Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of In this case of MJ Jeffrey Epstein case I contacted Mr Epsteins counsel Mr Knight to request that he accept service for his client and he declined My law firm was then forced to retain the services of Thomas Marsigliano a private investigator in New York to serve Mr Epstein My law firm has been forced to spend more than on the service of process in this case to date In a previous civil case against Jeffrey Epstein that I litigated on behalf of my client Jane Doe case number Mr Epstein invoked his th amendment right against self incrimination on nearly all discovery requests as well as all relevant questions posed to him and his co-conspirators in deposition One piece of evidence that Mr Epstein was ordered to produce included correspondence between him and his lawyers and the United States government Mr Epstein alleged to have produced all correspondence from the U.S government to him or his attorneys but did not produce that correspondence from him or his attorneys to the government I recently learned that there exists additional correspondence between Mr Epstein or his attorneys and the United States government that was not produced for some unknown reason Specifically I learned that there exists correspondence between Epstein attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez and former United States prosecutor Matthew Menchel as well as between Epstein attorney Ken Starr and various government attorneys and/or supervisors I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct FURTHER AFFIANT
1,560 characters
