UNITED S-5TATES DISTRICT C-4O-4URT SOUT-5HER-4N1 DISTRIC-4T OF FL-5OR-4IDA JANE CA SE NO Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant JANE CA SE NO Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant JANE CA SE NO Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant JANE CA SE NO Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of JANE CA SE NO Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant JANE CASE NO CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant C.M.A CASE 2750-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant JANE CASE 2750CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al Defendant DOE CASE 275080469-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of JEFFREY E-4PSTEIN et al Defendant JANE CASE NO CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant JANE CASE NO CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON Pl-3ai-3nti-3ff vs JEFFREY E-5PSTEIN Defendant PLAINTIF-4FS JANE DOES MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPO-8ND TO DEFE NDANT 2S MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR I-7D1ENTIFY JANE DOE-4 IN THE S-5T1YL-4E 2636Plaintiffs JANE DOES by and through th eir undersigned counsel hereby file this Motion for Enlargem8ent of to Respond to Defendant 2s Motion to Co m8p1el and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Th ird Party Subpoenas for-7 Purposes of Discovery or Alternatively Motion to Dism8iss Sua Sponte and state as follows Defendant Epstein filed his Motion to Co and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style et-4 al in the cases brought by Jane Does No 223Does on May and Under S.D.Fla.L.R Does No response is due on May Plaintif4f4s re5quest an6 ad6dition6al twe5n1ty da5ys to respo6nd to the Motion to6 Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Com8p1el and/or Identify Ja ne Doe in6 the Style et al This r4equest f4o1r e5n1largem9ent of4 tim9e of twenty days is nece)5ssita5ted prim8arily by Plaintiffs desire to have the psychiatric expert who exam8ined the Plaintiffs consider the issue of thei public identification and if appropriat subm8it an expert declaration in response to the re lief sought in the Defendant 2s Motion The enlargem9ent of ti-6m9e requested is sought to provide the expert with adequate tim8e-1 to perform8 this work Additionally Plaintiffs couns el has conflicts with othe cases and m8a-1tters which necessitate addition6a-1l tim8e-6 for response incl u6d1ing without lim9itation a special set hearing and6 upcom8ing trial in John Doe Diocese of Orlando case no Ninth Judicial8 Circuit for Orange County Florida and an upcom8i-2ng deadline to ile Appellant 2s in itial Brief in Jane Doe Florida Internationa University Board of Trustees case no Florida Third District Court of Appeals Plaintiffs counsel has conferred w8ith Defendant 2s counsel Robert Critton and Michael Pike regarding this request for exte nsion of tim8e Whi-7l-2e Defendant 2s counsel represented that Defendant would c5onsent to an6 extens5ion o6f4 tim9e of one week until May Defendant opposes any further extension of tim8e The grounds stated by D8e-1fendant 2s counsel for opposing the extension of tim8e request ed concern the relief sought in Defendant 2s Motion to Strike Cases from8 the Curr ent Trial Docket filed on May 2706WHEREFORE Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos res5p1ectfully request an6 enlargem8ent of tim8e until Jun6e-1 to file their resp6onse to Defendant 2s Mo6tion to Compel and/o6r-1 Identify Jane Doe in the S7t-1yle et al and for such other and further relief this Court deem8s just and proper Dated May Respectfully6 subm8itted By Stuart Merm9elstein6 2750Stuart Merm8elstein F7L Bar No Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of ssm8 sexabuseattorney.com Horowitz FL Bar No ahorowitz 6sexabuseattorney.com 2750MERMELSTEIN HOROW9I-2TZ P.A 2750Attorney5s fo6r Plaintiffs Biscayne Blvd Suite 2750Miam8i Florida CER4T1IFI4C4ATE OF S5E6RV4ICE I hereby certify that on May I electron ically filed the foregoing docum8ent with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF I also cer tify that the foregoing docum8ent is being served this day6 to a5ll pa5rties on the att ach6ed Service L7i-1st in the m9anner sp ec4if4ied,6 eithe4r-1 via tr4ansm8ission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/E CF or in som8e-1 other authorized m8a-1nner for-6 those parties who are not authorized to receiv electronically Notices of Electronic F6i-2ling S7t-2uart Merm8elstein Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of SERVI-7CE LIST DOE vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court Southern District of Flo5r-1id7a Jack Alan Goldberger E6s-1q jgoldberger agwpa.com Robert Critton Esq rcritton bclclaw.com S7t-2uart Merm8elstein Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of
4,732 characters
