Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No of the respective complaints However there are distinctions in the six motions filed based on the complaint allegations For example in the previously filed four motions Jane Doe Nos through Defendant challenged the Plaintiffs allegations as to assault in all four actions and challenged the battery allegations in JANE DOE NOS and but not in JANE DOE NOS and Defendant moved to dismiss the count in all four of the JANE DOE Nos through actions As to JANE DOE NO Defendant challenges the battery allegations but does not as to JANE DOE NO as the underlying facts of the requisite touching are alleged Defendant challenges the U.S.C count in both JANE DOE NO and NO Motion Counts I and Ill of JANE DOE NO 6s Complaint are required to be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted Rule Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient factual allegations in the Counts and instead alleges labels and conclusions and an attempted formulaic recitation of the elements in each Count In the alternative or in conjunction with Defendant seeks more definite statement of Count I and Ill In Count I the Plaintiff is required to more definitely allege what was done to her what EPSTEIN said and did if anything to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact in pleading the elements of assault and battery In Count Ill Plaintiff is required to more definitely state the underlying factual allegations to support her claim as set forth in the statute U.S.C and Rule See discussion of law below herein WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court dismiss Counts I and and require Plaintiff to more definitely plead the underlying elements of her claims Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No Supporting Memorandum of Law Standard on Rule Motion To Dismiss As established by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp Twombly S.Ct a motion to dismiss should be granted if the plaintiff does not plead enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face Id at Although the complaint need not provide detailed factual allegations the basis for relief in the complaint must state more than labels and conclusions and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do Id at Further factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true even if doubtful in fact Id On a motion to dismiss the well pleaded allegations of plaintiffs complaint are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff M.T.V DeKalb County Sch Dist F.3d 11th Significantly the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp Twombly abrogated the often cited observation that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove not set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief Id abrogating and quoting Conley Gibson U.S S.Ct L.Ed.2d The Supreme Court rejected the notion that a wholly conclusory statement of claim can survive a motion to dismiss whenever the pleadings leave open the possibility that a plaintiff might later establish some set of undisclosed facts to support recovery Id As explained by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp supra at While a complaint attacked by a Rule motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations ibid Sanjuan American Bd of Psychiatry and Neurology Inc F.3d a plaintiffs obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires ӌ??W t_K?z d?C v?𩝋?C Z??ZvWOj?o?_ 4R?k _?-y?hA?p??wK?ᾹMjd?C??Nޟ?k A?Mk u?h J??:?wXz F?AV!VH r?R??i??p?gd A 8RV Ԉ?c A S?I A _Pd a?h?k??WV?W?Z i a 2R JC?n a0??OO dH q3 i A I BH GK ݧw ɃɀBT N?u A?"?DC qr 2T ߵ?o??t?z OO DE b??ZO 2C sD v?CA A H?m o?պn?uOM A 読5 ZV??t 7P 6e 8?Ce r?m??O Bh A eѠ W?맵??z ꞯ??鴛I?x Awj?WM A pG i OP?r 3Dqn ZO_?U A?KI?A A A??h5A a7 M?t n?A tC i Ib:?t O??t?t?t?N?A A I Zn?i?O t??Ӥ 7?ւzw 1G A Ced3 Z?ƿ_ 꾴?uz 7M??zO ޟ?a4?t O?t??O?zO?:O A?OA?N e9 I?c2 A A?Q C?u A?O??T?dS 9NP P炇 u?i D1 o?n?T DZU I?H7T k??I?Z A?A??k eѼ uiiu OXI m?w t?S ޕ?y Dp??u ev?K t?v?/z?n ܙ?gQ?E cUz?Ư u??B n?M W?L o?W?i z??k wJ??z KJ?o 㯰??p L?n A?AA o?m n??P u?o Gdo b?n d3 nR k?D E?o l.?iZ_?U N?z Gy __ r?k a?Ѱa?A n?t A??L El o?l aa G??j n9S?nU XV O??Ҵ?kmWI;ߵ ڃu aH4 d2?E1L ڶ?w??w??ۥ?ڿ?iw 3R Epe W??a P?W k?b P?W??L iiXJ u?Xk?A??W?A P?l CA p?Q0 _P?y I J?J zR MX pA I;T a Oj?U?,?w i6 c?WmX kiv??n a llT z?u7 L?m a??mu?W?t w?_tD v3 i i U?a 9Q Pa Xa w?h o?5톰ҵ?b"D?pd X0 N??M l2 P?F am ҫ_?EH7 C_a I Xa ao E?d aS an A 8Ml-?a j?L Ki?D B?P c??C d3 a4 xkv?k av h5?DDHЂ A zB A5 X?ڥ?g?UY DP w?g?Է fG??i?dDtGQ e"??BuK?e?T?H j?b??T?gk Z?U?rk?E 9hO tP N?J oR ჰDGEׯ?T"??O?xA U_ cR Rdp?s2 ߴ?鮚 h4 dP gt?:?o xA i 4oȔ BC??ÔL xM M4?t p?M GDvA?:"Y i??zz?O?v Ud C?r 9C qk A RR A z0 Qk A??L H??x t??p xA t?a A ݽ?W I A 9C?A Pr u??i?n 7M OA a i H;?OO A OP tA mZ?v P?ޛ ck a vL1?T a7M?A a i?qh i i Dj??g?S?k??W?i?փ?A A ݘ?a_ j?P I?o ޗA?o??xN CE??_Mt?T쮚v i M8а?a A ӵ?u zn??P a4?O UV tA r2 OM 6v tC FCE??w?u r5 _?It?V?zz _ӥ?u E?莋 A z?A o?W iz?xo ue R?z?Ob o?U vZ lz?k rc wI uz?l?ۯ??W ʹ?K?o ߵ?_?Kk vR XiWگ??W??z o?ށU??1R?e k??V V?t A o?R D0 ߵ?U U?z??pt KA?ߵ k?F wL0 l?o?l K?i z??rL_ a V?g ݭ?z?Wi u?YH Pu?7 םPw?V?D Ka?XJ??u G_ dx M5 a a J??e x_q a8a7O??Xaa?_ z?al/?M OXi?Ӵ A i0 GB K??A 0L?h i 8D Xam?B:kjA?q?r a e?i a A xD d3 m??l a?iTD?DtGgb?GL GA?h Aw;?ax?dt h0?kaa D?U 0M 9Ia 0Mli A DDC"l F?DC due R??Z h?r UԕZ?u??P jY MT 2??GȄA?J a AD??钱 GD I k?ԋ 9E?O?Ԍ 4f F?a fF Z?I S_ DI?Lq a d9 _?ƽw?T iKw?0?U ꪨC i A?Z dT Xg za ʁB e9 W?T Ј?u lT ɷ/?h7A Q??T?KP?D O?A GD tJ?r A Pm A a I FLȎ i OM a 3Ј V0BB PF Dy WMS A W?K?p oA q?H a dh 9O?UM4 dvGW?Ӫ ZZ??7ZA r?ÿ?A?A ᜌ?3z ۯ?I?tդ??V?zA M?c K?i??:iBt B.C OM Ce S?qԆ i i T/?I lE PB?C u?!P h?I ׯҾ 8Ј ׯ?V I_ w!?r GY GD sPD 0A P?GD??U G?KA zN?wkp?뽄 ސt?w I k?n Ј?a DD?A B?S?E r6 K?K J?u?z wo i i X?gѴ ޘA _?t?OO?O M:Zӿ?Z?_?P A o?a B?Eʯv vh w?i xA ZD Qpn?M/?k?z.?zn??I?n??w_k 9c?r a 3u?n W??Ǯ U?zO?M ڿ??O I??H D2 p?W Ӈt Z?z?W O?N A a 1?Ӑi Z??ʫX?n RP Z??O kk I?j?E Dp _a a?ۯ?o?k k?A GA/l iV iWw z?굯 i P?k?J?j??k?k m?0dpc?a I ߺun??m?o?!NU L0?ݤ Ru?v?T Z?J?iZ z?RZ A C2?V?a U?LElW aom j??k V?_j?k?iz Pg a P?K?oom Az Ah5 j?WU??k??u?vI A0 kd DZLS Hbv a DA 0DuM ka CW յ?Q O??p M?ת amm5??4Ҳ u?ÿ?J?"F A?m W?o l0 L0 al a fGB a a a a a EA i??v?D ݫax a0 dtx A a tGDt v?d2 P?A Ma??a a4 O?E?E?a 鮶C A2 P?a8i?N??Dȯ i?DD ІS _?կN E?G 0_ Y7 Du?BҖ S?i Kp W?K wj?nw?B?i?D PB?O x!!E FV u߅ A Hq O?i?A za 0L U?U r?dt V?Wm5 Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No more than labels and conclusions and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do see Papasan Allain U.S S.Ct L.Ed.2d on a motion to dismiss courts are not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level see Wright A Miller Federal Practice and Procedure pp 3d hereinafter Wright Miller The pleading must contain something more than a statement of facts that merely creates a suspicion of a legally cognizable right of action on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true even if doubtful in fact see e.g Swierkiewicz Sorema A U.S S.Ct L.Ed.2d Neitzke Williams U.S S.Ct L.Ed.2d Rule does not countenance dismissals based on a judges disbelief of a complaints factual allegations Scheuer Rhodes U.S S.Ct L.Ed.2d a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears that a recovery is very remote and unlikely Pursuant to Rule a party may move for more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed where the pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably frame a response The motion is required to point out the defects and the desired details Id Count I Sexual Assault and Battery is subject to dismissal as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted It is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action Erie R.Co Tompkins S.Ct Pursuant to Florida law although the term assault and battery is most commonly referred to as if it were a legal unit or a single concept assault and battery are separate and distinct legal concepts assault being the beginning of an act which if consummated constitutes battery 3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault An assault and battery are intentional acts See generally Spivey Battaglia So.2d Fla and Travelers lndem Co PCR Inc So.2d Fla Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No An assault is an intentional unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force or exertion of force directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a reasonable fear of imminent peril See Lay Kremer So.2d Fla 1st DCA It must be premised upon an affirmative act a threat to use force or the actual exertion of force See 3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault The essential element of the tort of assault is the violence offered and not actual physical contact Tort of battery consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent Quilling Price So.2d Fla th DCA Sullivan Atlantic Federal Savings Loan So.2d Fla th DCA a battery consists of the intentional infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon the person of another See 3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault With the standard of pleading established in Twombly supra in the context of the elements for assault and battery Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted Rule As to the elements of assault here are no factual allegations as to what was said or done to Plaintiff such that it constituted an intentional unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force or exertion of force directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a reasonable fear of imminent peril See of Comp The same is true for the claim of battery Plaintiff makes the general allegation that he Defendant sexually assaulted Jane The other allegations in pertain to what Plaintiff allegedly did Under applicable law Plaintiff is required to give more than labels and conclusions and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action Twombly supra Plaintiff is required to allege the facts Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No of what was done to her what EPSTEIN said and did if anything to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact As noted in the introduction and as this Court is well aware there is more than one action brought against this Defendant attempting to allege similar sounding claims The details as to a particular claim asserted by a particular Plaintiff are important to give this Defendant fair notice of Plaintiffs claim so he may properly respond Accordingly under applicable law Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for sexual assault and battery In the alternative to dismissing Count I Defendant requests that Plaintiff be required to give more definite statement as to what was done to her what EPSTEIN said and did if anything to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact in pleading the elements of assault and battery Rule Count Ill Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of U.S.C is subject to dismissal as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted Rule Count Ill of Plaintiffs Complaint attempts to assert a claim for Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of U.S.C In her prayer for relief Plaintiff demands judgment against EPSTEIN for all damages available under U.S.C a Count Ill is required to be dismissed as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim under the statutes for which relief can be granted The applicable version of these statutory provisions Amendments as the Amended Complaint alleges a time period of in or about provides CHAPTER 117--TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND RELATED CRIMES Coercion and enticement Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No a Whoever knowingly persuades induces entices or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce or in any Territory or Possession of the United States to engage in prostitution or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense or attempts to do so shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than years or both Whoever using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades induces entices or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of years to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense or attempts to do so shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than years and not more than years CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN Civil remedy for personal injuries a Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section or of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit including a reasonable attorneys fee Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than in value Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability not later than three years after the disability Relevant to Plaintiffs complaint U.S.C a creates a civil remedy for a minor who is a victim of a violation of section of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation Plaintiff has failed to plead any factual allegations whatsoever pertaining to violations of U.S.C Rather Plaintiff has alleged conclusory allegations simply attempting to track parts of the statutory language in the statute without underlying factual allegations pertaining to the Plaintiff and any conduct by Defendant See of Comp Plaintiffs allegations or lack of factual Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No allegations are precisely what the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp prohibits Plaintiffs complaint alleges only labels and conclusions and a partial formulaic recitation of the elements First the Complaint fails to designate whether Plaintiff is relying on a or Second although the complaint does contain a partial tracking of the language in U.S.C it contains absolutely no factual allegations concerning the requisite using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce by Plaintiff to state a cause of action based on a violation of U.S.C As well there are no underlying factual allegations involving this Plaintiff as to the requisite elements that a defendant knowingly persuaded induced enticed or coerced any individual Plaintiff in this case who has not attained the age of years to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense or attempted to do so See U.S.C i.e with what criminal offense could Plaintiff and Defendant have been charged Again a Plaintiff cannot simply track the language of a statute without some underlying factual allegations to state a claim upon which relief can be granted Accordingly Count Ill is required to be dismissed In the alternative Plaintiff should be required to more definitely state the underlying factual allegations to support her claim as set forth in the statute U.S.C and Conclusion As discussed above herein under the pleading standard established in Twombly supra and law concerning the elements of Count I and Plaintiff has failed to state claims upon which relief can be granted Rule Plaintiffs complaint lacks Case Document Entered on FLSD Docket Page of Case No CV-80994-Marra-Johnson Page No underlying factual allegations and thus in the alternative to dismissal or in conjunction with Plaintiff is required to more definitely state the requisite factual allegations Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of October Adam Horowitz Esq Jeffrey Marc Herman Esq Stuart Mermelstein Esq Biscayne Boulevard Suite Miami FL Fax ahorowitz hermanlaw.com jherman hermanlaw.com lrivera hermanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe By ROBERT ITTON JR ESQ Florida Bar rcrit bclclaw.com MICHAEL PIKE ESQ Florida Bar mpike bclclaw.com BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER COLEMAN Flagler Drive Suite West Palm Beach FL Phone Fax Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
17,467 characters
