hearin Tr at http yt im eps tein-f ai i ste axwell html Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First hi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second hi indi vid a a lle gatio aga in Ep ein and ot her have been previously reported by th pr ess and thi indi vid a ha give multiple inter views to th edia A ve atti WL a Hearin Tr at tps yt im es com/20 epste in faim er-sisters axwell html Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er burden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Seco nd thi in dividuals assoc iati wi th Ep ein as ee id ely epo 1ted in the medi a ah-eady and th Seco Circui un ealed hi in div idual nam and info1m atio abo hi or her relati hip i Epstein Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full No intere at utwei th pr es ump ion of access ha ve been identified wi th ec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Thi a teri a hould be un sea led in full Fir no inter ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd po1tion thi indi idual deposition we re released by the Seco nd Circ uit meanin hi her naine an associatio wi th thi case i a lre ady public Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at During the rimin al trial ne of the nam ed i tims estified that Pl a intiff and thi indi vid a we then both ove th age of ec rnit ed him or at th age of Case Document Filed Page of eudon OE OE ev ant Do ntri es Rulin provide ma ssages to Epstein Th i oes firs and la ame we provided i open comt in connect i on i the a ll egatio See Tria Tr U.S Maxwell cr Th i mate ia hou sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second th i ind i vidua association with th i case as bee eported i the med i a a eady Ave atti WL at ea ing Tr at Th i mate ia hou sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second is individual assoc i at i on wit Ep i as been i dely epo1ted in media ah-eady Ave atti WL at ea ing Tr at Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es OE Th i mater ia ould unsealed in full No interes ts tha outwe i the presump ion of access ave been identified wit spec i fic i ty iRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed mate ia as to this i nd i vidua is not salacious and co sists pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed mate ia as to this i nd i vidua is not salacious and co sists pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures Th i mate ia ould unsealed in full No inte es ts tha outwe i the esumption of access ave OE been identified wit spec i fic i ty iRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Th i mate ia ould unsealed in fu ll No in te es ts at outwe i the esumption of access ave OE been i de i fied with specific i ty DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Th is ind i i dua name also appears i a pub li cly avai able police repo i Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i material ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indiv i dual i no raise any object i on to sea ing and thus did no meet i er burden of iden ify i ng i erests that outwe i OE presumptio of access wit spec i fic i ty Di Russa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second is individuals assoc i at i on wit Eps i as been i dely epo1ted in media ah-eady and the Seco Circu i unsea ed is indiv i duals ame a info1ma ion about his or her at i onsh i i Epstein Ave atti WL at ea ing Tr at Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at passun Second the Second i rcuit unsealed is indiv i dua name and info na io about his or her at i onsh i i Epstein Ave atti WL at ea ing Tr at OE Th i mate ial ould be unsealed in full No inte es ts tha outwe i the esumption of access ave been identified wit spec i fic i ty iRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed mate ia as to this i nd i vidua is not salacious and co sists pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym OE OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie Ruling Thi ater i a ld un sealed in fu ll Thi in divi du al did ot ra ise any objec ti to un sealing and hu i ot ee hi er ur de of ide tifying in terests at tweig th es um ptio access i ec i ficity iR ssa 3d at Lyt le upp 2d at Thi a ial ld be un sealed in full Firs hi in div idu al i ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er ur de of ide tify in in teres hat twe i es um ptio of access wi th spec i fic i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle pp 2d at Seco is indi vid a a an associatio wit Eps in and Maxwell as ee wi ely li cized by ed i a hi in div i al as bee a ed as a defe da nt in pub li awsu i ts relat in Eps in a th Seco Ci it un sea ed ub sta nti al a ia relat in thi i nd i vi du al Ave atti WL at ea rin Tr a Thi ate ial ld be un sealed in full No int ests th at twe i th pr es ump tio of access ave bee ide tified wi th ec i fic i ty i Ru ssa F.3d at Lytle pp 2d at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym OE OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie Ruling oe a and an id tify in in fo1 at i a ll a in sealed oe is a a ll eged victi of sex a ab se as ot spo licl and as a in ta in ed is pr ivacy As th pu blic int est does outweig th pr ivacy int ests of a ll eged vict im Thi a ia sho ul be un seale in fu ll Firs no int ests th at tweigh es um ptio access ave bee i de ti fi ed i eci fi city iR ssa F.3d at ytle upp 2d at Seco ly efere ce is a os i tio estio in a swer hi depo de ni ed kn owledge of th in dividual Thi ate ial ld be un sealed in full No int ests at twe i th pr es ump tio of access ave bee ide tified wi th ec i fic i ty i Ru ssa F.3d at Lytle pp 2d at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi ate ri al uld be un sealed in full Thi indi vid a passed away in But this indi idual association ith Epstein ha been wide rep o1ie in the media ah-eady alo wit pictures of thi individual Epsteins island Avenatti WL at ear in Tr at Thi a teri a sho uld be un seale in full First no int ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd he nl efere ce is a dep os i ion question in a swer hi the deponent de ni ed kn owledge of the in dividual Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First this in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thus did ot eet hi er burden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wit spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Seco nd the sealed ate ri a as to this indi vid a is ot salacio an co sists primarily of Rul disclosures and li sts of sea enns Fin a ll hi indi idu als nam and association i Ep ste in as been publicized by the edia Ave at ti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi ater ial ul un sealed in full Thi indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un sealing and thus did ot ee hi er burden of identifying int erests that tweig th presumption access i ec ifi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries None Identifi Ruling Thi ater ial uld un sealed in full Thi indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un sealing and hu did ot ee hi er burden of identifying int erests that tweig th presumption access i pe ifi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Any infonn atio a thi indi idual uld be un sea ed in full First this individual did raise any ob ectio to un sea lin and thus did ot meet hi er burden of identi fying int erests th at utwei he pr es umpti access wit spec ifi i ty DiRussa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd he seale ateria as to hi indi idu a i sa la cio a nd consis ts ostly privilege logs and documen ts discussing privilege logs Finall hi indi idual nam and associatio wit Ep ste in ha ee id publicized by the edia this indi vidua as been nam ed as a defendan in public lawsuits relatin to Epstein a nd he Seco nd ircuit un sea led hi individuals a me a nd in fo nn atio abo hi her relationship wi th Epstein Ave at ti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi a teri a ou ld be un seale in full Fir inter ests at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci ficity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second the seale aterial as to hi individual i ot salacio Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi ater ial ul un se aled in full Thi indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un sealing and thus di not eet hi or her ur de of id nti fy in int es at twe igh th access wi th ec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full Firs thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second th ealed ate ri a a to thi indi vidual i alaciou Fin a ll hi in div idua ls nam and as soc iation ith Ep tein has been wide publicized he media an thi in div idual ha bee nam ed a a de fe ndant in public law uit elat in pstei Ave at ti WL at He ar in Tr at un sea lin documents rel at in to oe ha been the ubje of inten se edia coverage Thi ate rial ul un ealed in full Thi indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un seal in and thu did ot ee hi er burden of identifying int erests that tweig th presumption access i ec ifi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Thi a teri a ou ld be un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie pass un Ruling Seco th nl refe ce is a deposi ti uestio to hi de de ied kn owledge of oe Thi a ial ld be un sealed in full Firs hi in div idu al i ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er de ide tify in in teres th at twe i es um ptio of access wi th spec i fic i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle pp 2d at Second th is indi id a a an associatio wit Eps in and Maxwell has ee wi ely li cized by ed i a hi in div i al as bee a ed as a defe da nt in pub li awsu i ts relat in Eps in a th Seco Circ it un sea ed ub sta nti al a ia relat in thi in i vi du al Ave atti WL at ea rin Tr a Thi a ia sho ul be un sea le in fu ll irs no int ests th at tweigh es um ptio access ave bee i de ti fi ed i eci fi city iR ssa 3d at Lyt le upp 2d at Seco th nl refe ce is a deposi ti uestio to hi de de ied kn owledge of oe Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi material ould be unsealed in full First this individual did no raise any object i on to un sea lin and thus did no meet hi er burden of iden ifying in erests that outwe i presumption of access wit pecifici ty DiRu ss a F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ealed material as to thi indi vidua i not salacious and co i primarily of Rule disclo ure and lists of se arch e1m Thi material ould be unsealed in full First thi individual did no raise any object i on to un sea lin and thus did not mee hi or her burden of iden ifying in te re ts tha outweigh of acces with specificity DiRu ssa at Lytle Supp 2d at Seco thi individuals nam and assoc iati on i Epstein as a h-e ady bee publicized by the media Thi material ould be unsealed in full First thi in div idu al did no raise any object i on to un sea lin and thus did no meet hi or er burden of iden ifying in erests tha outwe i presumption of access wit pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this individual assoc iati on wit Ep ein as been id ely epo rt ed in the media ah-eady and the Seco Circui un ealed hi in div idual nam and info1ma ion about hi or her relati onsh ip i Epstein Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Plaintiff ac kn owledged that thi person i deceased and therefore did not receive ot i ce Th Co urt is unable to locate Doe name in the li ted pleading Acco rdin gly any material elating to this Doe ould be unsealed in full Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling This ater ial uld un sealed in full Thi indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un sealing and thus did ot me hi er burden of identifying int erests that tweig the presumption access i ec ifi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Thi ater ial uld un sealed in full Thi indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un sealing and thus did ot me hi er burden of identifying int erests that tweig the presumption access i ec ifi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First this indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er burden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Seco thi individual a me and assoc iati wit Epstein as a eady een id ely publicized by the media Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First this indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er burden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Seco thi in div idual name a nd associa ti wit Epstein as bee wide pu li i zed by medi a Ave att i WL at ear in Tr at Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i materia shou be sealed i full First no in teres ts that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sole references appear to be in Rule i sclosmes and searc tenns Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sole references appear to be in Rule i sclos es and searc tenns Th i mate ia shou sealed i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the refe ences all are included in Rule i sclosmes search tenns and a earsay statement that the name appears in Epsteins address book Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sole reference is tha th i i ndividual name appears to be contained a fl ig og Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second sea ed mate ial as to th i indiv i dual is ot salacious the so refe ce to is i ndividual is a hea say stateme that the oe appeared i Epsteins address book Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First hi in div idu al did ot raise an je ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er burden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second sea led aterial as to hi individual i ot alacious Thi materi al ul be un ealed in foll Thi indi vidual i a fo1mer aw nfor ce men ffi cial and ec ifi ca ll a fonner Assistant U.S At rne and hi in div idual role in Epstein ca se is paii of a public Office of rofess i nal Re ponsibility epo rt Thi a teri a hould be un sea led in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh presumption access ave been iden ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco th ealed ate ri a as to hi indi vid a i ot salacio an co i primai il of Rul disclo ure Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First hi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecificity DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second th ealed ate ri a as to hi indi vid a i ot salacio an co i primai il of Rul dis cl os ure Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi a teri a sho uld be un seale in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been id ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd hi indi vid a a me an associatio wit Epstein and Maxwell as been wi del publicized by he edia an hi individual as ee a med as a defendant in publi la ws uit relatin to Epstein Ave atti WL at ea rin Tr at un sealing doc um nt rela in to oe as been the ec of in ense medi a coverage Thi a teri a ou ld be un seale in full Fir inter ests at tweigh the presumption access ave been id ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second thi indi vid a a me appears nl in an already publicly avai a ble olice rep o1i and individual appears to be a member of law enforcement speci fi ca ll a olice office Finally nl document th at substantively di sc sses hi individual is already publicly available docket wi th this individuals nam unred acted See dkt Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi a teri a ou ld un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second thi indi vid a a me an associatio wit Epstein and Maxwell ha ee wi del publicized by the edia an thi individual ha ee a med as a defendant in publi la ws uit relatin to Epstein Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi ma te ri al uld be un sea ed This indi vid a is a medic al provider ose nam as ah-eady been re vealed in doc umen docket unre dacted See dkt oe name and any id ifying info1mati hall remain sea ed Doe i a cla ss ic id er peripheral he eve at i ss ue oe i neith a vic tim assoc iated wi th Ep ein Maxwell Any reference oe played a pparen role in Jud ge Swee rnlin the ot i hi hi document was attac ed Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i material ould sealed in full laint i ff se a non-paiiy notice to th i indiv i dual a rece i ved de li ve1y confinnat i on i st is ind i vidua di ot raise any object i on to sea ing and OE thus did no mee his or ur de of i de i fy ing inte ests at outweig presumptio of access with specificity DiRussa at Lytle Supp 2d at Seco this indiv i duals aine and assoc i at i on i Epstein as bee publicized by med i a A ve atti Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second th i indiv i duals name and assoc i at i on with Epstein has bee pub li i zed by the media Ave atti WL at earing at Th i mate ia shou be sealed i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this individuals name appears in a pub li cly ava i lab police repo1t Th i ma er i a ould be unsealed in fu ll This i ndividual did no raise any object i on to unsealing OE and thus i no meet i er burde of identifying i nterests that outweig the esumptio of access i spec i ficity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Th i ma er i a ould be unsealed in fu ll This i ndividual did no raise any object i on to unsealing OE and thus i no meet i er burde of identifying i nterests that outweig the esumptio of access i spec i ficity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First hi indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu id ot eet hi er bmden iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second thi individual i a fo nner la enforcement ffi cial and ec ifi cally a fo1mer Assis tan U.S Atto rne and thi indi vid a role in the Epstein case i pait of a public Office of Profe ss i nal Respon ibility Repo1t Thi a teri a ou ld be un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh presumption access ave been id ified i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second po1tion of thi indi idual depositio we re rel ease by th Seco nd Circ uit ean in hi her naine an associatio wi th hi case i a lre ady public Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi materi al ul be un ealed in full A ll egatio abo thi indi vid ual ave been id ely rep o1te in media and Seco Ci ui un sealed allegatio about thi individual in thi case Ave na tti WL at Heai1 Tr at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi indi vi du als nam an identi fyi info1ma tio a ll remain seale in full Pl a intiff does ot dis pu that this oe was mi a nl id ntifie in a photograph and that thi oe hara teriz atio as an alleged perpetrator was first int rod ce a repo1 i er by Plaintiff fu additio thi oe as so to avoid publi attention the allega ti As ch the public interest does utwei he privacy intere sts of this oe Thi a teri a sho uld be un seale in full First no int ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been id ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second thi in dividuals nam and assoc iati wit Ep ste in and Maxwell ha been publi cized by the media Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at oe nam and any i de nti fy in infonn atio shall rem a in seale Doe i an a lle ged min vict im sex ual ab se who as ot spo ken publicly and who as maint a in ed hi her privacy As ch the public interest does not tweigh the privacy in erests of the a ll eged min i tim Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym OE OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie Ruling Thi in dividual i same ind i vid a as Doe is a ia ou be un seale i full First thi in div i al id ot raise a jectio un sea lin a thu did ot ee is ur de of ide tify in in tere sts hat tweigh th pr es ump tio of access wit specificity DiRu ssa F.3d at yt 2d at Second th is in divid al ame a assoc i at i wit Eps in and Maxwell as been widely li cized by edia a thi in dividual as been na ed as a defe dant in li laws i elating Eps in Ave atti WL a ear in at un sea lin doc um nt a tin to oe as bee ub ject in te se edia coverage Thi ate ri al ul be un seale in fu ll la inti ff ocated add ess fo hi erso nl efe ce is a os i tio qu es ti to hi a ty de ni ed knowledge of Thi ater i a ld un sealed in fu ll Thi in divi du al did ot ra ise any objec ti to un sealing and hu i ot ee hi er ur de of identifying i nterests a tweig th es um ptio access wi th speci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at ytle pp 2d at urth th is ind i i a a appea nl in a blic po li ce epo rt and was a eady released by thi Co i See dkt Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i material ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indiv i dual i no raise any object i on to OE sea ing and thus id no meet i or er mden of iden ify i ng i erests tha outwe i presumptio of access wit pec i fic i ty Di Ru ss a 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the Second ir cuit un se aled is ind i vidua name a re at i onsh i with Ep i Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the Second Ci cuit unsealed this indiv i dua name and re at i ons ip i th Ep tein Ave atti WL at earing at Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the pre umptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second Seco Ci cu i previou sea led this indi i dual ame A venatt i WL at ea ing Tr at Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full Fir no in te ests at outweigh the pre umptio of access OE ave bee i den ified i th pecificity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sea led material as to i ind i i dua i no alaciou Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries pas un Ruling Thi a teri a hould be un sea led in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh presumption access ave been iden ti fi ed i eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd hi indi vid a as soc iation i Epstein a nd Maxwell as been id re po 1te in edia ah-eady an hi or er nam ca me up at Maxwell publi rimin al trial Avena tti WL at ear in Tr at This indi vid al was also nam ed as a defendant in a publi federal law ui involving ame cond ct un derly in thi act i Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full Firs thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er bmden of identifying in teres th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecificity DiRu ss a F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at o1tio of hi indi vid al depo ition in a atte aga in st Epstein we re also un ealed Thi a teri a ou ld be un sea led in full Fir inter ests at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ti fi ed ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second the refer ces a sa la cio Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi material ould be unsealed in full First this in div idu al did not raise any object i on to un sea lin and thus did not meet hi or er bmden of identifying in terests that outwe i presumption of access wit pecificity DiRu ss a F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this indi vidua as soc iation i Epstein and Maxwell as been id rep rt ed in media afready and hi or her name was unsealed by he Second ircui previou ly Ave atti WL at He aring Tr at Thi material hould be un sea led in full First no int ests that outweigh the presumption of access ave been iden tified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Fmiher th i indi vidua i a law nfor cement offic i al and the only info1mation in the tran sc ript about hi individual i not sa lacious Thi material hould be un sea led in full First no inter ests at outweigh the presumption of access ave been id entified i th pecificity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second he depo ition of this individual pouse was rel eased with redaction by thi Co i and previou by he Seco Ci cuit and the on info1mation in the tran sc ript about thi indi vidual is not alaciou Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi ma te ri al uld un ealed in full Thi individual as give tatemen he media in co nne ct i i thi matt Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi a teri a hould be un sea led in full First no int ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been id ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second thi individual has i ve atemen an in erview to the edia in co nn ectio ith thi at ter a nd po1tions of this in div idu als dep os i ion were eleased by th Seco ir ui Avenatti WL at Hearin Tr at htt ps w.yo utub com/watc Wq KwAal Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First thi in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er bmden of iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th pecifici ty DiRu ss a F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Seco nd hi indi vid a a lle gatio aga in Ep ein and ot he rs ave een previously repo1ted by the pr ess and thi individual as give in erview he edia Avenatti WL at He a rin Tr at tps people com/c rime wo man o-rec rnit ed gi rl for jeffrey-ep tein-as-teen-rape ur i vo r-i was co nfu sed hen-he-die Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi a teri a sho uld be un seale in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been id ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytl upp 2d at Second this in div idu al tes ified publicly at Maxwells cr imin al ti ial we i hin aga in st cont inued sea lin Avenatti WL at Hearin Tr at o1iio hi individual deposi ion in hi atte we re a so un sealed he Seco nd ir uit This ate ri al uld be un sea in full This erso deposi ion in a prior Epstein-related atter is publicl avai lable and po1iions of that deposition we re un sealed the Seco nd ir uit Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi indi vidual i the same individual as Doe This a rial sho uld un seale in full First thi indi idual did ot raise a bje ctio un sea lin and thu did ot me hi burden of identifying intere sts th at tweigh the pr es umpti access wit specificity DiRu ssa F.3d at yt upp 2d at Second thi indi vid al nam and association wit Epstein and Maxwell as been widely publicized by the edia and thi indi vidua as been named as a defe ndant in public lawsuits elating Epstein Avenatti WL at ear in Tr at un sea lin documents rel a tin to oe ha been the ubje ct int se medi a coverage Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First this in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd identifying intere th at utwei the presumption of access wi th spec ifi it DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second thi individuals relationship wit Epstein as ee wide publicized by the edia Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Thi mat ri al ul be un sea led in full No intere sts that utwei th pr es umpti of access ha ve been identified wi th ec ifi it DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling This mat ial ul be un sealed in full No intere sts th at utwei the pr es ump tio of access ha ve been identified wit ec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at This ater ial uld be un seale in full Thi indi vid als name appears in a publicl available police repo1i and the nl document th at ub sta nti vely disc sses hi indi idual i a.heady publicl available the ocket wi th this indi idu als nam unreda cted See dkt Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First this indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er md of identifying in teres th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second hi indi vid a a lle gatio aga in Ep ste in and ot her have been previously reported by th pr ess hi in div idual gave an interview th aily Mail in and the Seco Circ ui un sea ed subs a tial infonn atio rel at in to this indi vidual Ave at ti WL at He ar in Tr at http da il aiLco.uk ne ws aicle-10357057/Key-figure case-aga in st Prin ce Andre fo1m st de nt-cl ai me Ep tein-man i html Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym OE OE OE Relevant Docket Entrie Ruling Thi in divi du al is a mn a li st and a ia a tin hi i nd i vid a be un seale in full oe ame a a i de nti fy in in fo nn atio all a in seale Doe i an a ll eged min or vict im sex a ab se who as ot spo li cly a who as a in ta in ed hi pr i vacy As ch li inte es does not tweigh ivacy in terests of a ll eged min i tim Thi a ial ld be un sealed in full Firs hi in div idu al i ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er de ide tify in in teres th at twe i es um ptio of access wi th spec i fic i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle pp 2d at Second seale aterial as to is ind i i a i ot salacio Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling Thi materi al ul be un sealed in full First this indi idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second thi indi vid a associa ion i Epstein and Maxwell as been id rep rt ed in edia a eady and hi name ca me up during Maxwells publi riminal ti ial Avenatti WL at He ar in Tr at Thi ater ial ul un sealed in full This indi vi du al did ot rai se any objec ti to un sealing and thus did ot ee hi er burden of identifying int erests that tweig th presumption access i ec ifi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Thi a teri a sho uld be un seale in full Fir no int ests th at tweigh the presumption access ave been iden ified ith eci fi city DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd all references thi person a re ei her Rul di sclos ur es searc tenn Thi mat ri al ul be un sealed in full First this in div idu al did ot raise an objec ti to un sea lin and thu did ot eet hi er urd iden ifying in erests th at utwei presumption of access wi th spec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle upp 2d at Second thi in dividuals assoc iati wi th Ep ste in as ee id ely epo rt ed in the medi a ah-eady Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i a teri a hou sea led i full Fir in te ests a twe igh th pre umpti acc ss OE av be i den ifi ed i th ec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco nd emai co ntain i th i in i i dual nam a nd assoc i a ti ith pst i ere pr ev i sea ed th i Co ir th sea led materi a as i ind i i dua i ot al ac i Th i mate i a ul be un ealed in full Fir thi in i i du a i ot rai an jec i to OE sea in an thu i ot ee i md iden ify i i ere th at utwe i umpti acc ss it ec i fi i ty Di Ru ss a 3d at Lytle upp a Seco th sea led at erial as i ind i i dua i ot al ac i Th i a te i a sea led i full Fir in te ests a twe igh th pre umpti acc ss OE ave be i ifi ed i th ec ifi ity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at Seco th oc ument at bs tan i el di sc sses thi ind i i a i ah ea pub li cl a va il a bl th oc ke i th i i ndi i a nam unr ac te dkt Th i a te i a sea led i full Fir in te ests a twe igh th pre umpti acc ss av be i den ifi ed i th ec ifi i ty DiRu ssa 3d at Lytl upp 2d at OE Seco i i nd i i a a ssoc i at i i ps tein a nd Ma xwe ll as bee i ep 1te i di a a ea and i a me ca me up dmin Maxwe ll publi im i nal tr i al A ve na tt i WL at a rin at Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i materia shou be sea led i full Fir no in te ests at outweigh the pre umpti access ave bee i dentified i th pecificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at OE Second this i nd i vidua as soc iation i Epstein and Maxwell as bee i de epo ted i media a eady and is he name came up during Maxwells public im i nal ti i al A ve natti WL at earing at Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i dentified i th pecificity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the ealed mate ia as to thi i nd i vidua i not salacious and co i sts pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests that outweigh the esumptio of access OE ave bee i dentified i th pecificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sea led material as to is ind i i dua i not alacious Doe name a any i de i fying info1matio ha ll emain sealed Doe i an alleged minor OE victim of sex ua abuse who as not poken publicly a who as maintained i or he ivacy As uc the public inte est does ot outweig the ivacy inte ests of alleged i no victim Th i mate ia hou be sea led i full First no in te ests at outweigh the presumptio of access OE ave bee i dentified i th pecificity DiRu ssa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this individual name was un se aled in mater i als eased by the Second ir cuit Case Document Filed Page of Pseudonym DOE DOE DOE DOE Relevant Docket Entries Ruling This i the same individual as Doe and the deposi ion examiner mistakenly used the in coITect nam in deposit i on trnnscripts at i ssue This ma te rial ould be unsealed in full First interests that outwe i the presumpt i on of access ha ve been id ntified wit specificity DiRu ssa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second hi individual testified publicly at Maxwell cr imin al trial we ighin against continued sea lin Avenatti WL at ear in Tr at Portions of this individuals depos iti in this matter were also unsealed by the Second Circuit This material shou ld be unsealed in full First no inter ests at outweigh the presumption of access ave been iden ified ith specificity DiRussa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this individual tes ified publicly at Maxwells cr imin al ti 267ial we i hin against continued sea lin Avenatti WL at Hearin Tr at Po1iions of this individuals depos i ion in hi ma tt er we re a so unsealed by the Second Circuit This material shou ld be unsealed in full First no inter ests that outweigh the presumption of access ave been iden ified ith specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the nl reference to this individual is in a deposition question ha was never answered This material shou ld be unsealed in full First no inter ests that outweigh the presumption of access ave been iden ified ith specificity DiRussa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second this individuals assoc iati on with Eps ein has been epo rt ed in the media aheady Ave atti WL at Hearin Tr at Case Document Filed Page of eudon ev ant Rulin Do ntri es Th i material ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indiv i dual i no raise any object i on to sea ing and thus did not meet i or er burden of identify i ng i nterests tha outwe i presumptio of access wit spec i fic i ty Di Russa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at OE Second is ind i vidua a ll egations against Epste i and ot ers have been previously reported by the press th i ind i vidua as given multip interviews to the med i a and this i ndividual as been a a i ntiff i public lawsuits relating to Epste i sex traffick i ng A venatti WL at Hearing Tr at ttps w.cbsnews.com ews jef:frey epstein-accuser Th i mate ial ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indiv i dual i no raise any object i on to sea ing and thus did no meet i er burden of iden ify i ng i erests that outwe i OE esumptio of access wit spec i fic i ty Di Russa F.3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed mate ia as to this i nd i vidua is not salacious and co sists pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures and lists of searc e1ms Th i mate ial ould be unsealed in fu ll First this indiv i dual i no raise any object i on to sea ing and thus did no meet i or er burden of iden ify i ng i erests tha outwe i OE presumptio of access wit spec i fic i ty Di Russa 3d at Lytle Supp 2d at Second the sealed mate ia as to this i nd i vidua is not salacious and co sists pr i mar i ly of Rule disclosures and lists of searc e1ms Bottom BBox Subtype Footer Type Pagination BDC TT0 Tf Tm EMC MCID BDC Tw Td The Court stays ts order for four10 teen days to perm10 it any impacted oe the opportunity to appeal after which counsel are asked to confer prepare the documents for unsealin10 pursuant to this order and post the documents on the docket SO ORDERED Dated December New York New York Case Document Filed Page of
59,378 characters
